Yardbarker
x
How Arizona Wildcats Match Up Against SMU
Nov 28, 2025; Tempe, Arizona, USA; Arizona Wildcats head coach Brent Brennan is doused with Powerade after defeating the Arizona State Sun Devils during the 99th Territorial Cup at Mountain America Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

Arizona’s Profiled — Why They Are Well-Positioned

Looking at Arizona’s 2025 season statistics:

Patrick Breen/The Republic / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Explosive Offense: The Wildcats averaged 32.6 points per game while gaining 404.8 yards per game with solid output in both scoring and total offense. 

Balanced Attack (Pass + Run): According to collegefootballstats.com. They combined for 1,805 rushing yards and 3,053 passing yards over the season. That balance makes their offense less predictable and harder to defend.

Passing Efficiency: Their passing game was efficient enough to support the yardage, a solid complement to a reliable rushing attack. 

Stout Defense: Perhaps most important, Arizona’s defense allowed only 18.9 points per game — a top-tier mark nationally according to statmuse.com.

Third-Down & Ball-Control Efficiency: They posted a respectable 3rd-down conversion rate and maintained solid time-of-possession, which helps in controlling the pace and limiting opponent opportunities. 

Rob Gray-Imagn Images

In short, Arizona brings a well-rounded, balanced roster capable of offense, a defense that rarely gives up points in high amounts, and enough versatility in the roster to adapt against a lot of different competition.

SMU’s Profile — Dangerous but With Vulnerabilities

Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

Looking at the 2025 SMU Mustangs’ numbers according to smumustangs.com

High-Scoring Offense: SMU averaged 32.9 points per game, almost identical to Arizona’s output. That suggests they can keep pace offensively. 

Balanced Offense — Run + Pass: They rushed for 1,882 yards and generated 3,402 passing yards. SMU’s offense isn’t one-dimensional; they can challenge defenses with both the ground game and the aerial attack. 

Solid Efficiency: Their offense operates at roughly 6.3 yards per play, indicating the ability to move the chains consistently. 

Turnover Ability & Opportunistic Defense: SMU’s defense has shown playmaking capability, plus its offense tends to avoid excessive turnovers. 

What to Watch For:

Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

Defensive Inconsistency: SMU has shown cracks, allowing sizeable yardage and giving up points in games where opponent offenses are efficient. For instance, a late-season loss exposed issues with stops and adjustments. 

Potential for Mistakes Under Pressure: Against a disciplined, balanced, and well-coached team like Arizona, SMU’s offensive rhythm could be disrupted. Their success likely depends heavily on not turning the ball over and executing well.

Zachary BonDurant-Imagn Images

SMU’s upside is clear, but it’s a “high risk / high reward” profile: they can score and move the ball, but flaws on defense (and reliance on consistency) make them susceptible. On the other hand, there is always the risk of SMU

Matchup Analysis & Key X-Factors

Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

Arizona’s two-pronged offense (run + pass) combined with efficiency means SMU must be ready for varied looks. Conversely, SMU’s similar balanced attack will test whether Arizona’s defense can maintain discipline: if SMU establishes either a run or pass rhythm, it could challenge the Wildcats.

Arizona’s ability to manage pace, sustain drives, convert third downs, and control time of possession may limit SMU’s offensive opportunities, forcing a need for them to make tough decisions at times.

SMU’s opportunistic defense can create turnovers and if they do, that could shift momentum and put pressure on Arizona’s offense. On the flip side, Arizona’s disciplined defense tends to limit big plays and capitalize on opponent miscues.

Red Zone and Third-Down Efficiency:

In tight games (as Bowl games often are), execution in the red zone and on third/fourth down will matter. A stalled drive or turnover could swing momentum substantially, with a game expected to be as close as this matchup.

 Who Has the Edge — And Under What Conditions

Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

If Arizona executes its balanced offense well, avoids turnovers, and forces SMU into mistakes, it has a clear path to a win. Their defensive consistency and control of tempo give them a statistical edge.

If SMU finds rhythm either through the run or pass and avoids big miscues, while their defense forces a turnover or two, this game becomes very competitive. Their scoring output and offensive versatility give them a realistic shot.

Arizona is the slight favorite, largely because its strengths (defense, balance, efficiency) counter many of SMU’s core strengths, but this will likely be a close, competitive game, and SMU has enough weapons to make it a toss-up if they play clean football and capitalize on opportunities.

This game on paper seems quite even, but the edge could come down to which team is more battle-tested, which seems to lean in favor of Arizona.

What did you think of Arizona's big win over Auburn? To let us know, follow us on our X account by clicking on the link.


This article first appeared on Arizona Wildcats on SI and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!