Add Comment

• ptowncboy said January 11, 2008

  i would have traded him for a bag of popcorn

  Reply

  
• newyork204 said January 11, 2008

  Portland has played the game smart. I've been to every home Blazers game this year and they are for real. We are just like the Grizzleys several years back but better. We have a solid 10 man rotation. Portland has the deepest bench in the NBA. Nate can just keep bringing in fresh legs throught the whole game. Nobody, not even Roy nor Alderidge, is a superstar, yet, every guy on the team is capable of a 15-20 pt night. Who is it going to be? Not other team can fully prepare for that.

  Reply

  
• swiftlyjenkins said January 12, 2008

  I just love how this summer everybody thought Portland was out of its mind for trading Zach Randolph, 25pts- 10rebs was all they could see. Now they think it was the most brilliant thing since the light bulb. Like I've written in my blog, it takes more than raw talent to be a winner. I knew they were getting rid of his mentality more than anything else. Nate Mcmillan brought that 25-10 out of him, and for his efforts, Randolph coigned the name "Sarge" because of the "demands" Mcmillan was making of him. Now everybody's talking like there so smart, because Randolph is the same blame shifting bum he always was. I'd rather them not say anything

  Reply