Film review: Cowboys vs. Lions
This week’s Film Review will be a little different. I wanted to take a look at how the Lions were able to run on us and why they were able to keep Kitna protected while completing passes. Some of what Wade Phillips talked about in the press conference I saw in the game. But if you watch the game again I think there were some things he just didn’t want to say. Which is smart, he’s got a good thing going right now, the team is confident, there’s no need to rock the boat. The problems are fixable. I’ll also look at the offense, but only in a cursory way, what happened on that side of the ball was pretty obvious.
Cowboys run defense
The Lions used our aggressive scheme against us. Remember back when the Phillips 34 was first introduced to us. There was a lot of talk about hitting one gap, getting upfield and slanting the line in one direction. We compared it to the 2-gap system that Bill Parcells ran which was read-and-react. With any system, there are pluses and minuses and we had seen enough of the 2-gap. This year we’ve been seeing the advantages of Wade’s aggressive style but the Lions were able to expose some of the drawbacks of the system.
In the running game, the Lions ran plays to one side of the line but had their runners cutting back against the grain. On many plays the Cowboys front would push hard to the side where the run looked like it was going, including the backside DE, and the linebackers were supposed to fill the gaps. The Lions were helping them along in that direction with their blocking scheme, then would disengage a double-team and send them to the second level to get Bradie James or Akin Ayodele. They also used a fullback on occasion to get the other ILB. Since the NT and the backside DE were over-running the play, and they could get blockers on the linebackers, the cutback runs were killing the Cowboys. Sometimes they cutback one or two gaps, sometimes they went all the way back across the line. The Lions even started sending a TE or another player back across the blocking scheme to kick-out the backside OLB or the DE if they stayed at home. There were also times, like what Wade mentioned in the press conference, when we had a free defender but he would overrun the play or would run himself into traffic.
For me, this is the essence of what the Lions did to us in the run game. The Cowboys calmed down some in the second half but the Lions were still able to run the ball on their 2nd drive of the half that led to the TD.
Now for a few specific players and how they played. I thought that Bradie James and Akin Ayodele had a lot of problems in the middle. They took some bad angles and they couldn’t get off blocks. Chris Canty was guilty of crashing down the line and not holding contain for the cutback runs on several occasions and DeMarcus Ware had a few problems, too. Jay Ratliff got caught on the far side of the run several times but at the end of the game he really came on strong. I also think Tank Johnson played a good game, he disrupted a couple of runs and got pressure on the QB twice. Jason Hatcher was guilty of losing contain on the runs a couple of times but had a few pressures on the QB.
Cowboys pass defense
The Cowboys couldn’t generate a decent pass rush. Some of that was because they had to start respecting the run since they couldn’t get it stopped and this slowed down their aggressive attack of the QB. But a lot of it can be contributed to the fact that the Lions offensive line simply outplayed them on Sunday. They were physical, they were quick to help on the edges and they picked up the blitzes very well. We didn’t seem to stunt or run as many of the blitzes that we usually do, we rarely brought any secondary players on the edges. And there wasn’t a lot of stacking Ellis and Ware on one side with Spencer on the other, or similar formations that are little out of the ordinary. I thought we might have played it a little close to vest.
The Cowboys cornerbacks didn’t help things. Anthony Henry was repeatedly beat and Terence Newman had a sub-par game. Including Reeves who got beat a couple of times also, they never made plays on the ball and gave up key 3rd downs. Neither starting corner played like they normally do. As a philosophy, the Cowboys secondary is not going to give up the deep ball so we are susceptible to the shorter passes.
We rely on three things on defense, and two of them are closely related. One - stop the run. Two and three - get to the QB for sacks and/or cause turnovers. We didn't do any of those well in this game.
After bad-mouthing the defense like that, I will say this: they held the opponent to 27 points, and we scored 28. That is the ultimate goal, after all. They made a nice goal line stand early in the game and they got the ball back at the end when we needed it. In between, they did enough to keep us in the game, but come playoff time, they’ll need to be sharper.
Offense
Tony Romo, Jason Witten and Marion Barber were outstanding, everybody saw what they did. Julius Jones had a few good runs to start the game and had a few good catches on dump-off passes. On a few of the toss sweeps though, if he would have hit the line hard and cut it upfield earlier, he would have had a much better day.
The offensive line played a pretty good game. Flozell Adams, Andre Gurode and Leonard Davis had really good days. Marc Colombo wasn’t his normal self. He wasn’t bad, but his ankle was obviously slowing him down a little and he gave up sacks and pressures on Romo. Kyle Kosier was pretty good and had the big fumble recovery.
Special Teams
I already talked about Miles Austin in a previous post. He’s becoming such a threat that the Lions started pooch kicking it and giving the Cowboys great field position. But Austin, you have to beat the kicker. Mat McBriar wasn’t that great on the day, he had a couple of short kicks that weren’t very high and he boomed one right out of the endzone. That’s not typical McBriar kicking. Nick Folk missed a long FG. Pat Watkins had a great play on a line-drive kick from McBrair when he beat two blockers and still made the tackle.
If you have questions about other players I didn’t mention ask them in the comments.
0 recs |
49
comments
Read Related
Comments
Phillips' comments
on Austin were hilarious. "They could stop him if they lined up nothing but kickers".
Absolutely outstanding analysis. What a great perspective for me to take into watching the game tomorrow night on the NFLNetwork. Thanks.
by dunkman on Dec 10, 2007 9:16 PM CST 0 recs
spears...
how did spears look after taking a closer look?
by hashishkabob on Dec 10, 2007 9:48 PM CST 0 recs
my question
also. I'm assuming since Grizz didn't mention him it wasn't good, but that's not a surprise. It hasn't been often we talked about Spears performance in a postive way this year.
by Cowboys81 on
Dec 10, 2007 9:51 PM CST
up
0 recs
I didn't see Spears do much of note
He was blocked out on a few plays I saw. It seemed like Hatcher was playing a lot of the time. I saw Hatcher much more than I did Spears around the ball.
by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on
Dec 10, 2007 9:58 PM CST
up
0 recs
not a surprise
maybe Wade is coming around the idea of giving Hatcher more playing time.
by Cowboys81 on
Dec 10, 2007 10:01 PM CST
up
0 recs
lions pass protect
so are you saying they weren't max protecting a lot? i didn't think so either but i thought thats what Phillips was alluding to. Kind of scary to think our line, which we started to count on as a strength, got manhandled.
by ab03 on Dec 10, 2007 11:10 PM CST 0 recs
i'm not sure but..
it looked to me like hatcher was in there to get some pressure and he didn't get much, i saw very little of spears and that might be one reason they ran over us...but maybe not....just looked that way to me..
by hashishkabob on Dec 10, 2007 11:31 PM CST 0 recs
I didn't see anything to support that conclusion
when I watched it.
by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on
Dec 11, 2007 12:50 AM CST
up
0 recs
Owens
So what exactly was the problem with Owens? Was he double and triple covered most of the time or did ROmo just not look for him? To me it seemed Romo hardly ever looked his way, but I don't have Tivo. thanks
by thelandryhat on Dec 10, 2007 11:47 PM CST 0 recs
Owens was smothered the whole game
by Nelson on
Dec 11, 2007 12:43 AM CST
up
0 recs
Like Nelson said
They were paying a ton of attention to T.O. They sent LB'ers and corners underneath his routes and kept a safety over the top. The Cowboys probably could have done more to try and shake him free, but wherever he went they would have followed. One thing we didn't need was a forced INT. So Romo took the openings those defenders left and used Witten and MB3.
by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on
Dec 11, 2007 12:53 AM CST
up
0 recs
You gotta get TiVo...
...it'll change your life.
by boysandbosox on
Dec 11, 2007 9:01 AM CST
up
0 recs
Ain't that the truth
When I'm overseas, it's the thing I miss the most.
by DalaiLuke on
Dec 11, 2007 9:24 AM CST
up
0 recs
NFC Running Games
I'm looking at the potential playoff teams of the NFC The only team with a good enough running game to take advantage our weaknesses is Minnesota. AP and Taylor are starting to scare me. If Jackson plays as well as he did last week for the rest of the season, we could see them in the second round of the playoffs and that would not be a good thing IMO.
Derek
by DerekSTheRed on Dec 11, 2007 7:59 AM CST 0 recs
our run defense is not a weakness
it actually a strength. The Detroit game was an abberation because Wade had the defense concentrating on stopping the pass, he didn't have them practice against the run all week. Their gameplan really shocked us.
If we play Minnesoata, Wade will have the guys stopping the run very well.
by Terry on
Dec 11, 2007 8:31 AM CST
up
0 recs
Vikes
Derek
by DerekSTheRed on
Dec 11, 2007 9:23 AM CST
up
0 recs
True that
The Vikes are a team I could live without in the playoffs.
by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on
Dec 11, 2007 9:26 AM CST
up
0 recs
I disagree Grizz our strength on defense
matches up well to their strength on offense, and their passing attack is weak. And Minnesota is very susceptible to being passed on and we have one of the best passing attacks in the league. I hope we get them in the playoffs.
by Burt D on
Dec 11, 2007 9:46 AM CST
up
0 recs
Not worried about Minnesota at all
Jackson in the playoffs does absolutely nothing to me.
San Fran
Detroit
Oakland
Eli
is who they have beaten on this streak. Besides the Giants, not exactly stellar defenses they have been running on.
Put 8 in the box and there is no way Jackson makes the plays necessary against Dallas.
I am not a big fan of having to play the Giants a 3rd time - very tough to beat any team 3 times in a row. I would rather Minnesota beat Seattle (I don't see happening) and have to travel to Dallas, than Seattle win and the Boys have to play the Giants (who will beat the Bucs).
by huslinone on
Dec 11, 2007 10:52 AM CST
up
0 recs
Minnesota is good...
but like you, I'd rather play them than the Giants. Minnesota runs the ball in dominating fashion and stops the run pretty well. They have playmakers on defense and Jackson has been playing well. However, I think we could take them in the playoffs. Romo can shred their D, especially if Glenn can come back and produce as our #3 WR. I don't think we can expect any playoff game to be easy.
by grapejoos on
Dec 11, 2007 12:10 PM CST
up
0 recs
Plus, Jackson will shirvel up like
a stack of dimes in the playoffs. There's much more pressure in the playoffs and he probably won't be able to handle it the first time around.
by Terry on
Dec 11, 2007 3:27 PM CST
up
0 recs
I don't see why everyone says he is soo good
I mean he's playing smarter the past few weeks, but smarter doesn't not equal good. His only game over 200 yards was a couple of weeks ago and it was only 204 yards. Fact of the matter is he can't exploit our secondary. He may be a good qb sometime in the future but not this year.
by Burt D on
Dec 11, 2007 5:35 PM CST
up
0 recs
Oh, he's not "good"
He's just been so much better than anything he's shown so far in his career over the past few weeks that teams are taking note. With their power running game, they only need competent QB play to keep the defense honest, and he is giving it to them right now. His job is to make good decisions; he's like the homeless man's David Garrard or Jeff Garcia. That seemed inconceivable earlier this year, but he is young and learning. Maybe he turned a corner. But, then again, he's still Tarvaris Jackson...he's not ready for prime time yet.
by grapejoos on
Dec 11, 2007 5:49 PM CST
up
0 recs
Amazing to me
to see this whole thread during the week our #2 rival is scheduled here and not a word about them.
I see no profit in talking about playoffs yet. I personally will be greatly disappointed to lose any of our three remaining regular season games. Two of three are division games and this year we have the opportunity this late in the season to sweep our division. Carolina is a trap game if ever there was one. Zero wins at home and they will be tough.
But Philadelphia - now that is the subject at hand. Will McNabb be the same player has played so well against Dallas? Will the Philly team remember the pasting they laid on us here last year? Will Westbrook get 100 yards receiving and 100 yards rushing? More later.
by lee3022 on
Dec 11, 2007 9:47 PM CST
up
0 recs
I never said they weren't good
you're argument was that Minnesota would run on us and I'm saying in that game, AP was pretty much shut down after a decent opening drive.
You're right though, if Jackson plays well, they'll be tough.
by Terry on
Dec 11, 2007 9:30 AM CST
up
0 recs
AP and Jackson
We shut AP down by stacking the box and forcing Jackson to beat us. If he starts making plays we'll have to back off which will open up the running game. Jackson is the real x-factor here. I'm not saying we would definately lose, but there's enough there to make me worry.
Derek
by DerekSTheRed on
Dec 11, 2007 10:25 AM CST
up
0 recs
unfortunately
we just might get them in the playoffs. Unless they lose to Tampa.
by Nelson on
Dec 11, 2007 11:17 AM CST
up
0 recs
Minnesota would not play Tampa
They would play Seattle
3-6 - Seattle and Vikings
4-5 - Bucs and Giants
We would see Minn only if they beat Seattle
Assuming we are #1, we get the lowest advancing seed
by huslinone on
Dec 11, 2007 11:23 AM CST
up
0 recs
oh ok
by Nelson on
Dec 11, 2007 11:29 AM CST
up
0 recs
Lion Rundown
Thanks, Grizz. I haven't seen the game yet (I guess it's on NFL Network tonight?) and instead of feeling a little bummed about watching a game whose outcome I already know, now I've got something to be looking for as I watch.
I get the feeling you didn't see anything that makes you worry about the Boys winning at least two of the final three games?
by RickT on Dec 11, 2007 9:11 AM CST 0 recs
Not really
I think the Lions played a great game and came in with a good gameplan that they executed well. But I still think we're the class of the NFC and should be able to secure the home-field advantage.
by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on
Dec 11, 2007 9:25 AM CST
up
0 recs
Last Drive...
I recorded this game direct to DVD like I do most Dallas games that I watch.
I watched the final drive about 10 times last night, just for giggles, because I absolutely DETEST John Kitna.
Just watching his sideline reactions the whole game, was worth it!
Anyway, the last drive is a Romo masterpiece, if I must say so.
But, Barber and Whitten, were the key components as well.
The fumble recovery by Kosier goes without saying, but the work by Barber and Whitten, to get out of bounds, on just about EVERY catch, was just great stuff.
Whitten especially, had that one catch where he was clearly hemmed in, and short of the first down, and he just lowered his shoulder, bulled for the first down, and got out of bounds at the same time; it was HUGE!
On the final pass, the thing that stood out to me, was this fact: Dallas ran 4 receivers, Whitten and Crayton off the line of scrimmage, and TO and Hurd split out wide.
I couldn'd see what happened to Hurd, but TO, Whitten AND Crayton, were ALL open on the play.
In fact, after watching about 10 times, I don't understand what Romo was talking about, when he said post-game, that the safety "bit" on TO, and that left Whitten open!
TO blew by his guy by the 5 yard line, and was WIDE open in the endzone.
Crayton was past his guy, and open in the endzone, and curling over towards Whitten.
Whitten curled inside a bit, but he was the most covered Dallas receiver I could see!
He had THREE Lion DB's who pursued him, from the very beginning!
TO's guy dropped off him, and curled over and tried to cover Whitten!
Romo could've gone to TO wide open; Crayton wide open, or Whitten attempting to be covered by THREE Lions; he whipped it to Whitten!
I'm NOT "criticizing" Romo!
I never played QB, I have no idea what to do, nor the process they go thru in making those decisions.
And, I'm not an "expert" game analyst, like Grizz, and those other guys.
So, I'm NOT trying to suggest anything, other than that is what I saw on the "film" last night, and just thought it was interesting.
In fact, after watching it, I'm kinda convinced that Romo went to Whitten on purpose, to give him a chance to make up for the earlier fumble!
Do I KNOW that happened? NO, I, don't but I wouldn't be surprised.
Again, I'm NOT criticizing anyone, just putting it out there.
Also, I did notice that Crayton looked to be running fine on the last drive; so maybe his ankle acted up after the game, because he didn't look limited on the last drive.
As for Newman, he was in on the last Defensive series; can't see him a lot, but I did see him once or twice; he looked a little "gimpy", but he was out there.
So, not sure what's bothering him, the earlier injury/foot or whatever.
Saw Henry alot; he looked okay all the time, so hopefully he isn't suffering a relapse either.
by Dale in Atlanta on Dec 11, 2007 9:41 AM CST 0 recs
I've a similar injury to Newman
Plantar Fascitis - or something like that.
It takes FOREVER to go away, and if you are a professional athlete, forget it... until the off-season and a couple months of serious rest, it will continue to bother him.
Here's hoping we can sit him in the Redskins game.
by DalaiLuke on
Dec 11, 2007 10:21 AM CST
up
0 recs
I was commenting on Kitna the whole game
Man, you talk about throwing your guys under the bus the whole game. He was just embarassing his teammates with his crybaby routine. Watch his reaction when his tight end drops that ball early or when Hanson misses the kick.
ESPN would probably power down and Skip Bayless' head would explode if that was TO with those exact same reactions. TO? It's because he's trying to show up his teammmates. Kitna? It's because he's ultra-competitive.
by huslinone on
Dec 11, 2007 10:58 AM CST
up
0 recs
Did
anyone catch T.O. on first and 10 this morning, I forgot to set my dvr and wont get to see it, so if any of yall saw it lets get some kind of recap of it posted
by jls2223 on Dec 11, 2007 11:06 AM CST 0 recs
Great breakdown grizz
I would not want to face MInnesota in the playoffs either as they seem to be a really hot team but the fact is, we need to beat any and all comers easily to stand a chance against the pats in the SB. I feel that this team will start the playoffs like the 92 squad - ultra focused and taking their game to the next level. At least that's what i hope!
by Billito on Dec 11, 2007 11:13 AM CST 0 recs
time off
Do you guys like having the bye week for the playoffs. I dont like it. We dont have too many injuries and our offense is in a good rythmn. We will take off week 17 and then have the bye week before the second round of the playoffs. I think thats too much time off to stay sharp for game situations. Maybe the 10 days had something to do with our run defense vs the Lions?
by gmadd313 on Dec 11, 2007 11:25 AM CST 0 recs
I like the bye week
I don't necessarily think we should take Week 17 off if we get a bye. That would probably be too much time off.
by Nelson on
Dec 11, 2007 11:32 AM CST
up
0 recs
Minnesota
beat Detroit, Giants, Oakland and 49ers
I would imagine there would be a lot of hot teams after that schedule.
by huslinone on Dec 11, 2007 11:26 AM CST 0 recs
True
But they didn't just beat these teams, they punished them. The Giants game was a bloodbath, and it looked like the others were as well (don't recall the Oakland game).
They're good, but we have to be better than them and all of the other teams.
by grapejoos on
Dec 11, 2007 12:27 PM CST
up
0 recs
And of those four teams...
The Lions, Raiders, and 49ers are among the worst defenses against the run... which we all know is Minnesota's strength with Peterson, Taylor and the best running O-line in the NFL.
And in the victory over the fourth team you listed -- da G-Men -- it was three Minnesota INT returns for TDs which led the Vikes to that particular win.
by kcbrett5 on
Dec 11, 2007 1:16 PM CST
up
0 recs
Minnesota beat the hell out of detroit
by Billito on
Dec 11, 2007 1:33 PM CST
up
0 recs
Listen, if you guys are worried about
any team in the NFC, then why would you want the Cowboys to go to the SB?
If we can't completely dominate any NFC team we face in the playoffs, whether its Minnesota, NYG, Seattle or GB, then we have absolutely no business playing either Pats or Colts in the SB.
by Terry on Dec 11, 2007 3:34 PM CST 0 recs
We can completely dominate them.
We can also completely dominate the Bills. Or the Lions. That's not to say that we will. Wins are wins, especially in the playoffs. For a team that hasn't won a playoff game in a decade, they can win every game by 1 point for all I care (assuming it doesn't cause me to have a heart attack).
by grapejoos on
Dec 11, 2007 4:22 PM CST
up
0 recs
Great analysis Dave
I want to talk about Spears who was pretty much MIA in the stat sheet (0 tackles, 1 assist). This guy is closing out his career here if he cannot man up against Detroit. We paid dearly to get him and he and Carp are beginning to prove the 50% rule that Coach Parcells cited. Two 1st round picks and one winner that year (Ware). Sad.
With three of our top four tacklers in the game defensive backs it shouts out about the front 7. Especially when they ran 32 times and the front 7 made 18 tackles combined. No wonder Newman is gimpy.
I am thinking that Philly will come with the unexpected as well this week. Each team we play now will want to get their bones by beating us first (except for the Pats). Can Philly out-physical us? Yes, on offense I believe they can and maybe on defense as well. I am going out on a limb however and predict JJ will break one for a TD as they are focused on beating us down.
by lee3022 on Dec 11, 2007 10:11 PM CST 0 recs
Regarding Spears
I'm sure most bloggers on this site would be shocked to learn that Spears is the 5th in fan voting among all NFC DEs for the pro bowl.
So there are some fans out there who think he's pretty good.
by Terry on
Dec 12, 2007 12:52 PM CST
up
0 recs
Or at least...
There are a lot of Cowboys fans rooting for every one of our players on the pro bowl ballot.
This is one of the biggest arguments for taking fan voting with a grain of salt that I've seen for awhile...
by grapejoos on
Dec 12, 2007 6:13 PM CST
up
0 recs
So true lee
Spears just isn't living up to his obligations on this defense. Hatcher is seeing more and more time. If they move Ratliff back to DE next year, things could be difficult for Spears. Good post.
by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on
Dec 12, 2007 1:27 PM CST
up
0 recs
Me too, Lee...
I am very concerned about how our defense plays on the heels of that disappointing performance against Detroit last weekend.
It would be cool if Wade/Jason/Brian installed a few new unexpected wrinkles of their own, while finding a way to get the D more inspired, as well.
How superb would it be to have Red Ball use Miles Austin on a crossing pattern and catching a ball in stride.
Or maybe having JJ and MB3 in the backfield together and send Julius on a Marshall Faulk type route where he goes deep.
What about throwing a Wide Receiver screen to Sam Hurd.
Just a few things to add to the script so as to give the Eagles something unexpected.
by kcbrett5 on
Dec 13, 2007 10:40 AM CST
up
0 recs










