In the conversation between Lou Williams and Spank on the Underground Lounge, the topic of trading Joel Embiid arises due to his recurring injury issues during the playoffs. Spank suggests that it might be time to trade Embiid, citing his consistent injury woes as a cause for concern, but Williams doesn't approve of the idea.
Spank: "Joel Embiid I think we should trade. He hurt every playoffs bro. He hurt every game."
Lou Williams: "Who you gonna trade him for?"
Spank: "I figure a couple first rounds and one All-Star."
Lou Williams: "Grass ain't greener on the other side. listen, you not gonna miss Embiid until you don't have a 7-foot 50 point scoring machine in your paint. Y'all is 15 and 35 at the All-Star break. And now you just as frustrated with his two draft picks... Who would you trade for him?"
Spank: "I'll take Booker or Durant."
Lou Willaims: "So you want Kevin Durant in the first-round pick... So I'm gonna give you Kevin Durant and a draft pick for the mother****er that you keep talking about his knee bad."
However, Lou Williams offers a different perspective, cautioning against trading away a player of Embiid's caliber. He emphasizes Embiid's unique skill set as a dominant force in the paint, capable of scoring 50 points on any given night. Williams highlights the team's struggles without Embiid, pointing out their potentially poor record during the All-Star break as evidence of his importance to the team's success.
When Spank proposes trading for players like Devin Booker or Kevin Durant, Williams challenges the idea by questioning whether acquiring another star player would truly solve the team's problems.
Williams' skepticism about the proposed trade reflects a deeper understanding of the dynamics within the team and the value of having a dominant center like Embiid. He acknowledges Embiid's injury history but also recognizes his irreplaceable impact on the court.
The conversation between Williams and Spank underscores the complexities involved in making trades in the NBA, particularly when dealing with star players. It highlights the importance of considering factors beyond individual talent, such as team chemistry and long-term impact, when evaluating potential trades.
Ultimately, the dialogue serves as a reminder that while injuries may be a concern, trading away a player of Embiid's caliber requires careful consideration and thoughtful analysis of the team's needs and goals.
This Trade Doesn't Make Sense At Any Level
Trading Joel Embiid, who is only 30 years old and has been putting up incredible numbers, for Kevin Durant at 35 doesn't seem to make sense at any level. While both players are undoubtedly talented, there are several factors to consider that make this trade questionable.
Firstly, Joel Embiid's performance on the court has been exceptional, especially in the regular season where he was averaging an impressive 34.7 points, 11.0 rebounds, and 5.6 assists. His ability to dominate both offensively and defensively has made him a cornerstone player for the Philadelphia 76ers. Despite his injury history, Embiid's impact on the game cannot be understated.
On the other hand, Kevin Durant, while still a formidable player, has faced challenges since leaving the Golden State Warriors. His stints with the Brooklyn Nets and now the Phoenix Suns have not yielded the same level of success he experienced with the Warriors. At 35 years old, Durant's age is also a concern, as he may not have the same longevity and durability as a younger player like Embiid.
Furthermore, Durant's stat line of 27.1 points, 6.6 rebounds, and 5.0 assists, while impressive, doesn't necessarily outweigh Embiid's contributions, especially considering their respective ages and injury histories. While Durant remains a top-tier player, trading away a younger, dominant force like Embiid for an older player with uncertainties surrounding his future performance seems like a risky move.
While both Joel Embiid and Kevin Durant are elite players in their own right, the idea of trading Embiid for Durant doesn't seem to make sense given Embiid's age, performance, and potential for the future. The risk of acquiring an aging player with injury concerns may not be worth the potential benefits, making this trade a questionable decision at best.
More must-reads: