Steph Curry Says 2017 Warriors Would Beat The 1996 Bulls In 7-Game Finals: "Dubs In Six."

Funnily enough, Scottie Pippen recently chimed in on the debate as well, stating that his Bulls would easily beat the Warriors... in six games.

I'll stick our roster against the Warriors any day -- especially our second three-peat teams.

Let's go through the matchups:

Dennis Rodman or Draymond Green at power forward? Dennis. Luc Longley or Andrew Bogut/JaVale McGee at center? Luc. Michael Jordan or Klay Thompson at shooting guard? Michael. Me or Kevin Durant at small forward? You could go either way. The only matchup in Golden State's favor would be Steph Curry over Ron Harper at point guard.

One more thing: the Warriors had nobody off the bench as skilled as Toni Kukoc.

Prediction: Bulls in six. (the series wouldn't even go seven. After all, we never extended to a Game 7 in the Finals).

Needless to say, nobody is surprised that Pippen and Curry disagree on this topic. But who would actually win?

There is no doubt that the Bulls had considerably more strength and size than Golden State. Guys like Pippen, Rodman, and (of course) Jordan played with much more power than the 2017 Warriors ever did.

On the flip side, Golden State had shooting that Chicago just couldn't match. The combination of Steph, Durant, and Klay Thompson would ensure that the Dubs dominate the perimeter.

Even with everything we know, picking a conclusive winner is just an impossible task. There will always be a case to be made for one team over the other.

Nevertheless, it's fun to think about, and even better to watch some of the players who were on those teams make the case for their squad.