Found August 01, 2006 on
Capitol Punishment:
I thought Jim Bowden really blew it by not moving Soriano before the deadline, but maybe he didn't. If he leaves at the end of the season ,the Nationals get two first round picks. Is that better than what was being offered? I'm not sure. What did Nationals fans think? Did the time spent on Soriano negotiations negatively affect potential trades involving Livan or Armas that should have taken place. Probably. Read the link and tell me what you think.
Original Story:
http://dcbb.blogspot.com/2006/07/bang...
THE BACKYARD
BEST OF MAXIM
AROUND THE WEB
MLB Forum Discussions
3 replies,
2 days ago
1 replies,
2 days ago
1 replies,
2 days ago
1 replies,
2 days ago
2 replies,
3 days ago
| Latest Rumors |
|
|
|
|
Today's Best Stuff |
For BloggersJoin the Yardbarker Network (YBN) for more promotion, traffic, and money. |
Company Info |
Help |
What is Yardbarker?Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond. |













For what the Nats are trying to do, which is build a competetive, young team, they probably ought to have dealt Soriano.
I didn't know the Mets got Wright and Heilman when Hampton walked. Good stuff.