Copa América vs Euros

This summer has been action-packed for football fans, as the two biggest continental competitions, Copa América and Euros, take place simultaneously. Besides the constant entertainment for fans, this presents a tough situation for the organizations as they are directly compared with what occurs on the other side of the Atlantic.

There is no point going over the constant discussion of which competition produces the better football or the better show. At the end of the day, everyone likes his type of football – some enjoy the more tactical European style, and some the more passionate South American. The only thing there is no doubt about is that these two regions have ruled the world of football since the start, winning all the World Cups played to date with 12 for Europe and 10 for South America.

However, there is one aspect of these competitions that can present a fair and direct comparison, the format.

Copa América Format

The Copa América format has faced quite a few changes in the last editions. In 2019 we saw three groups of four teams with the two guest invites of Qatar and Japan. That meant the top two in each group and the two best third places qualified for the quarterfinals. The 2021 edition took place during the pandemic with just the 10 CONMEBOL nations. This format had two groups of five teams each, with the top 4 going through to the quarter-finals.

This year’s Copa América has once again a different format. This time around the competition includes the usual 10 from CONMEBOL side, plus six teams from CONCACAF. Four groups of four teams with the top two qualify for the quarterfinals is a fairly simple and attractive format. However, the knockout stages do not provide the greatest spectacle since the draw separates Groups A and B on one side and C and D on the other, making the tournament feel like two completely unrelated competitions until they meet in the final.

The reason behind this is the “2-in-1” venue choice. The USA is a massive country and faces this tournament as a test before the World Cup 2026. Nonetheless, having stadiums all over the country mean huge travelling distances for teams that can cause crucial disadvantages in a competition with so many games in a short period. That is why they chose to split the tournaments by regions with the risk of game repetition rather than complaints about travelling disadvantages.

Euros Format

The UEFA Euro’s last format change came after the 2012 edition. The competition used to have 16 teams divided into four groups of four with the top two qualifying for the quarterfinals. Since the 2016 edition, the tournament has 24 teams divided into six groups of four, with the the top two of each group plus the best four third-places qualifying for the round of 16.

The changes made sit well with all the countries, increasing their chances of qualifying for the competition and of making it through to the knockout stage. Some fans may also agree due to an extra round of 16 game to attend but there is no doubt this compromises the quality and thrill of the group stage.

The current format means only eight out of the initial 24 teams are eliminated after the three group stage games. Added to that is the fact that the best four third-places qualify is not only unattractive to watch, with teams waiting days to know if they qualify, but it is also strongly unfair for the teams playing in the first groups.

Take Italy as an example. They were 1-0 down against Croatia and had to take huge risks to draw the game in the dying minutes not knowing if three points would be enough to qualify in third. The following day Group C plays the third and final game with a bizarre advantage as Denmark and Slovenia know a draw is enough to qualify with the results of groups A and B.

Conclusion

Whether it is due to venue inconveniences, an increase in games played or both, it is clear the quality of games and fairness of the format are way down on the organization’s lists. Copa América and Euros are just the start, as FIFA confirmed the World Cup 2026 will have a new 48-team format coming to a tournament that never raised any concerns in this area.

More must-reads:

TODAY'S BEST
Watch: Jets eliminate Blues in instant classic double OT Game 7 win
Buddy Hield lifts Warriors to massive Game 7 win over Rockets
Pacers use balanced attack vs. Cavaliers to steal home-court advantage
Fever's Caitlin Clark dazzles in preseason debut vs. Brazil
Scottie Scheffler wins CJ Cup Byron Nelson in historic fashion
Former World No. 1 Naomi Osaka wins first tournament in four years
Watch: Giants' Willy Adames catches fire vs. Rockies
Joey Logano wins wild Wurth 400 at Texas in NASCAR overtime 
Why did Browns take Dillon Gabriel before Shedeur Sanders in draft and how could it affect their QB competition?
Celtics' Kristaps Porzingis reacts to facing Knicks in playoffs
Jalen Ramsey linked to notable NFC team
Why Bayern Munich's 33rd Bundesliga title should be even sweeter for Harry Kane
Chiefs sign first-round pick OT Josh Simmons to rookie deal
Rangers make coaching-staff shakeup amid offensive struggles
Troubling report emerges about Texans WR Tank Dell's knee injury
Key Blues defenseman to miss Game 7 vs. Jets
Wild’s Joel Eriksson Ek to undergo core muscle surgery
'It makes sense': Steelers see new Aaron Rodgers conspiracy theory emerge as team waits for 2025 decision
Jets offer key injury updates ahead of Game 7
Bill Belichick reportedly considering big career move

Want more sports news?

Join the hundreds of thousands of fans who start their day with Yardbarker's Morning Bark, the best newsletter in sports.