Did Andy Staples Snub Clemson Quarterback Cade Klubnik?

Sellers, while dynamic and promising, still trails Klubnik in both career production and consistency. He did defeat Clemson in the season finale and flashed dual-threat upside, but his total yardage and touchdowns still fell short of Klubnik’s passing numbers alone.

Lagway’s case is even more speculative. The former five-star recruit started just six games for Florida in 2024 and posted modest numbers—1,915 passing yards, 12 touchdowns, and nine interceptions.

Meanwhile, Klubnik has steadily climbed the ranks. After a rocky start early in his career, he delivered when it mattered in 2024, leading Clemson to an ACC title and a playoff berth while commanding Garrett Riley’s offense with poise and precision.

So why the snub?

Staples defended the ranking in a recent segment with fellow analyst Ali Wasserman, noting that his list wasn’t solely based on past performance, but potential.

“Sellers and Lagway have that raw, game-changing upside,” Staples said. “They’re future Heisman-type talents. Klubnik’s ceiling may be a little lower—but he’s certainly polished and dependable.”

Still, that explanation hasn’t quieted the storm among Clemson fans, many of whom believe Klubnik has more than earned top billing entering his final year.

And in many ways, that’s the beauty of preseason lists—they don’t settle debates, they fuel them.

With the spotlight firmly on him, Klubnik now has one more reason to approach 2025 with a chip on his shoulder. If he builds on his 2024 form, where he completed over 63% of his passes and led Clemson back to national relevance, he won’t just rewrite preseason rankings—he could reinsert himself into the Heisman conversation.

For now, though, the message is clear: the debate is on. And Cade Klubnik is ready to let his game do the talking.