The New York Giants find themselves at a crossroads as they approach the NFL Draft, stirring up considerable debate among football enthusiasts. On one side of the argument, there’s a faction advocating for the continued development of Daniel Jones. They propose bolstering the team’s offensive arsenal by acquiring another weapon, possibly selecting from the pool of promising wide receiver prospects available.
Conversely, there’s a camp advocating for a clean slate, advocating for the Giants to select a new quarterback with their No. 6 pick in the draft.
Former NFL player Damien Woody has been vocal in this debate.
Speaking on Get Up, Woody made a case for moving on from Jones, suggesting that acquiring a new quarterback for Brian Daboll to nurture would be the optimal strategy, even if it means the new recruit spends a season on the sidelines learning the ropes.
The Giants’ initial enthusiasm for Jones waned early in his career, evidenced by their decision not to exercise his fifth-year option. While he showed promise in Daboll’s inaugural season, earning a lucrative contract, Jones struggled to maintain his performance and experienced significant regression in the subsequent season.
Doubts persist among those who were initially skeptical of his abilities, exacerbated by concerns about his susceptibility to injuries. Despite these uncertainties, the Giants are contractually committed to Jones for at least another season before they can explore other options.
Given this predicament, Woody’s argument gains traction. Even if the Giants opt to draft a new quarterback, allowing the rookie to observe and learn from the sidelines for a season could prove beneficial.
In any case, the pressure is on Daniel Jones to deliver his best performance in 2024 if he intends to secure his position within the team.
With speculation swirling, his future with the Giants hinges on his ability to rise to the occasion.
More must-reads: