Sergei Belski-USA TODAY Sports

Calgary Flames goaltender Jacob Markstrom was clearly upset over the handling of trade rumors by Flames’ management on Friday. Adding a layer of uncertainty to his future with the team, Markstrom blasted those “at the top” who could have handled his deadline situation differently. Despite recent reports suggesting the Flames plan to retain him, questions now surround Markstrom’s future and an offseason change might be coming. That is, if he’s not traded in the next few days.

In a recent interview, Markstrom took a clear jab at the organization’s higher-ups, expressing his dissatisfaction with how things were handled. As Eric Francis reports, speculation suggests the Flames may have asked him to waive his no-move clause, only to backtrack on a potential deal when they refused to retain salary. The details remain unclear, with conflicting reports on whether Markstrom was officially asked to waive the clause or merely consider a trade scenario.

Flames general manager Craig Conroy has not commented on the situation, leaving the question of Markstrom’s official trade situation unanswered. The uncertainty surrounding the goalie’s status has raised concerns about the relationship between player and management, with potential repercussions on a trade that may be on the horizon.

Have the Flames Burned Their Bridge with Markstrom?

The timing of any trade becomes a critical factor, as Markstrom could still be traded before March 8. At the same time, his value could be maximized by waiting until the summer. The New Jersey Devils are said to be pushing hard to get the Flames to deal him, but an off-season trade would open up a broader market with more bidders. Waiting means a higher cap ceiling across the league and other teams have the funds to take on bigger tickets.

All that said, Markstrom’s comments have fans wondering if this relationship is doomed long-term. His public blasting of management is not the move of a player who seems comfortable and wants to be part of things moving forward.

The Flames face the challenge of either trying to settle things or moving a player who feels slighted and would prefer a change of scenery.

More must-reads:

TODAY'S BEST
Timberwolves chew up Nuggets to force Game 7
Watch: Chris Kreider's natural third-period hat trick shatters Hurricanes' comeback hopes
Dodgers starter undergoes season-ending UCL surgery
Knicks star ruled out for potential closeout game
Veteran NFL safety will either play for this team or retire in 2024
Former Red Wings head coach linked to open NHL job
How Patriots' Drake Maye has already impressed Jacoby Brissett
LeBron James, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Stephen Curry among Forbes' highest-paid athletes for 2024
Steve Cohen addresses if Mets could again be trade-deadline sellers
Tiger Woods ruins strong first round with sloppy finish at PGA Championship
Xander Schauffele makes history in first round of PGA Championship
NFL responds to speculation about Chiefs schedule and Taylor Swift
Despite hopes for change, NASCAR championship weekend will return to Phoenix in 2025
Chiefs will achieve something not done since 1927 with 2024 schedule
Caitlin Clark's debut was most-watched WNBA game in more than 20 years
Yankees' Aaron Judge comments on resurgence after bad slump
Odell Beckham Jr. reveals why he was 'hesitant' to join Dolphins
Lakers reportedly interested in adding three-time All-Star via trade
Luka Doncic fed off negative reactions in Game 5 win over Thunder
Celtics finally put away undermanned Cavaliers, advance to conference finals

Want more Flames news?

Join the hundreds of thousands of fans who start their day with Yardbarker's Morning Bark, the best newsletter in sports.