National Football League

NFL Home
Articles
Quizzes
Photos
Videos
Related Sites
Fans
Teams
Players
Scores
Schedule
Fantasy
Rumors

If eagles don't get Chad Johnson!!

submitted by ferkid20
May 16, 2008  |  238 comments  |   Email to a Friend
This is now a guarentee that the BIRDS will get Chad Johnson!!! After seeing McNabbs comments that he recently posted.. I now can guarentee that they will get him. I am writing this because since the beginning I have been saying we will get Chad Johnson and I have been receiver alot of harsh comments ( I have received people backing me up too for the record) but I am here right now saying if we don't get Chad Johnson then I will never write another comment on this website again!! Lastly I want everyone's comments who is with me and who is against me because when we get him I want to know the people that were with me and the people that weren't. So you can leave your harsh comments and whatever you want.... Let's see it.
How much do you know about the National Football League? Find out with Yardbarker Quizzes.

231 Comments On: "If eagles don't get Chad Johnson!!"

 
1. DubDeezy80 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
And when is this supposed to happen?

2. ferkid20 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
Before the season.... Possibly June 1st...

3. dfmcnabb , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
I honestly don't know what to make of Donovan's comments. I'm trying not to read into them, but I don't want to get any hopes up that something big is going to happen. If it does great, if it doesn't then we move forward with the guys we have.

3.2. cowboydude , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
Well to be completely honest you shouldn't listen to McNabb's comments because he has NO say as to who the Eagles sign and even less say in if the Bengals will trade him and to whom they will trade him.

4. bleedingreen , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
Donovan's comments weren't any different than what is S.O.P. for every team. Scanning the waver wire for June 1st cuts and possible trades. But, I guess the philly faithful just won't rest until ocho stinko is doing sit ups in HIS driveway...

5. ferkid20 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
No we won't !!! Secondly the June 1st cutes have gone down alot. It isn't what it use to be at all. Why would he say June 1st at all? he hasn't in the past and there is only one receiver that won't be traded until june 1st.

6. Ebliterate , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +2 pts
|   |   | 
Roy seems like a perfect fit for the ''Don'' rather than chad cause the media is gonna ask to many repeat T.O questions just another'(Distraction)' but Chad or Roy?

8. pipoto77 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  -2 pts
|   |   | 
EVERYONE CHECK OUT WIKIPEDIA an write down Chad Johnson and look towards the bottom he is going to meet up with the Eagles on June first regarding a Trade with Cb Lito Sheppard This is Crazy

9. NCeagles93 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
seriously Ferkid, i'm backin you up,

OCHO will be an Eagle June 1st, and if not, Williams will, and if not, Boldin will, and so on and so on.
the point here: EAGLES FO DONT BE DUMB AND GO AFTER OCHO WITH EVER THING YOU GOT. And we'll all get that shiny ring we wanted for 43 years.

10. yodoof , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
mcnabb obviously wasnt happy that he didnt get a wr. i dont think he blames the organization because its not their fault. they tried, but we might get chad after june 1st. we would also have to try and get a cb in the deal to play the 3rd spot if we trade lito though

11. Ebliterate , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +2 pts
|   |   | 
I still don't belive any of this.....

12. NCeagles93 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +3 pts
|   |   | 
Pipoto thanks for the enthusiasm but Wikipedia can be altered by anyone,

thanks though.

12.1. scorpiodsu111 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +2 pts
|   |   | 
LOL.... why can't eagles fans just be quiet and see what happens? We always gotta jump on something and keep running with it. I'm tired of these same silly posts.

13. yodoof , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +2 pts
|   |   | 
dont go too crazy. first of all wikipedia is wronf A LOT because it is written by ppl like u and me. 2nd if we went after a wr at all costs such as trading lito, it could result in teams (esp in the division) usuing 3 or 4 wr's because hanson and paschal could not play nickel well. maybe demos could but if the coaches dont think demps or hanson can play nickel, they wont trade lito. it would be amazing if we traded something like the panthers 1st and darren howard for 85 and kept lito thopugh

13.1. scorpiodsu111 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
What does it matter if teams play 3 and 4. They do they anyway. They did it when it was just Sheppard and Brown, They'll do it with all 3 or they will do it with Samuel and Brown. You act as if we always had 3 top corners or the team at the same time and we couldn't win with 2. Its great to have corners but good corners only look great if you have an great pash rush.... ask Charless Woodson and Al Harris, Dre Bly and Champ Bailey. You do not keep players based on what team can do to you. You build a team focused on what you can do to them. We would be a very good defense without Sheppard and a top 3 offense with a great WR.

13.1.1. yodoof , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
they did 3 wr's when it was brown hood and sheppard but it was ok because hood was good. then wqhen it was will james we sucked. and wat if samuel or brown gets hurt, then hanson is playing #2 and we absolutely susk. u have to look at wat u can do to other teams and wat other teams can do to u

13.1.1.1. DTRIK19 , May 16, 2008
  0 pts
|   |   | 
news flash...Joselio is good. He did great last season, not sure how ya missed that one. Besides neither Brown nor Asante are injury prone

13.2. rhcp879 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
pashcal and demps are safeties, and wouldn't be used in the nickel, hanson has already proved he can play the nickel, just in case you missed last year.

15. ferkid20 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
I doubt it but what if we traded panthers 1st, darren howard, and buckhalter.

15.1. scorpiodsu111 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
And the panthers would accept that because.....

15.1.1. DTRIK19 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
the Panthers don't have to accept anything...we own their pick

...duh

15.1.1.1. yodoof , May 16, 2008
  0 pts
|   |   | 
hey u do know that hanson did good against 4th wr's and then did bad against the 3rd wr's when lito got hurt right? just because a player isnt injury prone as u ppl say doesnt mean he can get hurt. it doesnt even mean he has a lesser chance of getting hurt than an "injury prone" player. sure some ppl have stronger bones than others but most injuries r based on luck and not falling in strange ways. if samuel twists his foot while going for a pick he could be out right before the sb just like wat happened to chad lewis

15.1.1.2. rhcp879 , May 16, 2008
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
don't know any 3rd WR's that hanson did bad against.

15.1.1.3. DTRIK19 , May 16, 2008
  0 pts
|   |   | 
yea you're just plain wrong on Hanson...get over it

15.1.2. phillyphan54 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
no the panthers first that we already have. to trade that 1st round pick, howard, and buck for Chad Johnson.

16. yodoof , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
yea that would be good actually assuming hunt got better. if not we could trade hunt instead of buck

17. NCeagles93 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  -1 pts
|   |   | 
cool dude. it would be funny if someone went under OCHO's profile on there and said he was traded to the eagles, or Under Bradys put "Cheater, cheater, cheater", or have mcnabb have 2 or 3 SB's.

haha

18. V4victory , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +2 pts
|   |   | 
If this does happen, kick ass!
But, nobody wants Terrell, part 2. But i do think Chad is deeper character than that crybaby.
But if it doesn't, whatever. We'll just make do, and have to shock the world with what we have.
That said, Reggie needs to step up. Curtis needs to keep doing what he's doin. And the O-line needs to up their protect scheme.

19. NCeagles93 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
man if anyone knows a panthers fan, which i know alot of, i know that they think the EAGLES are CRAP because they beat us ONCE. and when their team loses alot they just give up on them. they act like they dont exist.

its funny, sick, and disgusting all at the same time.

20. kyro05 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
I back u up ferkid20 but I hope we don't give up too much to get him cuz we are not that desperate 4 WRs. We don't need to give up anymore first round picks

20.1. yodoof , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
yes we do

20.1.1. rhcp879 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +2 pts
|   |   | 
are you a converted redskins fan or something?

20.1.1.1. LILEAGLE , May 17, 2008
  0 pts
|   |   | 
now thats funny!!!!

20.1.1.2. yodoof , May 17, 2008
  -1 pts
|   |   | 
hanson did bad against thrash just as one example. its hialrious that u want a corner that is short and slow bvut has good coverage skill to play our 3rd and possibly 2nd corner in case of injury. U KNOW that the eagles get beat up. he may be average at #3 until someone gets hurt. wat if he gets hurt, then we have paschal at #3 and even u ppl will admit he would suck there

20.1.1.3. rhcp879 , May 17, 2008
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
hanson did a good job last year, and nobody is saying were getting rid of sheppard. even if we do, we can pick up a veteran corner that gets cut.

20.1.1.4. rhcp879 , May 17, 2008
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
paschal is a safety! Nick Graham would be the #3 IF we traded Lito, and IF asante ro sheldon got hurt. I like Graham a lot.

21. NCeagles93 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
I say a 1st and Lito would do it

21.2. Sdotterer14 , May 17, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
a 1st and lito is too much to give up

23. NCeagles93 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
i say that because the Redskins offered a 1st and 3rd that could become a 1st. They wanted 2 first's.
i think a 1st and a proven #1 CB is better then what the redskins could ever offer.

24. fightinirish42 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
I'm backin you up ferkid. I still think we have a shot at Chad, especially reading what Don said. I dont wanna get my hopes up like I had for Fitz though. Also, remember how Chad said he wants to be traded before the draft? He hasn't said anything since... he knows something could be up.

25. DTRIK19 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
Learn to spell guarantee before you make any "guarentees." I'll save my laughter until after June 1st

26. ferkid20 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
15.1. scorpiodsu111 , 7 minutes ago | Reply 0 pts | | |
And the panthers would accept that because.....


WOW!! Do you not know that the eagles traded with the panthers and in return got their 1st round pick? Did you even watch the draft?

27. NCeagles93 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
yeah, that reply did sound, weird, alot.
what day of the week is June 1st?
i hope its a week end.

27.1. DTRIK19 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
Its a Sunday...so everybody better go to church on that day...nuff said

28. ferkid20 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
A Sunday!! also the eagles play the bengals this year... Imagine that!

29. pipoto77 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
SUNDAY JUNE 1st.......... lol

I back u up Ferkid20

30. tonytsakiris , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  0 pts
|   |   | 
Where can I find the comments posted by McNabb? The Eagles would make a serious run this year if they got Ocho. Look at 2004 for proof of that.

30.1. ping11 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  -2 pts
|   |   | 
i agree..no #1 means no superbowl...again

30.1.1. rhcp879 , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
how so. we make it to the playoffs almost every year. when we got to the superbowl, T.O didn't play in a single playoff game... idiot.

30.1.1.2. ping11 , May 17, 2008
  -1 pts
|   |   | 
how many superbowls have we made it to without a #1. and if making the playoffs is a goal for you than you probably are happy with the last few years. however, superbowls make a team a winner...nit wit

30.1.1.3. rhcp879 , May 18, 2008
  +1 pts
|   |   | 
how many teams made it to the superbowl without a #1? Seahawks, Steelers, Bears, Patriots,
(3 times), the eagles made it ( during playoffs, even the giants don't have a #1, only the colts and patriots recently made it with a #1, and the patriots lost. WR is only 1 position on a team.

30.1.2. RONovanMcME , May 16, 2008  |  Reply
  +2 pts
|   |   | 
i think the chances of the eagles going to and winning a bowl this year are the same that the giants were this time last year...adding a top notch wr only greatly helps the cause...doesnt really make or break it...healthy players...the right play calling....the right personnel on the field...thats what gets it done...not ONE wr..