The SEC football Demands your your respect.

My Razorbacks lost to Missouri but other than that, I totally agree that the SEC is clearly on top

As much as it pains me to say this, the SEC is the strongest conference in the NCAA. This is coming from a Yellow Jackets fan. I hate UGA, but I do respect the conference.

Wow thats says alot comming from a GTec fan. Thanks alot

How's that SEC education coming along? It's T-E-B-O-W. Maybe if he wins two Heismans, then you'll be able to get his name right.

Lol good eye Mr. Harvey, Your right its Tebow my apology. sometimes i think faster than i type or Vise Versa, but any way I also need to apologies 2 U about Florida St.They will be tossed around again this year,and once again they should know exactly how to spell Tebow and every body else's name who's ahead of them in the top 25 polls.
CheckMate

Florida State's mediocre at best right now. I have no problem admitting that.

Yea its suprising how fast a program can drop off the map like that. Especially with a good coach...

the sec is good, but people like checkmate over-rate it. every conferance feeds on itself (except the sorry big 10) half the sec is crap. miss. st.-sucks, they beat bama, so did la-monroe, so bama sucks, kentucky was ok for about a minute and then remembered they were kentucky, so they sucked again. does ole miss have a football team? vandy, well, they are vandy, so they suck. what has south carolina done but beat no one and consistantly under achive. wow, thats 1/2 the conference. it would be one thing if lsu, florida, and georgia had to play each other every year, but they do not. pair that with the softest non-conferance schedules in the nation, and you have an over-rated conferance. god i wnt a playoff!

Ok,Ok lets just get this right. Since your a big USC fan lets talk conference, We can stick Vandy, Alabama ,and Kentucky in the Pac-10 and this might take away your 2004 championship wich you share with another SEC team (Auburn)-----Dont get me wrong i like USC and coach Pete but the problem is your schedule is weak, last year you lost to stanford (lol) and Oregon.USC path to the big Bowl game is set every year. USC only plays 1 or maybe 2 big games a year with this being said the Pac 10 only has 1 Champioship tittle within the last 10 years wich you share and the SEC has 4 and a half.USC will not benefit from a playoff system, Your in the mix every year with the BS schedule that you have (no sec teams) what else can u gain with a playoff..you would have to play real teams at the end of the year. (God I want a playoff). This way we will not be limited to 1 sec team to go to the big game,and we can truelly see what every team has to offer. Then you will see. that Reggie Bush should have stayed 1 more year and Matt L is not as good as every one thinks..If not the SEC then who? CHECKMATE PS I am a big Reggie Bush fan and will always be. I just came to state the facts.

first off moron, auburn does not have a split w/ sc. auburns strength of schedule was so weak that oklahoma still got to play after losing to k-state in their title game.thats what happens when your conferance plays community colleges for non-conferance games. usc won the ap, and the bsc title that year. they split w/ lsu the year before. yes, sc lost to stanford (pac 10 team) my point about conferances beating themselves is made by that loss. usc has lost one non-conferance game in five years. and unlike any sec school, they dont schedule chumps. oh, and for the pac 10 being so bad, we had 3 different schools ranked number one last year. sec had lsu, thats all. and oregon pre- dixons injury was the best team in the nation. yes, i know, injuries happen. the pac 10 has 2 titles this decade as well. know what you are talking about before you run your mouth.