Yardbarker
x
Ohio State Legend Rips Apart NCAA After Michigan’s $20 Million Punishment
© Lucas Peltier-Imagn Images

Ohio State Buckeyes legend Cardale Jones sharply criticized the NCAA following Michigan’s estimated $20 million sanction for a sign-stealing scandal. His reaction went beyond rivalry, highlighting what he called the NCAA’s inability to apply discipline consistently.

“This is not about Michigan. We all know what you guys did is over, is done,” Jones said in a recent appearance during his "The Script" podcast alongside co-hosts Beanie Wells and Dave Holmes. “I think it’s more so about the NCAA and their inability to consistently hand out punishment or discipline.”

The NCAA’s decision landed just weeks before the 2025 season, a jarring moment for a program fresh off a national title in 2023. For Jones, the issue was less about vacating championships and more about whether sanctions across college football are applied fairly.

“I’m not on a bandwagon of taking their national championships away. ... At the end of the day, they still won those games in the playoffs,” said Jones, a quarterback who led the Buckeyes to their 2014 national championship. “You can’t take that away from them.”

Michigan Hit with Record Financial Penalty, Coaching Sanctions

The NCAA issued over $20 million in fines against Michigan, including lost postseason revenue, budget cuts, scholarship reductions and a four-year probation.

Coach Sherrone Moore will miss three games, including two already assessed by Michigan, while former coach Jim Harbaugh received a 10-year show-cause penalty, and staffer Connor Stalions was hit with eight years.

Despite the scope, Jones argued that the punishment failed to reflect the gravity of the violations. “What Michigan did was an ultimate slap in the face and a test of the integrity of the game overall,” he said.

The investigation revealed a system dubbed the “KGB” that organized widespread sign-stealing operations. According to NCAA documents, staffers destroyed materials and misled investigators, adding layers to the case that deepened its severity.

Inconsistency of NCAA Punishment Under Scrutiny

Jones compared Michigan’s penalties with those handed to Ohio State and USC in the past. “You look at what Ohio State did back in the day, you look at what USC got knocked for, you look at what other universities got knocked for,” he said. “Off-the-field issues, guys were taking advantage of their NIL before NIL was a thing to provide for their family. That’s the most frustrating part.”

To him, the difference is clear. Ohio State and USC faced major consequences for matters tied to benefits and compliance, but Michigan altered the outcomes of “big games,” as Jones put it. That distinction, he argued, should have carried more weight in the final ruling.

Critics across college football agree that the NCAA missed an opportunity to send a stronger message. While Michigan faces financial strain, its titles remain intact, and its future postseason opportunities are still open.

The appeal process will unfold in the coming weeks, and scrutiny of the NCAA’s authority will only intensify. Jones’s voice adds fuel to a debate that could reshape how punishment is understood in a sport dominated by money, media and rivalry.

This article first appeared on Athlon Sports and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!