
Moving on from running back Aaron Jones wasn’t a very popular move among many Packers fans. However, the decision by Packers GM Brian Gutekunst to sign Josh Jacobs as a replacement for Jones was the correct one.
With a cap hit north of $14 million in 2026, could Jacobs potentially be a cap casualty? Do the Packers think he can get back to 2024 Josh Jacobs?
Emanuel Wilson ran with power and burst, too. Is he Josh Jacobs? No. But it hasn’t appeared that the gap between the two is great enough to warrant the large cap hit for Jacobs. The Packers could save money at the position and improve the squad elsewhere.
Jacobs is 28 years old, which isn’t old, but is in the range for questioning how much tread is left on the tires. The veteran running back has endured considerable wear and tear due to the workload throughout his career. In seven seasons, Jacobs has toted the ball 1,840 times.
It’s often better to move on from a player a year early than a year late.
The Packers clearly valued and desired a workhorse in the backfield when they brought in Jacobs. It was clear Jones wasn’t the guy to handle 20 carries every week like Jacobs.
Jacobs was phenomenal in 2024. The bulldozing running back rushed for 1,329 yards and 15 touchdowns on over 300 carries. He was efficient, too, averaging 4.4 yards per carry and adding 342 receiving yards on 36 catches.
Jones was good in 2024, too, rushing for 1,138 yards for the Minnesota Vikings. In 2025, Jones was hurt and totaled just 548 rushing yards.
Love Aaron Jones forever but the Packers are getting Josh Jacobs (the 2022 NFL rushing champ who is only 26) at one-third the salary cap cost of Jones in 2024.
— Zach Kruse (@zachkruse2) March 12, 2024
Similarly, Jacobs battled injuries and didn’t run with the same burst this season. He failed to reach 1,000 yards and missed a couple of bounce-back games due to injury. When said and done, he had 400 fewer rushing yards in 2025, totaling just 929, but did score 13 touchdowns.
Josh Jacobs’ contract doesn’t have any remaining guarantees outside of his initial signing bonus. The Packers have the flexibility to release him, as after June 1, cutting Jacobs would save Green Bay more than $11 million.
Packers were 9th in rushing success rate, but 21st in EPA/rush last year.
That's down from 9th in EPA/rush in 2024.
Packers have been very good with Josh Jacobs getting 4-6 yards. They need more explosive runs.
— Peter Bukowski (@Peter_Bukowski) February 9, 2026
Wilson flashed greatness at times for the Packers in 2025, but it’s unclear whether he’s viewed as a starting back in the NFL. He ran for 107 yards in a Nov. 23 win over the Vikings and also was impressive in an overtime loss to the Bears on Dec. 20 — he ran for 82 yards on just 14 carries in a game where Jacobs played but was on a snap count.
Chris Brooks did provide some valuable touches as a third-down back, but the depth chart isn’t deep with MarShawn Lloyd not able to get on an NFL field in meaningful football games. Lloyd has had a terrible time with injuries.
What makes Jacobs a possible cap casualty in part is just how the league views the running back position. There are only seven running backs who carry an eight-figure annual cap hit. Jacobs’ cap hit of $14.5 million in 2026 is slated to be top-5 in the league among running backs. Alvin Kamara ($18.6 million), Jonathan Taylor ($15.5 million), and, interestingly enough, Aaron Jones ($14.8 million) will count more against the cap.
One interesting move would be similar to what brought Jacobs to Green Bay. Could the Packers sign a free agent? A potential Travis Etienne or Javonte Williams to, say, an $8 million AAV? According to Spotrac, the Packers could have both for about half of Jacobs’ salary. While unlikely, the Packers could opt to maybe save some money at running back and upgrade the roster at cornerback, defensive line or linebacker with the savings.
Unless there is a plan for something similar to what brought Jacobs to Green Bay, the more likely outcome for Jacobs would be a contract restructure.
Due to the roster construction and depth chart at running back, Josh Jacobs won’t be going anywhere. The Packers will likely ride Jacobs at least one more year and could approach him about reworking his deal to be a bit more cap-friendly.
The more likely Packers cuts are OL Elgton Jenkins and defensive end Rashan Gary. While Jacobs is a significant cap hit, he has lived up to the money overall in his first two seasons in Green Bay. Also, Green Bay has no certainties on the market yet to justify moving on from Jacobs. While the Packers did do it with Jacobs, it isn’t common for the Pack to sign a running back as a free agent.
GM Brian Gutekunst and the Packers will likely select a running back in the 2026 Draft and potentially look to move on from Jacobs after next season.
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!