Army Black Knights outside linebacker Andre Carter II (34) reacts after a play against the Navy Midshipmen during the first half of the 123rd Army-Navy game at Lincoln Financial Field. Danny Wild-USA TODAY Sports

Army star Andre Carter II, a potential first-round NFL Draft pick, is facing an uncertain future after an abrupt change to the policy surrounding student-athletes at service academies.

A report from Leo Shane III and Jonathan Lehrfeld of the Military Times revealed that the annual defense authorization bill that is set to pass Congress would remove provisions that had allowed some athletes to request a waiver allowing them to play professional sports instead of fulfilling their military obligations. Under the new language, not fulfilling the mandatory two years of active duty after graduation would constitute a “breach of agreement to serve as an officer.” The bill has already passed through Congress and is headed to President Biden’s desk.

The policy had changed in 2019 to allow for a potential deferral of service, but despite that, those who began playing at a service academy with that policy in place will not receive any sort of legacy exemption.

The change blindsided Carter, his parents, and even Army head coach Jeff Monken, who said he was completely against the new rule.

“It’s just kind of pulling the rug out from under him,” Monken told Pete Thamel of ESPN. “It’s not fair. It’s not fair to him. He was loyal to this team and institution. He could have left and he didn’t. He still wants to serve. It’s not that he doesn’t want to serve. He wants to pursue the NFL and play, and then serve.”

Carter’s mother Melissa said her son would likely have to choose between playing in the NFL and serving in the military, despite the fact that he has been loyal to Army and fulfilled all his obligations under the present guidelines.

Carter has starred as a linebacker for the Black Knights and was viewed as a potential first- or second-round NFL Draft pick. Teams could still select him even if the rule changes, but with no guarantee that he would be able to play, the likelihood is that a change would significantly impact his draft stock.

More must-reads:

TODAY'S BEST
Two young stars get hefty bonuses for making All-NBA teams
Mavericks star duo joins exclusive club with Game 1 win
Mavericks ride 'Luka Magic' on both ends late to win Game 1
Panthers shut out Rangers 3-0 in Eastern Conference Final opener
NBA announces 2023-24 All-NBA teams
Star Padres infielder to miss significant time with shoulder injury
LeBron James, Charles Barkley passionately defend Caitlin Clark from 'petty' haters
Roger Goodell discusses factors for possible 18-game NFL season
Cowboys QB Dak Prescott has intriguing comment on his contract situation
Celtics toying around with surprise Jayson Tatum move in conference finals
Former teammate warns Tee Higgins about pitfalls of playing on franchise tag
Watch: Timberwolves and Mavericks trade dunks in third quarter
Yankees owner Hal Steinbrenner tempers expectations for Juan Soto extension
Canucks' Rick Tocchet wins 2024 Jack Adams Award
Incredible Orioles streak finally comes to end against Cardinals
Raiders QB shares surprising reason for switching jersey number
New Jersey Devils to hire just-fired head coach to lead bench
Latest announcements show how deep Knicks' injury issues ran
Veteran WR announces retirement after nine seasons
Eagles stars defend new DC following criticism

Want more sports news?

Join the hundreds of thousands of fans who start their day with Yardbarker's Morning Bark, the best newsletter in sports.