Originally posted on Awful Announcing  |  Last updated 4/12/12

Given the incredible final round drama and exciting playoff finish in this year's Masters, it was a surprise to see Masters overnight ratings down 22%.  The golf world proclaimed Bubba Watson, his homemade swing, shotmaking ability, and likeable personality to be a rising star in the game.  That may be true in due time, but his playoff victory over Louis Oosthuizen provided the lowest Sunday rating number since 2004, posting an 8.0 national rating for Sunday's coverage.  The Masters found slightly better news in terms of overall viewership, with 13.5 million viewers on Sunday.  That's still down from 15.3 million viewers last year, and is the lowest since 2008, but doesn't reach the low since 2000 - 11.7 million viewers in 2003.  Here are the Augusta ratings since 2000, both with the national rating and average million viewers for Sunday, weekend totals, as well as the tournament champion...

Year Sunday Rating Sunday AVM Weekend Rating Weekend AVM Champion 2000 10.0 13.6 7.6 10.1 Singh 2001 13.3 19.2 10.7 14.9 Woods 2002 9.2 13.1 8.1 11.3 Woods 2003 8.3 11.7 6.9 9.5 Weir 2004 7.3 11.8 6.7 10.2 Mickelson 2005 9.8 14.6 8.0 11.8 Woods 2006 8.4 12.4 6.9 9.9 Mickelson 2007 9.1 14.9 7.6 11.9 Johnson 2008 8.6 13.1 7.3 10.9 Immelman 2009 8.3 14.3 7.1 11.8 Cabrera 2010 10.7 16.7 9.0 13.8 Mickelson 2011 9.5 15.3 8.2 12.8 Schwartzel 2012 8.0 13.5 6.8 11.0 Watson

Considering Phil Mickelson was in contention on Sunday and paired in the final group, it could have been thought that the rating would come closer to matching the 10.7 from 2010 (more on that in a second).  Alas, Mickelson's presence on the leaderboard, a double eagle, one of the best shots in Masters history, and a playoff couldn't overcome the dominant ratings factor in not just golf, but all of sports.

Tiger Woods.

The more things change in golf, the more they stay the same.  Ratings are all about Tiger, even for the most prestigious tournament in the world.  This week proved to be an interesting case study in that regard.  ESPN touted their ratings increases for Thursday and Friday coverage, but CBS was left with large decreases in their weekend coverage.  In fact, Saturday's coverage lost almost a quarter of its viewership from last year while ESPN picked up more than double digits for Rounds 1 & 2...

 

Thursday (ESPN): 2.3 rating - up 10% from last year
Friday (ESPN): 3.3 rating - up 15% from last year
Saturday (CBS): 5.0 rating - down 23% from last year
Sunday (CBS): 8.0 rating -  down 16% from last year

Clearly, viewers tuned in Thurday and Friday to see if Woods could reside at the top of Augusta's leaderboard once again.  His long winless drought ending at Bay Hill earlier this year gave hope that he may be able to win his first Masters since 2005.  But, as his game started to disappear and he plummeted down the leaderboard, so did the ratings.  The 6.8 rating for CBS's weekend coverage is among the worst since 2000.  For as much talk as there has been about golf building for a post-Tiger foundation, Woods is the preeminent force in getting eyeballs to the television set.

Since 2000, The Masters has averaged a 9.7 Sunday rating when Woods has finished in the Top 5 (9 out of 13 times).  When Tiger finishes outside the Top 5 (4 out of 13 tourneys), the Masters averages an 8.0 on Sunday, which is right at the number for the 2012 tournament.  All in all since 2000, the Masters has averaged a 9.3 Sunday rating with 14.2 million viewers.  

What about golf's second most popular star, Phil Mickelson?  Doesn't he move the needle?  In a word... eh.  Like Woods, Mickelson has finished in the Top 5 at Augusta 9 times in the last 13 years since 2000.  Those tournaments have averaged just a 9.1 Sunday rating, below the 9.3 average.  The four times Mickelson finished outside the Top 5, the tournament averaged a 9.6 rating.  Sure, it's more correlation than causation, more people aren't watching the Masters because Mickelson isn't contending, but it proves that Mickelson isn't quite the ratings draw you would have suspected.  In fact, the legendary 2004 victory for Mickelson (maybe the most exciting Masters Back 9 in history) is the lowest Sunday rating since 2000.  It just so happened that Tiger's bad years (outside the Top 10) at Augusta occurred when Mickelson did well:

2003: Tiger 15th, Phil 3rd, 8.3 rating
2004: Tiger 22nd, Phil 1st, 7.3 rating
2012: Tiger 40th, Phil 3rd, 8.0 rating 

And, the high rating in 2010 wasn't really about Mickelson at all, it was about Woods.  The 2010 Masters was his much celebrated comeback tournament after his sex scandal rocked the sport in late 2009.  The 2010 Masters is second only to 2001 in terms of overall viewership for the tournament.  That 2001 Masters was Tiger Woods at his golfing climax as he won his fourth major in a row and completed the Tiger Slam.  The tournament was well off those numbers on Sunday.

But what about the thrill of a playoff?  Doesn't a close, exciting finish have anything to do with viewership increasing?  Again, it depends on who is involved.  There have been four playoffs since 2000...

2003: Mike Weir d. Len Mattiace, 8.3 rating
2005: Tiger Woods d. Chris DiMarco, 9.8 rating
2009: Angel Cabrera d. Kenny Perry & Chad Campbell, 8.3 rating
2012: Bubba Watson d. Louis Oosthuizen, 8.0 rating

The four playoffs combine for an 8.6 Sunday rating, again lower than the 9.3 average.  The only playoff with an above average rating featured you know who winning.  Let's be honest though, those other eight names aren't exactly worldwide superstars, although several of them are great golfers.  Unfortunately, those three playoffs without Woods are three of the four lowest rated Masters since 2000.  It's a shame the playoff doesn't increase viewership, otherwise more folks would have gotten to see the epic missed handshake between Bubba Watson and Billy Payne.

In the end, golf depends on its starpower more than any other sport.  Nevertheless, there is only one star that truly does increase viewership.  As a golf fan, I hope the game will some day not have to depend on Tiger Woods for ratings.  Of course, golf may never again reach the peak that was 2000-2001 when Tiger Woods was the most famous athlete in the world and nearly everyone was picking up a golf club.  There will hopefully come a day when names like Watson and McIlroy and Oosthuizen will draw in viewers, but as the 2012 Masters proved, that day isn't here yet.

(Thanks to TVSportsRatings for the numbers)

MORE FROM YARDBARKER:
Cult of Sport: Before there was Ezekiel Elliott, there was Eric Dickerson
GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Raiders G Kelechi Osemele out Thursday with illness

Red Sox send Brewers $100 as final piece of Tyler Thornburg deal

Troy Aikman almost came out of retirement to play for the Eagles

Blues miss morning skate due to traffic in Brooklyn

Willie Taggart just savaged Brady Hoke during his first Oregon press conference

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Carmelo blows off Jackson's ball hog remarks, looks 'annoyed'

Richard Sherman throws shade at Cam Newton over benching

Sandoval's career fell 'into an abyss' after getting 'complacent'

Report: NFL believes Oakland ‘has no strong desire’ to keep the Raiders

Aroldis Chapman explains why he chose to return to Yankees

Brandon Marshall: Bryce Petty used to be ‘fat and overweight’

Sporting life: Gifts for the fan who is always on point

Matt Ryan is now Mr. Pick-Two

MLB Winter Meetings report, Day 3: News, notes and rumors

Four stinkiest games remaining on the 2016 NFL schedule

Ten young NBA players developing into stars

TailGreater: Tips for bowl travelers

Ranking the single-player modes of the 2017 sports games

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

Box Score 12/7: The date we got to know Bo

MLB Winter Meetings report, Day 2: News, notes and rumors

Ten most intriguing non-NY6 bowl games

Breaking down the NFL playoff picture heading into Week 14

All Sports News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Sporting life: Gifts for the fan who is always on point

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

Matt Ryan is now Mr. Pick-Two

MLB Winter Meetings report, Day 3: News, notes and rumors

TailGreater: Tips for bowl travelers

Ranking the single-player modes of the 2017 sports games

The five best (and worst) times athletes hosted 'SNL'

The five must-have sports games of 2016

The five 2016 Heisman finalists: How do they measure up?

Sporting life: Gifts for real fans (that aren't ugly NFL Christmas sweaters)

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker