Originally posted on Waiting For Next Year  |  Last updated 7/2/12

The reports started a few days ago that the Browns and Brandon Weeden were at an impasse in contract negotiations. The issue at hand appears to be the 4th year guarantee. The new NFL slotting rule for rookies has worked pretty well overall, but the fourth year guarantee has become the biggest point of contention. As Mary Kay Cabot pointed out in her article, it was the main issue that held up Phil Taylor’s deal as the 21st pick a year ago. Brandon Weeden was the 22nd pick, so what’s the big deal? It seems that from 21 to 22 is where the precedent is currently being set, in a way.

I looked up the 22nd pick from a year ago, Colts offensive lineman Anthony Costanzo, and I came across this from Andrew Brandt at Forbes.

As for the picks below Clayborn,  the 21st pick, Phil Taylor of the Browns, has a contract similar to those mentioned above, while the 22nd pick (Anthony Costanzo, Colts), 23rd pick (Danny Watkins, Eagles) and 24th pick (Cameron Jordan, Saints) just gave up their quest for the fourth year and have agreed to have only the first three years guaranteed.

The Browns, it appears, truly are at the forefront in terms of setting precedent with Brandon Weeden. Technically, the Browns already could be viewed as the team giving up ground a year ago when they finally gave in for Phil Taylor at 21.

Is it possible that in league circles they are being pressured to hold the line on the guaranteed fourth year? Are the Browns truly holding the line because they happen to have picked a 28-year-old QB who isn’t a typical rookie age? There are certainly more questions than answers right now and only the Browns and maybe Weeden’s representatives know for sure.

If it was up to me, I would just go ahead and give him the fourth year. Generally speaking, quarterbacks are their own category in the draft anyway. Everyone, from media, players, agents and team executives expect there to be some kind of small premium for that position in terms of compensation. That being the case, go ahead and get Weeden signed up for a fourth year. If some other team wants to fight it out with their 22nd pick in a future year, let them have at it. NFL teams are already ahead of the game with the new rookie wage scale.

Consider that Tim Tebow was picked 25th in 2010 and has a very complicated incentive-laden contract. His agent would tell you it is worth up to $33 million. It isn’t worth anywhere near that much, but consider that Tebow’s cap hit number is $3.072 million for 2012 and $2.085 million for 2013. It could escalate thereafter if he hits playing time marks, etc. Upon being traded he was paid $6.275 million. Obviously I think the money was worth it because Tebow knocked the Steelers out of the playoffs, but that’s neither here nor there.

Brandon Weeden is quite obviously going to get the nod to be the starter in Cleveland. He is a mature guy and probably isn’t going to sweat a lot of the details and business wrangling like another rookie might. Still, every guy has his breaking point. Hopefully the Browns don’t hold the line too hard to the point that it’s counter-productive. The rookie rules are now in favor of teams. To pretend like they have to battle to the ends of the earth on a fourth year for a first-round draft pick is counter-productive.

MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Lonzo Ball explains why he skipped Lakers-Suns fight

Dale Earnhardt Jr. shares early-career regrets

LaVar Ball downplays President Trump’s role in helping son

Philip Rivers cleared to play Sunday against Bills

Simone Biles blasts Gabby Douglas over response to sexual abuse post

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

D'Angelo Russell underwent arthroscopic knee surgery Friday

Derrick Rose to miss at least two weeks with ankle injury

Jameis Winston: Uber driver’s ‘accusation is false’

Jerry Jones apologizes after video of racially charged comment emerges

Russell Wilson couldn't talk, was on liquid diet for days due to nearly broken jaw

Report: Tennessee has 'considerable reservations' about hiring Jon Gruden

Sports & Politics Intersect: Is Jerry out of his league?

The 'An I, Tonya for an eye (or knee)' quiz

Should the Broncos make Tyrod Taylor their next quarterback?

15 mid-majors you need to know before you hear about them in March

NCAA college football 2017 Week 12 predictions

NFL Week 11 predictions

Follow Ben Simmons as he leads us to the NBA's unknown future

The Saints flipped the script to revive their season

The 15 best and 15 worst MLB signings of the last decade

The 'It's a major award!' quiz

Vikings' unnecessary quarterback conundrum is Mike Zimmer's doing

Time to admit the Blues are good, but can they be great?

NFL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Yardbarker Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Sports & Politics Intersect: Is Jerry out of his league?

15 mid-majors you need to know before you hear about them in March

The 'An I, Tonya for an eye (or knee)' quiz

Should the Broncos make Tyrod Taylor their next quarterback?

The 15 best and 15 worst MLB signings of the last decade

The 'It's a major award!' quiz

Follow Ben Simmons as he leads us to the NBA's unknown future

The Saints flipped the script to revive their season

NFL Week 11 predictions

NCAA college football 2017 Week 12 predictions

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker