Add Comment

• BHF1999 said June 18, 2007

  Buehrle is a solid pitcher, but unless the Mets are hoping to sign him after the season, I'm not sure he's worth it. He's not a good enough rental. I don't think he's a difference maker at this point in his career.

  Reply

  
• DennyGreen said June 18, 2007

  Why do the Mets want to deal Milledge so bad?

  Reply

  
  • General_Zod replied June 19, 2007

    Its not that they want to deal him so bad, it's that he's the most dealable prospect they have, that's how stocked they are at OF.
• rayj0101 said June 19, 2007

  Just dont think this will happen. How do you get rid of Buehrle?

  Reply

  
  • General_Zod replied June 19, 2007

    Apparently he wants a five-year deal and Kenny Williams has said he'll never go for it.
• JeffZNY said June 19, 2007

  It sounds like Buehrle will definitely be dealt. It's just a matter of where and for what. I've only watched the guy pitch a handful of times, so I won't claim to be an expert...but at 28, with a no-hitter on the resume, and the prospect of moving from the AL to the NL - I'd have to think this guy can be a productive National League pitcher for the next 5 years.

  Reply

  
• Coons3 said June 19, 2007

  I don't know about this trade Milledge is a young guy who has alot of potential and besides Beltran the Mets need to think obout putting him in the outfield. Buehrle on the other hand is like in his mid-thirties and never really has a very good record and his ERA is always above four or a little under, plus not many strikeouts. To me this would not be a good deal for the mets. The Mets rotation has to many old guys already, Tom Glavine and Pedro and then adding Buehrle. Besides John Maine the Mets need some young talented pitchers. Trade Milledge for a good young pitcher.

  Reply