PGA Tour commissioner Jay Monahan. Alex Gould / USA TODAY NETWORK

Why the PGA-LIV merger isn't a sure thing

"That'd be the last thing you'd want your client to say." 

ESPN's Mark Schlabach reported on the details behind the shocking PGA-LIV merger that shook the golf world last week and according to lawyer Craig Seebald, PGA Tour commissioner Jay Monahan made a comment that could put the partnership in jeopardy.

Per Schlabach, during a discussion with reporters last week, Monahan said the goal of the deal was, "ultimately, to take the competitor off the board — to have them exist as a partner, not an owner — and for us to be able to control the direction going forward."

To Seebald, those words could prove problematic.

"That's surprising he would say this, that one of the benefits is eliminating competition," he said. "I probably talked to 30 or 40 antitrust lawyers, and everybody's just scratching their heads saying 'Why would you say that?'"

As Schlabach notes, "the U.S. Department of Justice was already investigating the PGA Tour's alleged antitrust behavior." The unification of LIV Golf and the Tour will draw even more eyes. 

"The 1914 Clayton Act prohibits mergers and acquisitions that eliminate competition," wrote Schlabach. 

He also spoke with Columbia Law School professor Tim Wu, who believes there's a "100% chance" the merger is investigated by the DOJ and that it could also draw a closer look from European regulators.

"The challenge here...is if you have a monopolist and you have a startup ...Then you decide to just like, 'Hey, let's agree not to compete and share the profits.' That's what the antitrust law bans you from doing," Wu said.

According to Schlabach, Wu highlighted the DOJ blocking a potential merger of American Airlines and JetBlue Airways last year as a sign of how seriously the U.S. government takes cases such as these.

Another challenge for the PGA-LIV merger is the comments made by LIV Golf lawyers accusing the Tour of "being a monopoly and using its power to quash competition" during litigation in the antitrust case that was dropped when the partnership was announced. 

Gerald Maatman, a law professor at Northwestern, told Schlabach, "From a legal standpoint, it's very hard to unring the bell when you make those allegations."

With the two sides now united, there are things both wish they hadn't said.

More must-reads:

TODAY'S BEST
Veteran WR announces retirement from NFL
Mavericks come from behind to down Thunder, take 2-1 series lead
Stars continue road dominance with Game 3 win over Avalanche
Watch: Paul Skenes wastes no time showing why Pirates drafted him No. 1 overall
Watch: Braves were one out away from first no-hitter in 30 years
Roman Wilson hopes to become Steelers' next 'great' WR
Chargers sign veteran edge-rusher
Justin Allgaier dominates at Darlington for first win of 2024
'Great mind': One-time NBA champion endorses candidate for Lakers HC job
Celtics respond with impressive road win vs. Cavaliers in Game 3
Hurricanes' power play finally comes through with season on the line
Watch: An outstanding first half by Donovan Mitchell keeps the Cavaliers alive in Game 3 vs. Celtics
Tigers lose veteran starting pitcher to injury
Watch: Minor league baseball game interrupted by turtle delay
Paul Skenes experiences the Pirates' incompetence in just one game
Rangers ace continues to be plagued by nerve irritation in thumb
Cowboys hint at timeline for extension talks with offensive star
Steelers first-round pick has already 'apologized' to new locker mate
Former Packers WR makes bold prediction about Jordan Love
Broncos release former Super Bowl champion WR

Want more Golf news?

Join the hundreds of thousands of fans who start their day with Yardbarker's Morning Bark, the best newsletter in sports.