The Browns should have played Colt McCoy at the quarterback position in 2012 and not using a first round draft pick to pick a quarterback that is 4 years older than McCoy. Yes this was written in an article featured on Bleacher Report. Don’t worry I’ll give you non-believers a link to read it for yourselves. They also go on to rank the top 65 quarterback who played in 2012. Guess what people? Weeden finished on the list at 45th and McCoy finished at 28th on the list. The article is adamantly against the Cleveland Browns playing Brandon Weeden over Colt McCoy, they go on to say McCoy was never given the proper shot he deserved in Cleveland. Hey you can read that article right here. Now the Cleveland Browns find themselves in a position to trade Brandon Weeden. I wrote an article just yesterday that said the Consensus around the NFL is the Browns want to trade Weeden. There are dozens if not hundreds of articles saying the Browns want to trade Weeden on the internet, yet...
Original Story:
|
February 15, 2013
Pat Shurmur knew he was on the hot seat with new owner Jimmy Haslam coming in. So why would Shurmur go with whom he thought did not give him the best chance to win? The only reason Heckert got fired was because when a new owner takes over a team he just wants to have his people he knows and trusts in those positions. Had the Browns finished 10-6 Heckert and Shurmur would have been retained, perhaps Holmgren as well but they would still be on a very short leash. Banner would have still been added and Lombardi would have had to wait until the current regime faltered.