NFL only stands to gain from upstart leagues like the AAF

One of the more accepted precepts of American life is that competition spurs innovation. It might be a stretch to say the Alliance of American Football is actual competition for the NFL — especially since their seasons don’t currently overlap — but the AAF just might end up making an impact on how the NFL conducts its business.

The AAF began play this past weekend and can already tout outdrawing the viewership of a prime-time NBA game as an achievement. That’s probably a testament to the country’s love affair with football more than anything, but given what a disaster Super Bowl LIII was and what a persistent PR nightmare the NFL seems to always exist in, it’s remarkable to see any pro football league have what many are describing as a positive debut.

Many hope that the AAF eventually becomes a developmental league for the NFL — kind of the football equivalent of the G League to the NBA. This seems to be the fate of every upstart league to some extent. It was the plan for the short-lived UFL that began 10 years ago but only lasted until 2012. The AAF has some prominent backing, so even if significantly cutting into the NFL’s dominance is unlikely, it seems like it may hold on a bit longer.

For the time being, though, most are concerned with how the AAF will affect the NFL. Being an incubator for talent is nice, and there are certainly plenty of examples players moving to the NFL and becoming stars after playing in other leagues for a while. But the more lasting impact may very well be the slight rule or procedure changes the AAF can inspire in the NFL.

For example, having a transparent review process was a huge hit among viewers — though thankfully this wasn’t a thing when the NFL had such a difficult time defining a catch, as it probably would have made people more and more angry about the shifting, incomprehensible standard that even the NFL barely understood.