
If you’re unsure who actually won the Felipe Massa vs. Formula 1/FIA legal battle, you’re not alone. The ruling delivered by the London High Court has left fans and pundits split, and both sides claiming victory for different reasons.
Massa had filed an $80 million lawsuit against Formula 1, the FIA, and former F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone, alleging that the mishandled fallout of the 2008 Singapore “Crashgate” robbed him of the World Championship.
Notably, Lewis Hamilton won the 2008 Drivers' World Championship (his first) by just one point ahead of Massa, another reason this lawsuit has drawn major media attention.
While Hamilton has already made his feelings clear on Massa's $80 million lawsuit, the court's recent ruling has sparked renewed interest among fans and pundits.
The court dismissed every part of Massa’s claim that argued the FIA broke its own rules back in 2008. The judge ruled:
Hence, FIA is calling the ruling a victory, as the court struck down every direct allegation against them. However, the case isn’t over.
The judge allowed one major claim to move forward: a conspiracy allegation against all three defendants: Ecclestone, the FIA, and the late Max Mosley.
However, it does not mean the judge believes a conspiracy happened. It simply means Massa is now allowed to attempt to prove at trial that:
Consequently, Massa is calling the ruling a win; the part of the lawsuit he now cares about most is still alive.
The judge also warned that Massa has major hurdles ahead. For him to succeed, he must prove:
In short, the FIA won the first round because the court dismissed all direct claims against them. However, Massa also won a small but meaningful victory, because the conspiracy claim, the only one that could still impact the record books, will proceed to a full trial.
In summary, this case is far from over. No one has fully “won” yet.
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!