Edmonton gifted a few goals and couldn’t slow down the line of Jack Eichel, Jonathon Marchessault, and Ivan Barbashev. That line crushed them.

They were on for nine goals for and two against. The only other Vegas forward who was on the ice for more shots for than against was Nicolas Roy at 30-29.

Edmonton only had two players, McDavid and Zach Hyman, who weren’t outscored 5×5 in the series. Vegas didn’t control the play more at 5×5, and didn’t outshoot the Oilers, but they were more consistent and reliable defensively. They also generated more rebound opportunities. Did Vegas gain any advantage by playing their fourth line a bit more at 5×5?

Carrier and Kolesar played two and three minutes more than Klim Kostin and Mattias Janmark, although Janmark’s stats are skewed because he got injured in game one and left early. McDavid logged 1:45 more/game than Eichel did at 5×5. It wasn’t a massive discrepancy in TOI. The Eichel line simply scored more in the series, but head-to-head he and McDavid’s line were even with two goals for and two against.

I don’t think TOI for the forwards was much of a factor in the series outcome. It was more about Edmonton’s inability to lock it down defensively when needed. The veterans outlined that very honestly in their end-of-season availabilities. None more accurate than this comment from Draisaitl: “I think sometimes, as a team, for us we find a way to lose games and more so beat ourselves than the team actually beating us,” he said. “We have to find a way to learn how to not beat ourselves.”

Playing consistent, sound defense can be tiring. You need to be diligent all the time defensively, and for the Oilers they will need to learn, and show it, during the regular season. I saw no issue with the Oilers TOI at 5×5 in the playoffs, but I do wonder if the team might benefit if McDavid and Draisaitl play fewer minutes 5×5 in the regular season.

REGULAR SEASON STATS…

I looked at the previous two regular seasons. McDavid and Draisaitl led the NHL in 5×5 TOI with 2,626 and 2,554 minutes respectively. Both were very healthy as McDavid missed a total of two games and Draisaitl sat out four. I ranked them by TOI/game to eliminate games played and set the minimum TOI at 1,100 minutes, and then I looked at pts/60 and Draisaitl was 32nd.

I have them listed by TOI/GP. Nathan MacKinnon is first, and the column “Rank” shows where they sit in regard to points/60.

McDavid is 14th and Draisaitl is 32nd. McDavid is third in total points with 117 and Draisaitl is eighth with 105. Would they benefit from a bit less time/game at 5×5?

In 2022 McDavid averaged 16:35/game and produced 22-36-58 in 82 games.
This past year he skated 15:57 per game and scored 32-27-59 in 80 games.

However, Draisaitl had a slight dip in TOI and in points.
In 2022 he skated 16:03/game and scored 26-28-54 in 80 games.
In 2023 he averaged 15:52/game and scored 17-34-51 in 80 games.

The biggest difference was he had 148 shots in 2022 and 119 in 2023.

Their production and their TOI/game was very close each season. It would be a reach to suggest Draisaitl playing 11 fewer seconds per game was why he scored nine fewer goals.

When we look at their total TOI compared to other teams’ top players, playing those extra minutes isn’t leading to a significant increase in point production. It also isn’t leading to significantly more goals against/60 as well. If you look at the same 32 players, McDavid ranks 12th in GA/60 and Draisaitl is 21st.

McDavid has the 10th-highest on-ice Sv%, while Draisaitl is 20th.

When you look at points, goals for, goals against, Sv%, and a few other stats, I don’t think you can accurately state that fewer minutes at 5×5 for Draisaitl or McDavid will lead to improved success.

However, in part two tomorrow we will look at one factor which, while not directly connected to 5×5, does impact the overall numbers, and that is where Jay Woodcroft might consider how it impacts their minutes at 5×5.