Coco Gauff survived a testing opening match at the 2025 US Open, beating Ajla Tomljanović 6-4, 6-7, 7-5 in a gruelling first-round encounter. After the win, she spoke at length about her new serve motion, the mental challenge of implementing changes under Grand Slam pressure, and the honour of being recognised by the International Tennis Writers Association.
Before questions began at the US Open, Gauff was named ITWA Ambassador of the Year, an award voted on by more than 100 tennis writers worldwide. It honours a player who best represents the sport, whether after wins or losses, and is consistently generous with time and insight.
“Thank you. Oh wow, that’s nice,” Gauff said when presented with the honour. “I was worried a bit. At least I would have got this then, so that’s cool. I won the match and I’m Ambassador of the Year – very cool. Thank you.
“I always try to be honest and positive and give you guys my thoughts. I’ve lost some tough ones and still came in and gave you a good one, so I don’t think I’ll change.”
On court, Gauff admitted the match had been mentally exhausting, and she expanded on that afterwards. “When I said that, I was referring more to the practice week, not the match,” she clarified. “The match was what it was – I’m so used to these long battles. But the practice week was tough because I was spending a lot of time on court, literally serving until my shoulder was hurting.
“It’s tough, but I feel like it’s in the right direction. The key for me is trying not to go back to old habits in those tighter moments, and I think I did that today, especially in the third set. I knew when I made this change that maybe I wouldn’t serve my best right away, but I didn’t want to waste any more time.
“If I could have worked with Gavin (MacMillan) earlier, I would have, but he was on another player’s team. Then he became available, and I knew I had to make a quick decision. Hopefully by this time next year, I’ll be serving much better.”
The third set, she said, was a vivid example of battling between old patterns and the new technique. “Honestly, that third set was the definition of that,” Gauff explained. “The game where I served at 5–4 was definitely an old habit. The next game was a lot better. The more confident I get, the more I can go for it.
“I don’t think I served so fast today. I’d like to get up there in numbers, but I need more reps. If it was another player, maybe it would’ve been more straightforward, but we had so many long rallies and she didn’t miss many returns. It’s tough battling that internal fight, especially since this is the first tournament I’ve tried this. I wish I could have started in Montreal, but it is what it is.”
At 6–5 in the final set, she trusted her new coach Gavin MacMillan’s work. “It’s all mechanics,” she said. “At 6–5 I told myself, ‘OK, I have to trust what we did on court,’ and that’s what I did. It’s a new motion. Sometimes I do it well, sometimes not so well. But when I do it, the result is always good. The challenge is reminding myself how to do it when so much is going through my head – not just the serve, but where to serve, how to play the point, what she’s going to do. I just need to remember how I felt today and use that in the next match.”
Rebuilding her serve, Gauff said, feels like starting from scratch. “It’s definitely like learning a new language,” she admitted. “Even looking at tagged posts of me – Gavin and I send things back and forth like, ‘this picture looks good, this one doesn’t.’ I try not to get obsessed, but it is a bit, because this is the part of my game I need to improve to get the results I want.
“I’m not making excuses. It’s not mental. It’s a biomechanical thing I had wrong, and I’m trying my best to get it right.”
That has also meant intentionally slowing her serve down. "That’s a personal choice,” she said. “If I want to, I can. A couple of times today I hit around 114, 115. But it’s not something Gavin told me to do. It’s about staying in the new motion. If I need the speed, I can get it.”
Pressed for the technical details, Gauff declined to give specifics but acknowledged the process takes time. “I don’t want to give away everything we’re working on. But it’s been six days, and in a high-stress situation like the US Open, not a 500. I don’t know how long it’ll take – we’ll see.”
Gauff was full of respect for Tomljanović, who pushed her to the brink. “I was very aware,” she said when asked about comparisons to Tomljanović’s match against Serena Williams. “Before the match, I told myself she’d probably play at that level again – steady off the ground, not missing, taking her chances. I watched that match with Serena, so I expected that today.
“I think she does better under the big lights. I played her at the Olympics and it was the complete opposite. That’s tough when opponents can step it up in these moments. But honestly, I needed a match like this. First rounds are always more stressful than finals in my experience.”
Despite limited time with MacMillan, Gauff already feels encouraged by the partnership. “He’s a very nice guy,” she said. “I trust him because a lot of what he tells me has facts and science behind it, instead of just ‘do this.’ When I believe in a coach and a plan, I can play good tennis. It’s only been a week, but hopefully if I’m here in the second week we’ll have a different plan. Regardless of how this tournament goes, I’m looking forward to building with him before Asia.”
And yes, the tagged social media posts have been part of her process too. “That was more me, not Gavin,” Gauff laughed. “He has all the videos. But sometimes when he pulls out the camera, I feel like I do it better, so I look at other angles. I don’t know who the user was, but I did see something. I appreciate the fans for tagging me.”
Other | ||
---|---|---|
Return | ||
Service | ||
Tomljanovic | VS | Gauff |
2 | Aces | 4 |
7 | Double Faults | 10 |
66% (84/127) | 1st Service Percentage | 61% (62/101) |
58% (49/84) | 1st Service Points Won | 66% (41/62) |
42% (18/43) | 2nd Service Points Won | 44% (17/39) |
47% (7/15) | Break Points Saved | 40% (4/10) |
53% (9/17) | Service Games | 65% (11/17) |
34% (21/62) | 1st Return Points Won | 42% (35/84) |
56% (22/39) | 2nd Return Points Won | 58% (25/43) |
3h 00m | Match Duration | 3h 00m |
More must-reads:
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!