Originally written on Fangraphs  |  Last updated 11/12/14

In a day and age where most picks are revealed on Twitter by Jim Callis or Keith Law, the Astros managed to pull off a legitimate surprise, taking shortstop Carlos Correa with the first overall pick in the 2012 draft. Correa offered the Astros premium potential and the likelihood of saving a little bit of money on the selection, which then gave them the opportunity to take Lance McCullers Jr with their second selection, so the pick had multiple benefits for the team.

However, it also created a chain reaction that caused presumed top selection Mark Appel to slide all the way to Pittsburgh at #8. And in turn, that is going to make the Pirates decisions today perhaps the most interesting in recent draft history.

The Pirates have a total draft allocation of $6.56 million for their first 11 selections, $2.9 million of which is allocated to the pick that was used on Appel. The slot bonus for the first overall pick – where Appel, a Houston native, had to have hoped he was going – is $7.2 million, so it seems unlikely that Appel (and his agent Scott Boras) are simply going to accept the slot bonus and sign for $3 million. Instead, Boras is almost certainly going to tell them that Appel still expects a bonus that reflects that he was one of the premier players in the draft, and will expect that the Pirates will make sacrifices in later rounds in order to leave enough money to make Appel a stronger offer.

Those sacrifices have to be made today, however. The Pirates already used their second pick, #45 overall, on Barrett Barnes, a player who was expected to be a 1st/sandwich round selection, so is unlikely to give the team a significant discount in order to sign. If the Pirates are planning on making Appel an over-slot offer, they’ll need to take a significant amount of easy-sign guys in rounds 2-10 in order to reallocate the cash from those suggested bonuses to their top selection. For instance, if they go for guys who were expected to be taken in the 10th round with each of their next nine selections, they could attempt so sign each one for $125,000 apiece, the slot recommendation for every pick from 300-338. That would cost them $1.125 million, leaving them with an surplus of $1.4 million that could then be shifted to negotiations with Appel, allowing them to offer up to $4.4 million without entering the penalty tier that requires the forfeiture of their 2013 first round pick.

But here’s the thing – if the Pirates go that direction, they’ve just handed all the leverage in the world to Mark Appel and Scott Boras. The Pirates would have punted almost the entire 2012 draft, rolling all of the value they could have expected from rounds 2-9 into making Appel a better offer in hopes of getting him signed. Not signing him at that point would be something of a disaster. Yes, they’d get the #9 pick in next year’s draft as compensation for not signing Appel, but they wouldn’t get any compensation for the sacrifices made in order to make him a stronger offer.

In previous years, teams would protect their leverage by taking a slew of hard sign guys after the 10th round, and if negotiations with their top selection fell apart, they’d simply take some of the money they were offering to the higher draft pick and give it to the guy who fell because of his asking price. Under the new rules, however, that is off the table. If the Pirates don’t sign Appel, the $2.9 million they’ve been allocated to sign him disappears. So, the Pirates essentially have to decide today – before they really have any idea of whether or not they can sign Appel – whether or not he’s worth punting the rest of their draft. If they think they can get him signed for something in the $4-$4.4 million range, and that he’s worth more than the value they’d extracted by taking a slot guy at #8 and in rounds 2-10, they should draft a lot of college seniors today. But, if they go that direction, Appel and Boras suddenly hold all the cards, which is probably not a situation they want to find themselves in.

So, I think the Pirates will just play it straight, mostly follow their draft board and take guys who might garner them a little bit of savings but not reach for guys several rounds earlier than you might expect. Maybe they’ll work in one or two senior signs in order to save half a million or so, but I can’t imagine they want to give up the rest of their selections on the hopes that Scott Boras plays along. However, if they just draft as if everything was normal, the later picks begin to assume more leverage than they should have any right to.

The Pirates can offer some slightly below slot deals to the guys they select today in order to try and save some money to offer to Appel, but their only bargaining chip is the player’s desire to play professional baseball. If the kid (and his agent) decide that they’re not going to sign for anything less than slot, the Pirates have nothing to gain by refusing to sign him at that price, since that money disappears from their total draft allocation. For instance, consider this scenario:

Pirates draft Prospect X with 69th pick, which has a slot value of $746,300. They offer $675,000, and he counters with $725,000. The Pirates will have more money to offer to Appel if they sign the kid for his higher counteroffer than if they stick to their guns. Having a firm stance in negotiations would not only cause them to risk losing the player they took in the second round, but would actually reduce the amount of money they had to offer Appel.

So, essentially, the Pirates have a couple of choices today:

A. Overdraft guys that you know will sign for a fraction of the slot recommendations, using the savings to make Appel a better offer and increase your odds of signing him.

B. Follow your draft board, making decisions without regard to Appel’s likely demands, and then hope that the agents don’t realize how much leverage they have in negotiations.

It’s a pretty fascinating pair of options. By taking the best player on the board with the eighth pick, the Pirates have put themselves in a bit of a pickle. That’s probably not the scenario MLB was hoping for when they came up with these new rules, as it puts the team in a position of having to choose self-harm in order to hold the line on budgets for the league. Under the old system, the Pirates could be rewarded for taking the best player on the board, and could simply invest more in their future product in order to help their team build a winner. Under this system, though, the Pirates are probably either going to lose their first round pick or take some serious reaches in later rounds.

These new rules were pitched as a benefit to teams like the Pirates. I wonder if Neal Hutington and company today feel like the total team allocations are actually working in their favor.


GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Jim Kelly: There is no doubt Tom Brady cheated

Warriors hang on, edge Rockets in Game 2 thriller

Farrell 'not ruling anything out' as Red Sox's struggles persist

Gretzky: Connor McDavid could be the next Gretzky

Bucs' Clint McDonald: Jameis Winston already leading team

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Dana White: Rousey vs. Cyborg would break UFC PPV record

Report: Smith child abuse investigation 'sexual in nature'

DeGale: ‘At the end of the day I’m better’ than Dirrell

Belichick suspected Tom Brady wasn't being honest with him

Johnny Manziel to be a full participant in OTAs

Ex-players sue NFL for conspiring to push painkillers

Ranking the NBA Playoffs' most significant injuries

WATCH: Will Smith ejected for foreign substance on arm

Guy behind NFL's social media trolling of Pats is a Jets fan?

In defense of 76ers general manager Sam Hinkie

Madison Bumgarner homered off of Clayton Kershaw

Would both Towns, Okafor prefer not being the No. 1 pick?

Spoiler Alert Central: Pitfalls in online viewing of live sports

NYPD officer takes photo with 'Eli's brother' at Letterman

Post-combine NBA Draft big board: Top 30

NFL suspends Bills Marcell Dareus for violating substance abuse policy

Astros surprising, but can get better with prospects like Correa

JR Smith prefers taking contested shots to open shots

All Sports News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Jim Kelly: No doubt Tom Brady cheated

Post-combine NBA Draft big board: Top 30

Ex-players sue NFL for conspiring to push painkillers

Astros surprising, but can get better with Correa

Here come the Giants

Aaron Hernandez got new tattoo in prison

TUF weekly recap by NOS® Energy Drink

Ten players who could benefit due to PAT rule change

Five QBs set for breakout campaigns

Report: Lakers will pursue Thibodeau

MLS leaders struggling with attendance

LBS: I was a contestant on Sports Jeopardy!

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
Help
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.