Articles:
  Comments:
  Fan Base:
  Total Score:
Member Since:
October 10, 2007
Homepage:
www.tradeshauna.com
Hometown:
Emeryville, CA
Favorite UW Football Player(s):
Marques Tuiasosopo, Pat Conniff, Jason Chorak, Larry Triplett
Favorite San Francisco Giant(s):
Tim Lincecum, Barry Bonds (yes, Barry Bonds), Robby Thompson,
Favorite Seattle Seahawk(s):
Mack Strong
 
Favorite Beer:
Budweiser
Favorite UW Basketball Player(s):
Brandon Roy, Jon Brockman, Todd MacCulluch, Jamie Booker
Favorite Food(s):
Fried Chicken Sandwich from Bakesale Betty, #1 (beef) from Robertos
 


 

Big Surpise: Seahawks plan to throw to the RBs this season

After an offseason of ignoring my Seahawks (and giving my undivided attention to the SF Giants, as hard as that might be), I've finally mustered the energy to start caring again. Probably because of this piece of encouraging news: THE SEAHAWKS PLAN ON THROWING TO THE RBS MORE THIS SEASON!

Here's the Seattle Times coverage: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/seahawks/2008085168_hawk01.html

Perhaps the headline should have been something like "Seahawks Plan to ACTUALLY Throw to RBs This Year." Because, you know, with "what's his name" the last few years, that part of the offense (an integral part of the WC offense, no less) was, um, missing.

Washington Huskies - "Victory and Ruins" series

Guess there aren't that many UW Huskies on here yet. I've been away for a while and thought for sure that I'd see a some discussion about the Seattle Times' series, titled "Victory and Ruins," about UW's last 'good' football team. (2000)

The intro article claims the series is "an unprecedented look behind the scenes -- based largely on documents unavailable at the time -- [that] reveals a disturbing level of criminal conduct and hooliganism by the players on that team."

...I call it "every reason why Ty Willingham was hired and should be kept on for the foreseeable future."

Frankly, the stories are embarrassing (some even a bit surprising); I have great memories watching that team. But reading about how Curtis Williams (of all people!!!) got away with so many wrongs, only to be immortalized as the emotional spark for that team (he was paralyzed in the Stanford game) is not an easy thing grasp.

The stories needed to be told, and I'm glad that the Times did this. Until a few years ago, I stuck up for guys like Jerramy Stevens (he's a good guy with major issues - I still believe that - but the world was duped by anyone who claimed the problems he had were exaggerated or behind him). Of course back then it was difficult to understand the damage that was being done off the field.

...sure, this series doesn't right the ship - but it's a step in the right direction. At least it's a major support point as to why the school needs to focus on building a RESPECTABLE program before it can take steps towards building a powerhouse again.

(I could go into stories I've heard about the stark contrast in conduct of football players at Stanford during the Willingham years, and then during the Teevens years, but won't waste your time. Let's just say Teevens loosened the reigns a bit too much).

-Malty

An Open Letter to Ed Hansen and other University of Washington Boosters

Dear Mr. Hansen (and all like-minded people) --

I am an alumnus of the University of Washington and, like you, have been troubled by the recent status of Husky football.

Luckily for me, my years at UW were during the only real glory years of the program's recent history: transitioning from the lingering effects of the NCAA sanctions to a Rose Bowl victory in 2001 (for which I was in attendance, with purple hair). But beyond those years, the program has been mediocre at best -- god-awful at worst -- hitting rock bottom under the leadership of Keith Gilbertson and the mess left by Rick Neuheisel. Needless to say, I've witnessed and experienced the highs and lows that have come with being a Husky over the last decade-plus, and feel both justified and qualified writing this.

With the enormous donations that you make every year to the University I'm sure you'll disagree with me on the point, but: I'm a bigger fan than you. I care more about the University -- from Drumheller Fountain, to Kane Hall, to Hec Ed, to Husky Stadium -- than you could ever imagine. I earn my stripes as a fan. I stand on wooden benches in the pouring rain. I yell to the point of nearly fainting, and always to the point of losing my voice. I get angry. I get sad. I get ecstatic. I experience euphoria. I linger over loses for days on end (unable to read the recaps because it hurts so bad) and I walk around on cloud nine for days after big wins. I had a smile from ear-to-ear as I rushed the Martin Stadium field when we clinched our spot in the Rose Bowl. A year before I vomited my guts out when we blew our Rose Bowl hopes at UCLA. I keep every pompon and program from the games I go to. I reminisce about the forgotten workhorses that made this program special and still shake my head at the blue chippers that failed to materialize (prize recruits by "your guys," I assume). I'm enshrined in the Husky Hall of Fame -- or at least that's what I like to call it when I look at my painted, 21-year-old face in the panoramic photo taken at the last home game before Hec Ed was renovated.

Meanwhile you -- and your co-conspirators -- float up to Husky Stadium in your catamarans, pay for the privilege to sip mimosas and eat crab cakes in the Don James Center, wear your knitted purple sweaters and boat shoes, and occasionally contemplate "braving the elements" in your padded seat, tucked high up under the overhanging northern upper deck, sitting "on the 50" because you -- and your exorbitant amounts of money -- wouldn't have it any other way. (News flash: End zone seats are better if you're a real football fan) Then you just sit there, not so much as adding a "Go!" to the haunting "GO!!! HUSKIES!!!!" chant which gives me shivers even as I write this. I know this, because I spent years sitting below "you people" and it made me sick to think that the "biggest" fans, were also the weakest. I willed the team to victories; you just tried to buy them.



I mean, I get it. Without your money there would be no program. No success. No fun. But until today, I thought I could ignore it. But I can't -- not any more. Not learning about the stunts you try to pull with your influence and blood money. Guys like you ruin it for guys like me.

Truthfully, it pains me to say all of this, because on all other levels we share one of the closest bonds that two people can share in this country. We are alums of the same school. We'd high five each other -- maybe even bro-hug -- over a meaningless play in a child's game. You'd probably honk and wave if we drove by each other on the street and you saw my purple car, UW stickers, and UW alum plate frame. You'd probably hire me over an equally-qualified candidate, because of the name of the University on my degree. We're both Huskies, man.



But something is troubling me here. I think you -- successful Husky alum -- have started to lose sight of what's really important. You have become so impatient over the status of the football team that you're threatening to withhold scholarship money for law students. In other words, because the football team (part of the self-sustaining athletic department) didn't make a bowl, you're going to take out your frustrations on the scholastic side of the University?

Answer me this: how did the success of the football team pave the way for your professional success in life? (If you say anything beyond "it didn't make one bit of difference" then you are lying)

Thanks to the preparation I received at the University of Washington, I've become quite successful in my own line of work, and am very satisfied with what I've become as a person. Of course, I'm still getting my footing and can't afford to write annual checks to UW like you can. But when I do reach that point where I can afford to give back to the same University that gave so much to me, it would be crazy (or, rather, selfish) of me to withhold that gift because the football team wasn't performing up to par.

Just the thought sickens me.

...But back to the football program for a second because, sadly, that's what this is all about.

I can only assume - with your status as prominent booster - that you're intimately familiar with the health of the football program over the last 8 years. But let me just recap for you: Rick Neuheisal was hired to replace Jim Lambright who, in hindsight, was unjustifiably let go by a terrible athletic director in Barbara Hedges. Neuheisel (who was hired in favor of Gary Pinkel, by the way) proceeded to win with Lambright's guys, but slowly and surely lead the program (with his "high-ranked recruiting classes") down the ranks of the Pac-10 elite. Over the course of his tenure he was a notorious and evasive rule-bender and liar. He was a "players" coach who has since admitted to not instilling any discipline in his team, which became a group of perennial underachievers. After a stupid mistake (blame it on the UW compliance department all you want -- anyone with brains knows that you don't gamble on NCAA sports if you work in NCAA athletics) he was fired, leaving a terrible mess that even a casual fan realized would take years to clean up. Of course "years to clean up" didn't take into consideration the choice of Keith Gilbertson as head coach. With all due respect to Coach Gilberston, he was not the man to take on such a monumental task. After a few years, nothing had changed. In fact, it had just become worse.



In comes Tyrone Willingham: a proven winner at schools with high academic standards; a guy who players trust and love; a good man with a clear, influential eye for talent (see: Notre Dame, '05-'06 and Jake Locker).

Now, I'm not going to say that Willingham is the guy that will make this program a national powerhouse. Personally, I don't believe he has what it takes to put UW on the level of LSU, Ohio State and USC year in and year out. But he has proven he has the ability to take teams (bad teams, no less) to heights they hadn't seen in years. Stanford in the Rose Bowl? Happened under Ty's watch. ND back in the BCS mix? Happened under Ty's watch.

What I saw in Stanford and ND is the same thing I see the potential for at UW: a great school with a good football team. But you - Ed Hansen and like-minded people - seem like you'd rather see a good school with a great football team... and that's just wrong.

Universities, first and foremost, are institutions of higher learning. They are the launching points for the rest of our lives as professional, working adults. Few of these players find their way onto professional rosters, while even fewer (if any) actually make it in the league. Even then, it saddens me to see how many professional athletes throw away their lives and fortunes because, seemingly, they received no semblance of an education. Ty Willingham though seems to me like the type of guy that will prepare these players for life through his discipline, teaching, mentorship, and -- yes -- coaching abilities.



So get off your high horses. Take a step back. Realize what's important in this world. And for god's sake -- give Willingham a chance. It's been three years for a program that was clearly 4-5 away from any sort of respectability.

Your money disgusts me -- not because you have it, but because of how you choose to use and exploit it. Tyrone Willingham is the best thing to happen to this football team in years. Give him a chance to turn this program into something respectful again -- then we can concentrate on making it something special.

Sincerely,

Michael Altfest

UW Class of 2000

GO DAWGS!

Convincing myself the Seahawks have a chance - Part II (Defense)

The Seahawks have a tough task ahead of them this Saturday. No matter how good you are, Lambeau in January is Lambeau in January.

I was already able to convince myself (barely) that the Hawks held the edge on offense, but the defensive comparison wasn't that much of a struggle. Al Harris continues to make me nauseous...while the Hawks have the edge at pretty much every position.

No Surprise Here: UG Prez the latest to propose a playoff system

Leave it to an SEC School to make a bad thing worse... (ha!)

"The president of the University of Georgia is calling for an eight-team playoff system for college football's top division, saying the Bowl Championship Series -- which left Georgia out of its championship game -- has become a 'beauty contest largely stage-managed by the networks.'"

Apparently someone forgot to tell Michael Adams that the Bulldogs not only failed to win their conference - but didn't even win their division within the conference.

Look, the system isn't perfect - it never will be. Hence my proposal: Take it back to the way it used to be. Play for your bowl and let the voters decide. It's more fun that way and allows everyone to debate without this added level of sour grapes. Look, the AP is now independent of the BCS and is free to make their own decisions (see: USC in 2004). If the Bulldogs were really that deserving, then well, the AP could have made that call...which they didn't.

Convincing myself the Seahawks have a chance - Part I

Showing up at Lambeau in January and expecting to win is, um, stupid. But I'm a homer Seahawks fan and am trying to convince myself that Green Bay isn't all they seem to be. Tonight, I started with a quick look at the offenses.

Malty71's Articles

Most Recent  |  Most Comments


Malty71's Recent Activity
Thursday, October 02
NEW COMMENT

Malty71 commented on a College Football article by Malty71: "An Open Letter to Ed Hansen and other University of Washington Boosters"
 

 
Malty71 has not made any predictions!
 

 
 
© Copyright 2008 Yardbarker, Inc. All Rights Reserved