Add Comment

• giantsrepeat said November 01, 2009

  What's the difference, it was a homer whether the camera was there or not?!

  Reply

  
  • SMH12289 replied November 01, 2009

    Dont know about that..Some say the Camera was actually sticking out past the wall so if the camera wasnt there the ball would've just bounced off near the top of the wall..either way the camera placement sucks
• DaBirds717 said November 01, 2009

  Camera was coming out past the wall. It was a tough call looking at the replay. Its a ****** situation considering that homer seemed to wake up the Yankee bats. As a Phils fan I am not feeling good about the series at this point.

  Reply

  
• giantsrepeat said November 01, 2009

  "Some say"!?.... like in 45000 Phillies fans smh. There's no doubt that ball would have cleared the wall had the camera not been there. But I respect your view of it.

  Reply

  
  • SMH12289 replied November 01, 2009

    heres a pic:
    
    http://a323.yahoofs.com/ymg/ept_sports_mlb_experts__41/ept_sports_mlb_experts-259783754-1257044150.jpg?ym2yoICDENjWQf4U
    
    
    Can you say without ANY doubt that camera is not over the wall? Can you say without ANY doubt that if the camera wasnt there the ball goes over the wall? because I cant
• giantsrepeat said November 01, 2009

  I don't need to see a pic, it was a homerun, period!! If it went the Phillies way I woyld be saying the same thing.

  Reply

  
• hlkjhlk8 said November 17, 2009

  A-Rod did NOT hit a home run in the 2009 World Series. The ball was not going over the fence. Watch how much it drops from the side view and check out the picture above. If it isn't clearing by more than 1 foot, how in the world is it clearly a home run. Because its not, and nobody wants to admit it.

  Reply