But there's no way the Blazers have any legal legs to stand on regarding this: "Team Presidents and General Managers, The Portland Trail Blazers are aware that certain teams may be contemplating signing Darius Miles to a contract for the purpose of adversely impacting the Portland Trail Blazers Salary Cap and tax positions. Such conduct from a [...]
-
TopicRepliesLast Activity
-
Review: NBA 2K10 for the Nintendo Wii
DCWIZ__ started this NBA thread01 hour ago -
Kobe Doin' Work Review
foxyjj started this NBA thread02 hours ago -
NBA Rookie Guards Stepping Up
dGoodey started this NBA thread018 hours ago -
Big Ticket Nets Big Bucket Versus Knicks, 107-105 | Boston Sports Then and Now
joemgill88 started this Boston Celtics thread018 hours ago -
Updated NBA Rookie Rankings
TheDSH started this NBA thread01 day ago
Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers
Company Info
Help
What is Yardbarker?
Join the Yardbarker Network (YBN) for more promotion, traffic, and money.























DoWork said January 09, 2009
BigRandy replied January 10, 2009
UNC23Tarheels said January 09, 2009
nate77 replied January 09, 2009
lewii5 said January 09, 2009
but i can't decide whether this was smart or shady, sometimes good business moves walk the line between the two. i'm thinkin it was said mainly to dissuade any team from doing it and portland doesn't really have any intention of taking legal action if another team signs him (at least i hope not), cause they would surely lose.
speedwell said January 10, 2009
Pretty sure that it is illegal for them to attempt to stymie Darius' efforts to gain employment in the NBA by threatening a lawsuit to deter teams from hiring and playing him.
I think it is now the DUTY of some Western Conference team to sign Darius to a 10-day contract and play him a couple games. Hell, put him on the Knicks for a few games so he and Q can get their martian antenna head bump going on again.
lewii5 said January 10, 2009
BigRandy said January 10, 2009
Lakerhater said January 10, 2009
BigRandy said January 11, 2009
Lakerhater replied January 11, 2009