Originally posted on Taking Bad Schotz  |  Last updated 11/4/12
Last offseason David Ortiz was visibly upset about the nature of his contract negotiations with the Red Sox.  His asking price, a two-year contract at the same pay that he was currently making, was apparently more than the Red Sox were willing to pay.  The two sides eventually settled on a one-year contract worth $14.57 million.  Ortiz called the negotiations both embarrassing and humiliating.  The 2012 season gave Ortiz the chance to prove that he was worth the two year contract that he felt he deserved, and that is exactly what he did.  Ortiz triple slashed .318/.415/.611, good for a four digit OPS.  His 169 wRC+ was first among designated hitters with at least 100 plate appearances.  This led to a three-win season despite being limited to only 383 plate appearances due to an Achilles injury. via tedsarmy.com The Red Sox responded to this showing by doing what they should have done a year ago, sign Ortiz to a two-year deal.  The contract, worth $26 million over those two years, looks like a good deal for both sides.  Ortiz got the job security he wanted, and the Red Sox retained their best offensive player for a below-market-level price.  At $13 million a season, assuming teams will continue to pay about $5-6 million per win this offseason, Ortiz is being paid like a 2.5 win player.  In the last three seasons, he has averaged around 3.2 WAR, and that includes last season in which he lost a significant amount of time to injury, so there should be some surplus value in this contract for the Sox. Some may point to Ortiz’s age –he will turn 37 later this month– and his recent injury history to suggest that this was a risky signing for a team in such a state of flux.  While the risk of injury will always be a factor when evaluating contracts, Ortiz has registered over 600 plate appearances in three of his last four seasons; so as long as there are no lasting issues with the Achilles injury, Ortiz should come with no more injury risk than the average player, perhaps even less considering he never plays in the field.  As far as aging is concerned, he has actually improved his wRC+ in each of the last three seasons.  Part of this can be attributed to his decreasing strike out rate.  His K% dropped from 23.9% to 13.7% in 2011, and to 13.3% in 2012.  It is often the case that when a player’s K% goes down, his power numbers also drop.  Ortiz, however, has put up ISO rates of .246 and .293 in his last two seasons.  He may be getting old, but his stats aren’t showing it. There were legitimate questions coming into the offseason regarding whether Ortiz would be in a Red Sox uniform next year.  He seemed unhappy with their handling of his contract last offseason, and let’s not forget, the Red Sox were awful in 2012.  But it was clear that Ortiz wanted to remain in Boston, and the Red Sox didn’t want to lose a franchise icon following such a disappointing season.  In the end, the two sides agreed on a mutually beneficial contract that will see Ortiz play at least two more seasons in Fenway Park.  It would’ve been unfortunate had it ended up any other way. -Albright
GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Todd Bowles confirms Ryan Fitzpatrick is Jets starting QB: ‘It’s his job’

Carmelo Anthony shocked Dwyane Wade left Miami for Chicago

Report: David Lee signs with the Spurs

Craig Sager to miss Olympics while undergoing bone marrow transplant

Jarryd Hayne wouldn’t have retired if NFL had minor league system

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Draymond Green: ‘Me and LeBron are friends’

Pierre-Paul won't need to wear club on hand this season

Report: Four cities remain in contention to host 2017 NBA ASG

Doc Rivers: Clippers have plan to let Paul Pierce retire as a Celtic

Another young 49er, Kaleb Ramsey, retires from NFL

Saints GM: Drew Brees’ contract situation is not a ‘distraction’

Everything that's already gone wrong at the Rio Olympics

Hue Jackson: Browns will give Josh Gordon a fresh start

Diamondbacks nearing Daniel Hudson trade

Amar'e Stoudemire's presence (and absence) changed the NBA

What would George Costanza have traded to get Bonds and Griffey?

Gabby Douglas can make USA Gymnastics history at Olympics

Week 3 will determine the Big Ten's reputation this season

Cam Talbot thinks the Oilers are close to making the playoffs

The new era of WWE SmackDown has liftoff

Vlade Divac: Cousins ‘most dominant player in the world’

Wild offer to make Prince's 'Let's Go Crazy' new goal song

Canucks don't dismiss acquiring player with past issues

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Everything that's already gone wrong at the Rio Olympics

Amar'e Stoudemire's presence (and absence) changed the NBA

We asked Team USA: What other Olympic sport would you play?

Why Gary Bettman's CTE denial is cause for concern for NHL

WATCH: Inside the Nike SNKRS BOX in SF for Golden Air Celebration

WATCH: Five other uniforms Chris Sale should cut up

QUIZ: Name every Olympic event in which the USA has never won a gold medal

Five U.S. Olympians favored to win multiple gold medals

WATCH: What teams should join the Big 12?

One Gotta Go: Do NBA players really love NBA2K?

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker