Indianapolis Colts quarterback Joe Flacco. Troy Taormina-USA TODAY Sports

Current Indianapolis Colts quarterback Joe Flacco shocked many fans and analysts this offseason when he did not re-sign with the Cleveland Browns after a successful 2023 campaign. Flacco was able to help Cleveland amount to an 11-6 record and brought the team to the postseason despite several key injuries throughout the regular season. The reasoning behind the veteran quarterback not coming back for another season has been unidentified, Flacco commented on why he believes the team ultimately decided to look in a different direction.

Joe Flacco reveals why he moved on

According to Flacco, he was surprised that he did not re-sign with the team and that he would have loved to come back for another year. However, the Browns organization believed that the quarterback’s style of play did not fit their scheme well, which led to them signing Jameis Winston instead.

There have been previous rumors that Flacco did not come back to Cleveland because of contract disputes, and the fact that he would likely become the backup option to Deshaun Watson next season, which would probably lead to controversy. Many see Flacco as the better option under center rather than Watson, so there would likely be drama as the season goes on.

After coming in for Watson in 2023, the veteran quarterback was able to amount to 1,616 passing yards and 13 touchdowns while helping Cleveland clinch a spot in the postseason. Flacco has been in the league since 2008, making him one of the oldest current players still in the NFL today.

Joe Flacco career

The veteran started his career with the Baltimore Ravens, where he won the Super Bowl and earned the Super Bowl MVP award in 2013. He spent most of his career in Baltimore until 2019, when he signed with the Denver Broncos for a season, then went to the New York Jets for three seasons as a backup option.

Even though he would have liked to remain in Cleveland in 2024, he seems determined to have the same success in Indianapolis in 2024 if his name is called. Do you think the Browns should have kept Flacco, or did they make the right decision to move on from an aging veteran?

More must-reads:

TODAY'S BEST
Rafael Nadal switches gears, gives major update on French Open status
Atlanta to be first race of NASCAR's In-Season Tournament
West Point alum made history in his MLB debut with Reds
Heat legend cautions Lakers against hiring JJ Redick
Welcome to the WNBA: Caitlin Clark sets infamous record in debut
Jalen Brunson leads Knicks to blowout win in Game 5 vs. Pacers
Nikola Jokic torches DPOY to lead Nuggets past Wolves in Game 5
Oilers use late heroics to tie Canucks at two games each
Watch: Astros pitcher ejected after foreign substance check
Kirk Cousins not angry with Falcons because winning is 'hard enough'
Bronny James has surprising comments on potentially teaming up with LeBron
Bills add two-time Super Bowl champ to new-look WR room
Brewers lose team-leading home run hitter to injured list
Sandy Alderson denies involvement in Mets, Billy Eppler IL controversy
Twins reliever shut down for six weeks with patellar tendon tear
Chris Finch throws shade at Nuggets star over Rudy Gobert’s fine
Cardinals head coach warns not to bet against Kyler Murray
Details emerge on Jason Kelce’s role at ESPN
Rangers defenseman wins Mark Messier Leadership Award
Ex-NFL head coach takes over as Arena Football League commish