Found August 01, 2006 on
Capitol Punishment:
I thought Jim Bowden really blew it by not moving Soriano before the deadline, but maybe he didn't. If he leaves at the end of the season ,the Nationals get two first round picks. Is that better than what was being offered? I'm not sure. What did Nationals fans think? Did the time spent on Soriano negotiations negatively affect potential trades involving Livan or Armas that should have taken place. Probably. Read the link and tell me what you think.
Original Story:
http://dcbb.blogspot.com/2006/07/bang...
-
TopicRepliesLast Activity
-
Dodger trades
Bluefan4ever started this MLB thread05 minutes ago -
Yankees hot stove action
Gmarchesej started this New York Yankees thread23 hours ago -
Yankees honored for HOPE Week
Gmarchesej started this New York Yankees thread015 hours ago -
Pujols your unanimous MVP
Gmarchesej started this MLB thread015 hours ago -
Five Moves For a 2010 Milwaukee Brewers' Playoff Run
JMotiff started this Milwaukee Brewers thread021 hours ago
Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers
Company Info
Help
What is Yardbarker?
Join the Yardbarker Network (YBN) for more promotion, traffic, and money.


















paulzummo said August 01, 2006
For what the Nats are trying to do, which is build a competetive, young team, they probably ought to have dealt Soriano.
MasterBlaster replied August 01, 2006
I didn't know the Mets got Wright and Heilman when Hampton walked. Good stuff.
pistolpete replied August 01, 2006