Yardbarker
x
Giants Accused of Tanking After Controversial Quarterback Decision
USA TODAY Sports

The Giants did as they were expected in the wake of the team's bye in Week 11, announcing that quarterback Daniel Jones will be moving to the bench. Jones has gone 2-8 as a starter this season and is 24-44-1 in his career with the Giants. The team's loss to lowly Carolina in Week 9, which saw Jones throw two interceptions,  was the final straw.

The decision to make the move was helped, no doubt, by the injury guarantee in Jones' contract, which essentially says that the Giants will be on the hook for $23 million next year if Jones' 2024 season is cut short by injury. If Jones gets through the 2024 season healthy, the Giants can cut him and be free of the remaining two years and $100 million on his contract.

But the Giants had another option behind Jones, a starting-caliber quarterback who signed for $5 million to be the QB2 to start the year. That was Drew Lock, who has started 23 games in his career, and was presumed to be the QB-in-waiting once New York benched Jones. 

Instead, the Giants bumped Jones back to the QB3 role, left Lock as the QB2 and brought back old friend Tommy DeVito to be the starter. Why? Well, as retired longtime NFL quarterback Chase Daniel noted on Twitter/X, it's a good time for the Giants to tank.

"No Drew Lock?? Why in the hell did you sign him to a $5 Million deal? Giants really trying to lose," Daniel wrote on Monday.

In fairness to DeVito, he did go 3-3 as the Giants' starter in last year's mess of a season. Still, Lock is the better NFL quarterback and if the Giants did want to win out as much as possible, he'd be under center. 

The Giants are 2-8, part of a mix of five teams with just two wins, who will be competing for the top pick in the draft down the stretch of the season. If they can stay in the Top 3 or so, it is likely they would have a shot at picking the top quarterback in the draft, likely Colorado star Shedeur Sanders. 

Or, the Giants could be a candidate to sign a free agent, such as the Vikings' Sam Darnold, next March. 

There are other reasons to pick DeVito over Lock, and like the notion of tanking, those reasons are also a bit unseemly. As Spotrac contract expert Mike Ginnitti pointed out on Twitter/X, Lock signed a contract loaded with playing time incentives this offseason. 

If the Giants were to make him the starter, Ginnitti points out, they'd be on the hook for those incentives. 

In all, there are not that many incentives there that are relaistically in reach for Lock if he were to take over as the starter now, but it is not difficult to imagine him hitting around $1 million worth of new money if he were to play. 

If you're keeping score at home, then, the net result of the Giants' quarterback decision is to lose intentionally, and be as cheap as possible while doing so.

This article first appeared on Athlon Sports and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!