
Felipe Massa lost out on the 2008 driver’s title under very controversial circumstances. The infamous Singapore GP Crashgate scandal caused Massa to lose the title by a mere one-point gap to Hamilton. As such, the Brazilian recently set out to pursue a legal case against the governing body, demanding that the 2008 title winner be overthrown.
Now, a court hearing has ruled against the favor of the 44-year-old and said some stern things. Felipe Massa had recently provided a long-awaited update on his legal lawsuit against the authorities involved in the 2008 scandal. T
he Brazilian had reassured that he would pursue the case until the very end, until he was compensated for all the financial losses since then. Now, in a recent court hearing, Massa and Co. received some shocking news from the defendant’s lawyer, who is accusing the former of some serious allegations.
The defendant’s lawyers insisted that Felipe Massa’s claims in the matter were misguided attempts to reopen the championship results of the 2008 driver’s championship. Lewis Hamilton would be stripped of his title win, and Massa would be handed the title, which wasn’t possible. Even the then F1 CEO Bernie Ecclestone had talked about the case and how changing the result wasn’t a possibility anymore.
Further, the defendant’s lawyer claimed that the court wasn’t a sports debate club that required such matters to be taken to the court. Felipe Massa demanded that the court delve into a counterfactual exercise on the refreeing of the Crashgate scandal at the Singapore GP.
The entire matter happened over 17 years ago, and hence it wasn’t required to be reopened now just to overturn the results of the championship battle back then.
Mr Massa argues that, but for the FIA’s handling of the crash, he would have won the Drivers’ Championship. These declarations treat the court as a sports ‘debating club’, asking it to embark upon a counterfactual exercise concerning the ‘refereeing’ of a sporting event which took place nearly 17 years ago.
The defendant’s lawyer, Mr David Quest KC said, via Sky Sports.
Throughout the 2008 season, both Lewis Hamilton and Felipe Massa were performing great. Regardless of the Crashgate scandal, both drivers deserved the title win, and the best driver between them won the race.
Following the entire legal battle, the FOM’s KC, Annelise Day, made some bold claims on the championship controversies back in 2008. She alleged that Massa’s title loss wasn’t because of the governing body’s decision at the Singapore GP.
Annelise Day insisted that the deployment of the safety car at the Singapore GP wasn’t the reason behind Felipe Massa losing the race that day. Rather, it was a series of subsequent racing errors that he and his team committed for the remaining 47 laps of the race that cost him the race win.
Day pointed out that Lewis Hamilton simply outperformed Massa across the 2008 season and hence ultimately deserved the title win.
In truth, it was not the deployment of the safety car which changed the course of history for Mr Massa, but rather a series of subsequent racing errors by him and his team during the remaining 47 laps of the race. The simple fact is that over the course of both the Singapore Grand Prix and across the 2008 season, Mr Hamilton outperformed Mr Massa and everyone else.
Annelise Day said, as reported by Sky Sports.
The legal battle will continue for quite some time with seemingly no solution. The case is definitely tricky and would need an extended study into it. However, Felipe Massa is confident in his claims and would not back down without a fight. Now, time will tell about how the legal case pans out in favor of which party, but for now, things aren’t looking so great on Massa’s side.
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!