Over the last four offseasons, the Minnesota Vikings have done a fantastic job fixing the roster. General manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah needed the first three offseasons to fix the salary cap problem the Vikings had, and he did a masterful job of it.
One of the things that Adofo-Mensah maximized was his use of void years. Utilizing those has been a great way to continue adding talent while staying within the constraints of the rigid salary cap. It's how the Vikings compiled a regular season record of 34-17, despite having over $72 millino in dead salary cap in the 14 win 2024 season.
The use of void years isn't a new practice, but it's one that seems to have the owners looking to eliminate. Commissioner Roger Goodell heavily alluded to that when he spoke at the owners meetings last week.
“There are no formal plans on any discussions,” Goodell told reporters. “We obviously continue to be in close communication with the union on a variety of matters, but no start of negotiations have been set or are under consideration really at this point. We did spend time today talking, at length, about areas of our Collective Bargaining Agreement that we want to focus on. The two areas that we spent time on were really the cap system itself, the integrity of that system, how’s it working, where do we need to address that in the context of collective bargaining, when that does happen. That was a very lengthy discussion."
While Goodell didn't directly say that they will be looking to get rid of void years, it does seem that it was the focus of the discussion. Over The Cap's Jason Fitzgerald believes that to be the case.
Had a few questions about Goodell's comments on the cap...my gut feeling is those are about the current level of manipulation that exists with void years.
— Jason_OTC (@Jason_OTC) May 25, 2025
The nfl has always been a reactive league when it comes to rules. Changes often occur when too many teams skirt the rules
Why would the NFL try to eliminate the practice of void years? It's relatively simple: some teams can't afford to do it. The reason? Escrow.
When you sign a player to a contract, the entirety of the guarantees in each player's contract needs to go into escrow to ensure that the players get paid. Now, this is a policy that was implemented decades ago because players weren't being paid in proper time, as an escrow account ensures that their pay will be distributed in a timely manner.
The reality is that some teams can afford to front a ton of money and spread it out over multiple years with the salary cap because they have the cash on hand to make it happen. Other organizations aren't flush with that much cash, and have to structure their contracts much differently.
You can argue that it creates a competitive imbalance because some can do it while other's can't. However, the ability to do something doesn't mean they don't have it at their disposal if they so choose.
There are other elements at play with Goodell's comments, including future CBA negotiations, but this could be a major impact on the Vikings, both short and long-term.
If void years do go away, we can blame the Philadelphia Eagles for willing a Super Bowl on the back of them.
More must-reads:
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!