Posted January 27, 2013 on AP on Fox
Andy_murray_696d
(Eds: With AP Photos.) By JOHN LEICESTER AP Sports Columnist Andy Murray looks like a one-hit wonder. In the Australian Open final, Murray had Novak Djokovic almost dangling on the end of a hook, facing three break points in what proved to be a momentum-shifting game early in the second set. But he couldn't reel in the Serb, who now has six major titles and the top of men's tennis to himself with age slowly blunting Roger Federer's abilities and Rafael Nadal's future clouded by creaky knees. This was Murray's chance to capitalize on his breakthrough year in 2012, when he won his first major title and Olympic gold. Had Murray won again Sunday, Britons could have joked that major titles for British men are like London buses: you wait ages for one and then two come along in quick succession. Murray ruined the punch line. His 7-6 (2),6-7 (3), 3-6, 2-6 loss in Melbourne to Djokovic was gritty but felt like a step back not a step forward. At this stage of his career, Murray needs to be regularly winning major finals, not just reaching them, if he wants to be remembered for more than just one exceptional year in 2012. That Murray allowed a feather falling onto the court to throw off his serve in the second set tiebreaker and squandered match-changing break points made one wonder whether his curse is that he has the physical tools to be a great tennis player but not the mind. Backing up that argument is Murray's now near-dismal record in major finals: played six, won just one - against Djokovic at the U.S. Open last September. That was the first major for a British man since Fred Perry in 1936. It was historic but not, in itself, an answer to the question of whether Murray is simply a very good player or has the makings of a great one. A victory for Murray on Sunday to go with his U.S. Open crown and his Olympic gold won at home last August would have looked like a power shift at the top of men's tennis, especially since Murray beat Federer for the first time in four attempts at a major to reach Sunday's final. Instead, the loss to Djokovic made Murray's 2012 wins look more like exceptions than the possible beginnings of a new rule. Still, the successes of 2012 and a whole year of coaching and confidence boosting from Ivan Lendl have clearly made a startling difference. Unlike the pre-Lendl Murray, the new Murray doesn't so often look as if he swallowed a cocktail of vinegar and lemon juice. He still grimaces and mutters to himself and yells at his entourage when shots go awry. But he has ditched the loser's body language and hang-dog look that too often used make his defeats seem like self-fulfilling prophecies. Still, Murray's positive outlook and the more aggressive, take-it-to-the-opponent shot-making that flows from it weren't enough to beat Djokovic this time. The Serb's wells of confidence and resolve seem deeper than anyone's in tennis with the possible exception of Nadal. The Australian final showed that physically, Djokovic and Murray are evenly matched, powerful on both the backhand and forehand sides, with delicate control, supreme fitness and rubber-ball quickness around the court. But until Murray can consistently go toe-to-toe with Djokovic's mental toughness, their rivalry won't feel as titanic as clashes between Djokovic and Nadal or Federer and Nadal when they are at their best. Djokovic is exuberant, a joker apt to wear a blonde wig or Darth Vader mask onto court. Murray is so understated he said the most enjoyable part of winning the U.S. Open was getting back to his hotel room and ''spending a bit of time on my own.'' But those differences are cosmetic. The difference that counted most on Sunday was killer instinct. Djokovic had it. Murray did not. Murray should have landed a crippling blow when he had Djokovic on the ropes at the end of the first set and beginning of the second. In his most convincing period of the match, Murray won 17 of 19 points, racing to a 4-0 lead in winning the first-set tiebreaker, holding his serve to love at the start of the second set and then putting the squeeze on Djokovic to 0-40 on his serve. That Murray didn't convert those break points into a 2-0, second-set lead was telling, especially given the fact that Djokovic had looked so out of sorts, annoyed with his shoes, shots and movement. Winning that game, alone, wouldn't have won Murray the match. But it certainly would have given him hard-to-stop momentum that might have taken his mind off the painful blister developing on his right foot. ''At this level, it can come down to just a few points here or there. My probably biggest chance was at the beginning of the second set; (I) didn't quite get it. When Novak had his chance at the end of the third, he got his,'' Murray said. Another turning point was Murray's loss of concentration at 2-2 in the second tiebreaker. Interrupting his service action because a white feather was floating onto the court, then catching it and getting rid of it only to serve a double-fault suggested that Murray still lets too many outside influences interfere with his focus. ''It just caught my eye before I served. I thought it was a good idea to move it,'' Murray said. ''Maybe it wasn't because I obviously double-faulted.'' So Murray remains a work in progress, not the finished product. Lendl still has work to do. Lendl understands Murray because, like the Scot, he lost his first four major finals before winning his fifth - the 1984 French Open. Lendl's jagged career path of sustained disappointment followed by eventual long-term success should again offer hope to Murray. After his 1984 breakthrough, Lendl lost his sixth major final, as Murray has now done, and his seventh, too. But the career record Lendl retired with - eight titles from 19 major finals - is one Murray would doubtless give his hind teeth for. A moral of Lendl's story is try and then try again, making him the perfect coach to extricate Murray from the trough of this latest defeat. Together, Djokovic, Nadal, Federer and Murray form a Fab Four who have separated themselves from the rest of the men's field with the sustained excellence of their play. But Murray remains the group's Ringo Starr - still bringing up the rear. He needs more hits of his own for that to change. --- John Leicester is an international sports columnist for The Associated Press. Write to him at jleicester(at)ap.org or follow him at http://twitter.com/johnleicester
THE BACKYARD
BEST OF MAXIM
RELATED ARTICLES

In His Own Words – Andy Murray’s Final 2013 Australian Open News Conference

Andy Murray 27-01-13 Sunday, 27 January, 2013 Q.  Did you feel if you were going to win it, you were going to have to win it quicker than you won the US Open given the physical demands of your semifinal? ANDY MURRAY:  No, I mean, you never know.  I think it was extremely    the third set was very competitive.  You know, a lot of the games that I lost in the fourth set as well...

Djokovic vs. Murray at Australian Open final

Novak Djokovic remembers when he was about 11 and meeting a boy his age named Andy Murray. The young Murray from Dunblane, Scotland, was ''quite pale,'' recalled the Serbian, known as ''The Joker'' for his wisecracks. Back then, they were playing on the juniors' circuit ''just trying to play tennis and enjoy the game,'' Djokovic...

Another feather in Djokovic's cap

Can a match be decided by a feather? Silly as it seems, a feather that floated past Andy Murray in the second set tiebreaker and contributed to a double fault might have helped change the course of an Australian Open final that, in the end, was dominated by Novak Djokovic, who wrapped up his third straight title at Melbourne Park with a 6-7 (2), 7-6 (3), 6-3, 6-2 victory. Murray...

Who Will Be the Victor at the Australian Open: Novak Djokovic or Andy Murray?

Andy Murray takes on Novak Djokovic in the 2013 Australian Open men’s final January 25, 2013 — This year’s Australian Open has seen surprise runs, intense five-set battles involving the top three, and of course, controversy. But with the final stage of the men’s singles draw about to commence, it’s time to take a look at who is most likely to win the season’s first Slam...

Djokovic wins 3rd straight Aussie title

Novak Djokovic beat Andy Murray 6-7 (2), 7-6 (3), 6-3, 6-2 in Sunday's final to become the first man in the Open era to win three consecutive Australian Open titles. After two sets without a service break, top-ranked Djokovic broke Murray in the eighth game of the third set to seize momentum in the match. It was Djokovic's sixth major title and his fourth at Melbourne Park...

Overnight Ratings Mixed For Aussie Open Finals

Despite moving from ESPN2 to ESPN, the overnight ratings were still minuscule for the middle-of-the-night Australian Open singles finals. The Novak Djokovic/Andy Murray Australian Open men’s final drew a 0.5 overnight rating on ESPN Sunday [...]

Novak Djokovic Wins Fourth Australian Open

The last time Andy Murray and Novak Djokovic met at tour level – as opposed to the social level – was at the World Tour Finals in London, while the time before that was the final of the Shanghai Masters, in a terrific match that fell barely shy of being adjudged a classic. The time before that was the US Open final, a match that rearranged history as we know it, even if the raw...

Djokovic Defends his Australian Open Title in Test of Endurance

By Jaclyn Stacey (January 27, 2013) MELBOURNE PARK, Australia - Novak Djokovic created history on Sunday when he became the first male tennis player in the Open Era to win three consecutive Australian Open titles, overcoming a defiant Andy Murray 6-7(2), 7-6(3), 6-3, 6-2 in three hours and 40 minutes.   “Every tournament, especially the major tournaments, is very special. So every...
Tennis News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
Help
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.