<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Yardbarker: JT Snow</title>
    <link>http://www.yardbarker.com/rss/player/596</link>
    <description>Recent articles about JT Snow</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>The RBI-To-GIDP Ratio Theory</title>
      <description>For the Sabermetric crowd, a cost-benefit ratio to measure run producers since 1946.  

"The idea behind this that I recall reading online some place (where, I don't know), is that if a batter has alot of RBIs, it's partly because he has lots of opportunities. Of course, he then has more chances to ground into double plays (the GIPDs). So if he has a high RBI-to-GIDP ratio, it means he is able to drive in alot of runs while not hurting his teams with double plays. It is kind of like a cost-benefit ratio. If you drive in runs you are providing your team with benefits. But if you hit into double plays, your team incurs a cost. By bringing both stats together, I partly offset the opportunity issue in judging the meaning of these two stats. It certainly is not a complete picture of hitting, since getting on base is not well incorporated (and you can drive in runs in non-GIDP situations). But the rankings turned up some interesting surprises, so it was fun to work on."</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 01:24:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.yardbarker.com/author/article/2130</link>
      <guid>http://www.yardbarker.com/author/article/2130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
