Originally posted on Fox Sports Ohio  |  Last updated 2/7/12
By Ari Wasserman BuckeyeSports.com If personnel is the lone factor when dictating the identity of a basketball team, it likely didnt take Ohio State head coach Thad Matta long to realize that this years team would rely far less on shooting three-pointers. Of course, there was the obvious clue for Matta since the Buckeyes said goodbye after last season to Jon Diebler, the most prolific three-point shooter in the history of the Big Ten. But then theres the continued emergence of sophomore big man Jared Sullinger, whose dominance in the paint commands Ohio States offense to always run the ball through him, making lower-percentage shots from the outside less of a priority. Despite Dieblers proficiency from beyond the arc he made 227 3-pointers a year ago there were when the he got cold from long range. Relying on lower percentage shots, though worth more in points, can be liability at times. With Sullinger, who either scores or draws a foul most of the time he attacks the basket, its harder for the way he provides Ohio State points to go cold. I think it is tough to focus on the three-point shot when we have a presence like Jared in the post, sophomore point guard Aaron Craft said. It is tough not to want to throw it into him and playing inside-out with him. Thats the best offense we have. Ohio States philosophy has been a far cry to what was viewed as normal for the Buckeyes in years past under Matta. This years team is deriving only 18.9 percent of its scoring output from beyond the arc, which through Feb. 5 ranked 332nd out of 344 college basketball teams nationally in percentage of points. With the aid of Diebler a year ago, the Buckeyes got roughly 30 percent of their scoring from long range and ranked among the top 100 in the nation statistically showing Ohio States offensive identity is drastically different than it was a year ago. Offense last year, we could have just stood there and knocked down threes, said Sullinger, who leads this years team in scoring with 17.4 points per game. This year, were a little more athletic. Were slashing a little more. Having a guy like Jon Diebler was a real help for my freshman season, but in this offense we kind of know what we have to do to score with the basketball. When we play inside-out or drive the basketball, were very hard to guard. Matta acknowledged that three-pointers can often be great equalizers, momentum-builders or ways to put up a barrage of points in a short amount of time. But the Buckeyes havent found a need to rely on that kind of scoring this year. In the third-ranked Buckeyes win at No. 19 Wisconsin on Feb. 4, the team made only 1 of 7 shots from beyond the arc. Granted, the three Ohio State did convert came from senior William Buford late in the contest and gave the Buckeyes a four-point lead that eventually led to the 58-52 win. However, the Badgers a team known for relying on the three-point shot made only 5 of 27 from beyond the arc, causing the team to come up empty on a multitude of possessions which could have been one of the main factors in the teams loss. Wisconsin, who also lost to Iowa at home on Dec. 1 because of a cold night (3-for-28 from long range), illustrated perfectly what results look like for a team who relies on the three on a cold shooting night. But even as Wisconsin continued to fire attempts from long range toward the hoop moments when Matta acknowledged being scared as hell Ohio States offensive philosophy remained constant. And it came in the form of getting Sullinger the ball in the paint. We did a decent job of taking what was given to us, Matta said. For instance, a lot of times our threes come in transition and Wisconsin is a really, really good transition defensive team. For points per possession against a great defense, I thought we were pretty effective with what we were trying to get done. But the question begs to be asked: Will there be a time when an opposing athletic big man neutralizes Sullinger, forcing Ohio State to rely on the three to keep itself in the game? And if that were to happen, it still remains unclear if the Buckeyes have the proven consistent shooting weapons to overcome such a situation if theyre faced with it come NCAA Tournament time. Though Ohio State lost to Kentucky in the Sweet 16 after a clutch shot late, Diebler tied the game with a crucial three with less than a minute remaining the previous possession. Who would make that shot this year? Perhaps nobody, as the Buckeyes could opt to throw it into Sullinger and extend the game. Ohio States top weapon from long range is sophomore shooting guard Lenzelle Smith Jr., who had converted 44.7 percent of his threes through Feb. 5. However, Smith had attempted only 38 shots from beyond the arc and remains a question mark offensively despite showing signs of proficiency in that area during Ohio State wins at home against Indiana and Michigan. The Buckeyes had attempted only 336 three-pointers this season through 23 games, which equals roughly 14 attempts per contest. Only 47 other college basketball teams out of 344 have attempted a lower average of treys. My thing is take good ones, Matta said. If we have good shots, lets take them. We havent really talked about shooting threes (because) at this stage of the season our guys know when they should shoot it and who should shoot it and hopefully the difference between a good one and a bad one. I havent really thought about only shooting seven threes (against Wisconsin) because when I first started coaching here everyone was saying, You guys take too many threes. Im trying to even it up. Sophomore Jordan Sibert was being molded into a sixth man who would come off the bench and knock down threes, thus changing the pace of the game and causing defenses to adjust. However, Sibert is shooting only 26.5 percent from long range and has seen his minutes decrease in recent games. Buford has shot the most number of threes, making 36 of 97 attempts (37.1 percent) from beyond the arc, while sophomore Deshaun Thomas has made 23 of 70 (32.9), but there hasnt been a clear-cut, go-to shooter who can be relied on to make shots of that sort. Ohio State hasnt avoided shooting three-point jumpers because it isnt converting. The Buckeyes have knocked down 33.0 percent of their attempts from beyond the arc as a team, but that ranks only 225th nationally. Even Sullinger has made 8 of his 19 attempts (42.1 percent), most effectively when spotting up after arriving late in transition. But Matta prefers higher-percentage looks inside, especially because Sullinger is one of the best finishers in college basketball. Making that strategy even more important is the big mans proficiency at the free-throw line he is 93 for 122 (76.2 percent) at the charity stripe. No one has been able to force Ohio States hand offensively, as Sullinger has typically outdueled opposing teams big men. And the Buckeyes strategy will remain the same as long as Sullinger continues to dominate the paint. It is not like it was last year when Jon Diebler was knocking down every shot, Thomas said. We have a guy like Sully and we can play inside-out, and we have multiple guys who can drive the ball and get three-point plays a layup and one. That could be our three-point play. We are just trying to win ballgames.
GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

DeMarcus Cousins traded to Pelicans for players, picks

West teammates hilariously celebrate Durant and Westbrook oop

Report: Romo willing to rework contract to facilitate trade

Lonzo Ball's father says son is better than Curry right now

Report: Rams could have interest in Cousins if Goff flops

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Mike Trout talks about 'frustrating' struggles of Angels

Report: Butler to Celtics talk will loom over All-Star week

Report: Carmelo expects to remain with Knicks

James Harden: ‘For sure’ I’m the best player in the world

Report: Pats expected to make good effort to keep Bennett

Glenn Robinson III dunks over three people to win Slam Dunk Contest

Is the NBA All-Star Game worth saving?

There will never be another Dirk Nowitzki

The Rewind: Michael Jordan's last All-Star Game

Best of Yardbarker: NBA All-Star Games past, present and future

Eat, Drink, Watch: Everything goes better with a side of New Orleans

Box Score 2/17: Happy birthday, Michael Jordan (and welcome to 1000 point club, Sid!)

The 'Michael Jordan might still win the Dunk contest if he entered' quiz

How to reboot NBA All-Star Weekend

Second-year NBA stars who can salvage the season

Observations from a day at the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show

Box Score 2/16: Getting ready for the ASG

Too much to Process: Can Simmons match the Embiid hype?

College Basketball News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Best of YB: NBA All-Star Games past, present and future

Who will break these NBA All-Star Game records?

Is the NBA All-Star Game worth saving?

There will never be another Dirk Nowitzki

The Rewind: Michael Jordan's last All-Star Game

Eat, Drink, Watch: Everything goes better with a side of New Orleans

How to reboot NBA All-Star Weekend

Baseball movies you can stream now to hold you over until Opening Day

Second-year NBA stars who can salvage the season

Observations from a day at the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker