Washington Commanders co-owner Dan Snyder. Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports

Commanders' Dan Snyder sent letter to NFL owners saying ESPN reporting is 'patently false'

Last week, ESPN reported that Washington Commanders owner Daniel Snyder had "dirt" on his fellow owners, coaches and executives in the NFL. He had accumulated this "dirt" via sources, and per ESPN, he even had a private investigative firm looking into people.

Snyder has long been seen as "public enemy No. 1" among NFL owners. Sure, the old name of his team didn't help matters, but his organization has also faced allegations of being a hostile workplace — particularly toward women. It was so bad, in fact, that even Congress decided to look into Snyder and his franchise. 

So yes, the owners as a whole probably have good reason to see Snyder boosted from his position of power in Washington. That would be even more so the case if the ESPN report about him collecting the goods on his fellow owners is true.

And to that point, Snyder says...nay...in a letter to the league owners.

In part, the letter reads:

“I would like to address a recent ESPN article that contains false and malicious statements about the Washington Commanders, our management team, and me and my family.

“There is one allegation in the ESPN article that I feel it is important to address immediately. The article cites unnamed sources who said: ‘They’ve been told that Snyder instructed his law firms to hire private investigators to look into other owners’ and Commissioner Goodell. That is patently false and intended to erode the trust and goodwill between owners that I take quite seriously. I have never instructed or authorized my lawyers to hire any private investigator on my behalf for any such purpose. And I never would.”

It will be interesting to see if Snyder's peers end up believing him, but perhaps the damage is already done. Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay already thinks there's merit to the idea of the NFL ownership fraternity booting Snyder, and he thinks there would be the votes to do it as well.

“I believe that there’s merit to remove him as owner of the [Commanders],” Irsay said to reporters, per Nicki Jhabvala of the Washington Post. “I think it’s something that we have to review. We have to look at all the evidence and be thorough in going forward. But I think it’s something that has to be given serious consideration.”

Stay tuned, because this saga is far from over. 

More must-reads:

TODAY'S BEST
Report: Cowboys quietly 'all in' on Dak Prescott decision
Mike Tyson-Jake Paul fight temporarily postponed
Diamondbacks ace heading to injured list with hamstring strain
Golden Knights, key winger have mutual interest but face financial crunch
Caitlin Clark frustrated by physical WNBA play: 'I feel like I'm getting hammered'
Pelicans to defer Lakers' first-rounder to 2025
Former top-10 WR pick speaks on retirement regret, comeback try
Pistons make major front-office firing
Orioles lose two starting pitchers to season-ending surgeries
Cavaliers to interview Knicks, Heat assistants for HC opening
Cowboys RB trying out new position during OTAs
Lions sign second-round cornerback
Why Timberwolves players skipped TNT interview after Game 4
Yankees' Aaron Judge, Juan Soto make MLB history with impressive offensive numbers
Guardians designate once-vaunted outfielder for assignment
Inside source shares telling comment about Juan Soto's feelings on Mets
Bills give Olympic gold medalist chance in NFL
New kickoff rule has Chiefs considering radical, outside-the-box strategy
One rookie quarterback is showing 'elite downfield accuracy' during OTAs
Luka Doncic discusses what T-Wolves fan said to fire him up in Game 5 win

Want more Commanders news?

Join the hundreds of thousands of fans who start their day with Yardbarker's Morning Bark, the best newsletter in sports.