The NBA is full of thrilling moments, legendary players, and unforgettable plays. But what if certain events in NBA history had unfolded differently? There are countless “what-ifs” that could have drastically changed the trajectory of the league. These events, though never actualized, provide intriguing scenarios for fans and analysts alike. In this article, we’ll explore the biggest what-ifs in NBA history that could have rewritten basketball history.
The 1984 NBA Draft is often regarded as one of the best in history, with numerous future Hall of Famers including Hakeem Olajuwon, Charles Barkley, and John Stockton. However, the biggest “what-if” in that draft revolves around the Chicago Bulls’ selection of Michael Jordan. Many forget that the Portland Trail Blazers had the second overall pick, and they chose Sam Bowie instead of Jordan.
If the Bulls hadn’t selected Jordan with the third pick, it’s likely the NBA would have been a very different place. Jordan’s arrival in Chicago not only turned the Bulls into a dynasty, but his competitive fire and ability also elevated the entire league. Without Jordan, the Bulls might not have won six championships, and the NBA’s global expansion may have taken a different path.
In 2007, the Boston Celtics pulled off one of the biggest trades in NBA history, acquiring Ray Allen and Kevin Garnett to form a “Big Three” with Paul Pierce. Together, they led the Celtics to an NBA championship in 2008, bringing the franchise its first title in 22 years.
However, an even bigger “what-if” lies in a trade that nearly happened just before the Celtics finalized the deal. Boston was reportedly close to trading for both Garnett and Kobe Bryant, which would have created an even more formidable duo. If that trade had gone through, the NBA could have seen a Boston-Los Angeles rivalry at its peak with Bryant and Garnett leading the Celtics. The ripple effects on the Lakers’ dynasty and the NBA’s balance of power would have been monumental.
In 2003, LeBron James was the most anticipated prospect in NBA history, and every team in the league had their eye on the young star. As it turned out, the Cleveland Cavaliers had the luck of the lottery, securing the first overall pick and selecting LeBron. But one of the biggest what-ifs in the NBA revolves around the Detroit Pistons’ near-trade for James.
Before the draft, the Pistons were reportedly trying to trade for the first pick. If they had succeeded, LeBron could have teamed up with a well-established team that had just won the 2004 NBA championship. A combination of LeBron and the Pistons’ elite defense could have changed the course of NBA history. Would LeBron have won championships earlier? Would the Cavaliers have struggled to find success without him? It’s a fascinating thought experiment.
The 2011-2012 NBA season saw the Dallas Mavericks come off an incredible championship win, and the team was looking to bolster its roster further. Reports surfaced that the Mavericks were on the verge of trading for point guard Chris Paul, which would have given the Mavericks an elite playmaker to pair with Dirk Nowitzki.
However, the trade never materialized, and Paul was eventually traded to the Los Angeles Clippers. Had the Mavericks secured Paul, their title window may have extended beyond 2011, especially considering how close they were to competing in the years that followed. This trade could have pushed Dallas into a dominant position in the Western Conference.
The 1996 Chicago Bulls were coming off their first three-peat, and they had a chance to form an even more dominant squad. Rumors circulated during that offseason about the Bulls trading Scottie Pippen. Pippen, of course, was crucial to Chicago’s success during their six championships, and any trade involving him could have had disastrous consequences for the team.
Had the Bulls gone through with trading Pippen, it’s possible that the team would not have won another championship. With Pippen’s defense, playmaking, and leadership, his presence on the team was essential. The biggest what-ifs in the NBA often revolve around star player dynamics, and this was one of those moments where a single decision could have changed everything for the Bulls.
The Golden State Warriors’ 3-1 lead over the Cleveland Cavaliers in the 2016 NBA Finals is one of the most infamous moments in NBA history. The Warriors were on the verge of winning their second championship in three years, but they faltered in the final games of the series, leading to one of the most shocking upsets in basketball history.
Had the Warriors closed out that series, they would have secured the title, and LeBron James’ legacy would have looked very different. Would the Warriors have continued to dominate the NBA, or would this loss have motivated Cleveland to make changes and improve its roster? Bleacher Report explores how such pivotal moments impact the entire league, and the Warriors’ collapse remains a defining moment in NBA lore.
In 2011, the Lakers were one of the most successful teams in the NBA, and they were positioned to win more championships in the years to come. However, in December 2011, a trade that would have brought Chris Paul to Los Angeles was blocked by the NBA’s owners, citing concerns over competitive balance.
Had the trade gone through, the Lakers would have added Paul to a team with Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, and Andrew Bynum. A Paul-Bryant backcourt could have potentially made the Lakers the most formidable team of the early 2010s. Instead, Paul was traded to the Clippers, and the Lakers missed out on a chance to further cement their dominance.
The 1992 “Dream Team” is widely regarded as the greatest collection of basketball talent ever assembled, with legends like Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, and Charles Barkley. Their dominant performance in the Barcelona Olympics was a defining moment for the sport, and it introduced the NBA to the world stage.
However, an alternative scenario where the Dream Team didn’t participate in the Olympics could have dramatically affected the global growth of the NBA. The league may not have experienced the same level of international attention, and future NBA players could have lacked the same global appeal. This would have changed the way the NBA expanded its brand across the world.
In 1996, Shaquille O’Neal was a free agent after leading the Orlando Magic to the NBA Finals. Despite the Magic offering him a lucrative contract, O’Neal chose to leave for the Los Angeles Lakers, where he went on to dominate the league and form a championship-winning duo with Kobe Bryant.
Had O’Neal stayed with the Magic, it’s possible Orlando could have been a contender in the Eastern Conference for years to come. O’Neal’s presence, paired with emerging talent, could have transformed the Magic’s future, perhaps leading them to multiple championships instead of the Lakers dominating the 2000s.
Kevin Durant’s decision to leave the Oklahoma City Thunder and join the Golden State Warriors in 2016 shocked the basketball world. His move resulted in back-to-back championships for the Warriors, but it also left many wondering how the Thunder would have fared if Durant had stayed.
With Russell Westbrook and a talented roster around them, the Thunder could have remained a championship contender for several more years. Durant’s departure altered the course of NBA history, shifting the balance of power in the Western Conference and changing the competitive landscape of the NBA.
The NBA has been shaped by key moments that could have easily gone in a different direction. The above events are just a few of the many that could have fundamentally altered the league’s history. From trades that never happened to the rise and fall of dynasties, these “what-ifs” remind us that basketball history is full of moments that, though never realized, still captivate fans and spark debate. Each missed opportunity or failed transaction tells the story of how one decision can reshape an entire era in sports.
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!