On Facebook
On Flipboard
On Twitter
The 'Top 10 rushers in Cleveland Browns history' quiz
Can you name the top 10 rushers in Cleveland Browns history? Quiz clue: Yards / Years active with team. Good luck!
0/10
3:00
More must-reads:
- Browns' Shedeur Sanders addresses missing practice with arm soreness
- Broncos' Sean Payton adds to Bo Nix hype with bold prediction
- The 'NFL mascot names' quiz
Breaking News
Trending News
TODAY'S BEST
Cowboys' problem with Micah Parsons may hand Steelers a franchise QB
The Pittsburgh Steelers have been one of the most-talked-about NFL organizations throughout the course of the 2025 offseason. One of the biggest headlines that was attached to the franchise involved a rare May trade that sent George Pickens to the Dallas Cowboys. Many expected the wide receiver to be dealt before or during the NFL Draft, but after a move didn't occur, it was believed that he would play out the final year of his rookie contract in the Steel City. Now, he is teaming up with CeeDee Lamb in the NFC, and a duo has been formed that could be very dangerous. Unfortunately for fans of the Cowboys, the two wide receivers have not been the talk of Dallas' training camp. Team owner Jerry Jones is playing hardball with edge-rusher Micah Parsons, and the talented defender recently requested a trade. The decision not to pay Parsons yet has left Jones under intense scrutiny, given the fact that the pass-rusher is one of the league's best. Jones' recent comments also show how dysfunctional the situation has become. In a recent appearance on ESPN's "Get Up," respected analyst Dan Orlovsky found a way to relate Parsons' situation to quarterback Dak Prescott, insinuating that if Jones does indeed trade Parsons, Prescott's Super Bowl window in Dallas would close. "If they trade [Parsons], and I don't think they do, if they trade him, it declares the Dak Prescott era over," Orlovsky said. "This team has no shot of winning a Super Bowl without Micah Parsons. No shot, and if you're doing it, it's to acquire a ton of first-round picks, so you have the ammunition to go get an Arch Manning of the future." The Steelers are set to have 12 draft picks in 2026, which gives the front office plenty of options when it comes to bringing in the next franchise quarterback. Instead of drafting one, however, could an available Prescott be a target for general manager Omar Khan? Orlovsky believes trading Parsons away would upset the Cowboys' best players. "There's no way that you can go to your locker room with Dak Prescott, CeeDee Lamb, some of the first-round picks you have on your offensive line, Trevon Diggs, and go, 'Hey, go beat Philadelphia when you don't have Micah Parsons. Go beat the Rams when you don't have Micah Parsons.' Your locker room will sit there and go like, 'Oh, well you've obviously moved on, so we're going to start our process of moving on as well.'" Any team interested in acquiring Prescott would have to take a long look at his contract. Some of the cap hits are astronomical in the coming years, but Khan is known to be a guru when it comes to the finances in deals. There's no reason to believe that he couldn't make something work for Prescott if a trade were to happen during the 2026 offseason. Fans in Dallas shouldn't be panicking just yet, but there were already some rumors about Prescott's long-term position with the Cowboys during the 2025 offseason. Certain reports were eventually debunked because it was quite literally impossible for Jones to entertain the idea of dealing Prescott after the franchise altered the quarterback's contract. Prescott has a no-trade clause, but that can always be waived, especially if he is upset about how Jones moves forward. If the Cowboys trade Parsons and pick up a plethora of draft capital, and then go on to invest in a first-round signal-caller, Prescott may be requesting to be traded as well. That's a long way away from happening, but the Steelers immediately come to mind as a team that would likely be interested. The Steelers' best-case scenario would be the emergence of Will Howard It's not easy to make a name for oneself in the NFL, and it's even tougher for players like Will Howard who were drafted in the sixth round. Pittsburgh will be in the quarterback market once again in 2026 if Aaron Rodgers is serious about retirement, so it would be a fantastic development if Howard solidifies himself as the next starter in the Steel City.
Celtics' moves suggest new guard will be traded — eventually
The Boston Celtics got under the second luxury-tax apron by trading Georges Niang to the Utah Jazz Tuesday. The move also gives them a huge incentive to deal their most expensive new player. The Celtics have dramatically reduced their payroll in the wake of Jayson Tatum's Achilles injury. With their superstar unlikely to play in 2025-26, the Celtics traded away starters Jrue Holiday ($94.4M for three years, plus a $37.2M player option in 2027-28) and Kristaps Porzingis ($30.7M next season). They also let Luke Kornet ($2.8M) leave as a free agent, and Al Horford ($9.5M) is almost certainly gone as well. They received Georges Niang ($8.2M) in the Porzingis deal, but traded him Tuesday for undrafted R.J. Luis Jr., a rookie on a two-way deal. That effectively takes Niang's full salary of their books and gets them under the second luxury-tax apron, freeing them from the penalties and restrictions that go along with second-apron status. According to cap expert Yossi Gozlan, the Celtics have saved a whopping $286M in salary and taxes with their moves. Still, the team can reap a larger long-term reward by dropping below the luxury tax entirely, which requires reducing their payroll by just over $12M more. The Celtics don't seem inclined to trade Jaylen Brown, Derrick White or Payton Pritchard, wanting to keep some core members of their 2024 title team together for Tatum's return. Sam Hauser is on an affordable four-year, $45M deal, but losing his $10M salary wouldn't get them under the tax line. That's why Anfernee Simons, acquired in the Holiday trade, is likely not long for Boston. The 26-year-old guard makes $27.7M in the last year of his contract, making him the perfect trade piece to get Boston under the luxury tax. Not only would getting under the tax line free the Celtics of their tax obligations and save them as much as $40M, but it would make them eligible to share in the money from tax-paying teams. The Celtics would also be able to avoid the dreaded repeater tax penalties, which make every dollar over the luxury-tax number progressively more expensive every year a team stays over the tax line. This doesn't mean Simons is going to be traded this summer. Boston has until the Feb. 5 trade deadline to move Simons, since luxury tax is calculated on the team's total payroll the last day of the season. But given the massive savings they'd get back from losing Simons' salary, it seems inevitable. The Celtics have lost a lot of talent this summer, but they've saved a tremendous amount of money in the process. They might have to attach draft capital to get off Simons' deal, but if he plays well in Boston, he might even bring back something in a trade next season. Tatum's injury threw a huge wrench in the Celtics' plans. If they can use this season to get under the luxury tax, they'll have the flexibility to reload and contend again when their star is back in a year.
Celtics’ Georges Niang Trade Wasn’t Just About Salary Dump
The Boston Celtics have made yet another curious offseason move, trading 32-year-old 3-point specialist Georges Niang and two second-round picks to the Utah Jazz in exchange for RJ Luis Jr., an undrafted rookie on a two-way contract. On the surface, this trade was more or less a salary dump. While a rebuilding team, the Jazz are expected to absorb Niang’s 2024-25 salary ($8.2 million) in the trade exception they generated from shipping John Collins to the Los Angeles Clippers. This reduced Boston’s luxury tax by $50 million, according Third Apron salary cap expert Yossi Gozlan. For their efforts, the Jazz not only got a pair of second-rounders but a veteran that can teach their young players the nuances of professionalism. Celtics’ Georges Niang Trade Wasn’t Just About Salary Dump Though the Celtics obviously wanted to reduce their bill, the deal wasn’t just about that. Boston genuinely wanted Luis, per ZAGSBLOG draft expert Adam Zagoria. With that in mind, he entered the 2025 NBA Draft out of St. John’s, he played his freshman season at local UMass. That season, he averaged 11.5 points per game on 45.5 percent from the field. He also earned 10 starts, averaging 15.5 points per game in those contests. As a junior in 2024-25, Luis exploded for 18.2 points per game. His season ended on a low note. In a nine-point loss to Arkansas in the NCAA Tournament’s Round of 32, he went just 3-17 from the field, scoring nine points. Nonetheless, his body of work shouldn’t be overshadowed by the last sentence. Nor should the pedigree he enters the NBA with. In 2024-25, he was a Consensus All-American. His father, Reggie Charles, was a professional basketball player who spent 15 seasons overseas. For the last two seasons of his college career, he was coached by Rick Pitino. The Celtics undoubtedly have a complex history with their former head coach but there’s no denying his greatness at the collegiate level. What Can RJ Luis Jr. Bring To The Celtics? Flawed though he may be, Luis is a good get for Boston, especially on a two-way contract. With Jayson Tatum likely to miss at least the first half of 2025-26 after tearing his Achilles in the 2025 NBA Playoffs, the Celtics have a lot of minutes to fill in at forward. As a result, players like 2023 No. 38 pick Jordan Walsh and 2025 No. 28 pick Hugo Gonzalez have a real chance of barging into the rotation. In a vacuum, they’re both rotation-caliber forwards but they’re raw, particularly offensively. That being said, if they’re trying to step into Tatum’s shoes, their limitations at that end are problematic. Tatum’s one of the most dangerous scorers in the league, averaging 27.5 points per game over the past five seasons. Luis probably won’t explode onto the season looking like a perennial All-Star. Still, he’s a more masterful scorer than either Walsh or Gonzalez right now. In the open court, he’s exciting, like many athletic wings with his length (6-foot-7). Yet, he’s not refined to impacting the game on the break. In the halfcourt, he’s able to use his handle and footwork to create space whether in the drive or in the post. Indeed, utilizing his instincts and body control, he’s actually pretty nifty with the ball in his hands. He even follows up his own shot, leading to frequent putbacks. Though he doesn’t have elite efficiency in any area, he’s a multifaceted offensive player who also has a knack for playmaking, particularly with regard to pocket passes. To improve his efficiency, he should cut down on his off-the-dribble attempts due to his tendency to take tough jumpers. All the same, while Boston waits for Tatum to return, the 22-year-old could play an important role.
The teams that should have won the Stanley Cup (but didn't)
In the words of the great Minnesotan indie rocker Paul Westerberg, “opportunity knocks once, then the door slams shut.” In the doldrums of summer, fans of the Edmonton Oilers have nothing to but wonder if their opportunity really is gone and watch their CFL team lose. It is exceedingly difficult to find the right mix of talent, defense and guts to reach the Stanley Cup Final, a feat Edmonton achieved during each of the past two postseasons. Without a ring to show for it, thanks to the rival Florida Panthers, all they got for their troubles was two years closer to the end of Connor McDavid’s contract, which runs out next summer. Despair won’t set in for Oilers fans until they’re certain the window is closed, that McDavid is leaving, or both, but it can be difficult to see the writing on the wall before it’s too late. Countless teams with strong, sustained runs near the top have convinced themselves next year will be the one, only to find out that last year was the one, and they missed it. I’ve pored through post-expansion NHL history to identify four era-specific teams that had the talent and the opportunity to win the Stanley Cup but couldn’t get over the hump. You’ll find out why they could have won, when they should have and why they didn’t in one list of great teams you won’t be eager to see your favorite club join. New York Rangers (1971-75) Why they should have won: Coming off consecutive 109-point seasons and a six-game loss to Bobby Orr’s Bruins in the 1972 Cup Final, the Blueshirts boasted veteran standouts like superstar center Jean Ratelle and sniper Rod Gilbert as well as up-and-coming stars like all-world D-man Brad Park and two-way pivot Walt Tkaczuk. Backstopped by Eddie Giacomin and led by Emile Francis behind the bench, the Rangers were one of just four elite teams in a top-heavy league. In the summer of 1972, three of those teams lost key men to the upstart WHA: Boston could not match Cleveland’s offer for playoff hero Gerry Cheevers, the Chicago Blackhawks watched Bobby Hull (literally) accept a giant check to play in Winnipeg, and Montreal Canadiens’ star puck mover J.C. Tremblay became the inaugural captain of their eventual rivals the Quebec Nordiques. The Rangers spent freely on extensions to avoid an exodus of their own and seemed destined to conquer the NHL within the next few seasons. Why they didn’t: After falling short to the high-flying Bruins and gritty Hawks in the early part of the 1970s, the Rangers then fell prey to a pair of emerging superpowers. In 1974 and 1975, they lost winner-takes-all games to the rival Philadelphia Flyers and New York Islanders, respectively. The following season Francis, who doubled as GM and was frustrated by his inability to cash in on the already waning distraction of the WHA, swung a desperate trade that sent Park and Ratelle to Boston for Carol Vadnais and an aging Phil Esposito. He was fired shortly thereafter. ‘Espo’ was better than you remember on Broadway, averaging over 35 goals per 82 games, but his stint as captain was a dud. New York would miss the postseason entirely in Esposito’s first two seasons before Swedish imports Ulf Nilsson and Anders Hedberg helped him fire the Rangers to a trivia question Cup berth in ‘79. Still, their best chance at winning it all left town with Park and Ratelle, both of whom enjoyed brilliant second acts in Boston. Biggest miss: Just months after shrewdly insulating himself from the fallout of the WHA’s formation, Francis’s plan for world domination was already working like a charm. Esposito, then the joint talisman of Boston’s irresistible attack, went down with a serious knee injury two games into a first-round Stanley Cup rematch. The Blueshirts proceeded to overwhelm Orr with their forecheck as Tkaczuk and Calder-winner Steve Vickers combined to fire nine goals past Cheevers’ old partner Eddie Johnston and a 44-year-old Jacques Plante. Perhaps Park and Gilbert were too preoccupied imagining their names being etched onto the Cup after trouncing the B’s in five to remember they still had another two series to win: the Rangers were badly unprepared for what came next. In the semifinal round against the Blackhawks, Dennis Hull torched New York for five goals and 10 points while Tony Esposito held the Rangers to 10 goals total. The five-game stand was never close, and the stars wouldn’t align for the Rangers for another 21 years. Philadelphia Flyers (1995-98) Why they should have won: After missing out on a major upset of the almighty Oilers in Game Seven of the 1987 Stanley Cup Final and losing to the Canadiens in the 1989 Conference Final, the Philadelphia Flyers quickly fell apart. By the summer of 1992, the Flyers had shipped off Brian Propp, Dave Poulin, and Rick Tocchet, among others. The only notable return pieces were explosive winger Mark Recchi (acquired from PIT for Tocchet) and a young power forward named Rod Brind’Amour (acquired from STL for Ron Sutter). Amid an unprecedented playoff drought, the Flyers still needed more firepower, so they went and got some heavy ordinance at the 1992 NHL Entry Draft. The Orange and Black paid a king’s ransom to the Nordiques for their unsigned No. 1 pick from 1991, Eric Lindros, who arrived in Philly with unparalleled (and wholly justified) hype. The Flyers were back in the postseason within three years after team legend Bobby Clarke took the helm as GM for the second time in 1994 and traded Recchi for future 50-goal winger John Leclair and roving defenseman Eric Desjardins. Their core complete, Lindros, Brind’Amour, Leclair, and Swedish sniper Mikael Renberg gave the Flyers the biggest, baddest and best top six in the NHL. Why they didn’t: The Flyers picked a bad time for their ascendency, losing their deepest playoff runs to a couple of signature teams from the turn of the century. The 1995 New Jersey Devils and the 1997 Detroit Red Wings both found ways to neutralize Lindros (by his standards, at least) and exploit the Flyers’ so-so depth on their way to the Cup. Philadelphia’s goaltending wasn’t much help, either. Matching up an aging, temperamental Ron Hextall and his assorted platoonmates against an Eastern Conference murderer’s row featuring Martin Brodeur, Dominik Hasek and Curtis Joseph was something like bringing a water balloon to a gun fight. Biggest miss: No one could blame the Flyboys for their four-game dismantling at the hands of the Detroit Red Wings in 1997. That the Flyers were ever favored against the Wings, who boasted eight future Hall-of-Famers, speaks to their imposing reputation during the late 1990s. Philadelphia’s true misfires bumpered their lone Cup appearance of the Lindros era. Getting goalie’d by John Vanbiesbrouck in 1996 was bad enough, but Clarke’s attempts to secure a rematch with Detroit in 1998 were almost comically misguided. His new coaching hire, Bruins’ legend Wayne Cashman, was demoted after 61 games in favor of Roger Neilson. His big RFA signing, Chris Gratton, was a dud who would end up back in Tampa within 14 months. A chaotic season ended quietly as Hasek and the Buffalo Sabres stifled Philly in five games. Lindros and Clarke would fall out in a protracted saga over the next three years, and the Flyers stumbled into two decades of mediocrity and infinite “what-ifs?” after the end of the Big E’s brief, brilliant run at the top. Vancouver Canucks (2009-12) Why they should have won: Marc Crawford, Markus Naslund and the "West Coast Express" era of early-2000s Canucks hockey are a case study in how rarely fun hockey and winning hockey intersect. The goals flowed freely, but Vancouver’s wide-open style and bad goaltending were a lethal mix in the postseason. Crawford got the axe after a pedestrian 2005-06 campaign, and new bench boss Alain Vigneault made it his mission to mold the free-scoring ‘Nucks into an elite defensive group. "AV" got a big headstart that same offseason when Naslund’s buddy Todd Bertuzzi was dealt for Roberto Luongo. Naslund followed Crawford and Bertuzzi out the door before long, and Vigneault rebuilt his leadership group around superstar goalie Luongo, the already-established Sedin twins, and future Selke-winner Ryan Kesler. By 2010-11, that core was supported by perhaps the deepest blue line of the cap era: Kevin Bieksa, Alex Edler, Christian Erhoff, Dan Hamhuis and Sami Salo. The results were predictably dominant. With a first-placed offense, first-placed defense and first-placed team, the Canucks marched on toward their championship destiny. Why they didn’t: Would it be too cute to type “Tim Thomas” and finish up? After a first-round war with the defending champion Blackhawks, a tough series against Hamhuis’s old friends in Nashville, and a five-game walkthrough of a formidable Sharks team in the WCF, the Canucks found the one question for which they had no answer: Thomas, the Bruins’ star netminder. The portly, 37-year-old Vezina winner concluded his improbable rise to glory at Vancouver’s expense on and off the ice, shipping just eight goals in seven games. The memory of the scrambling, scruffy Thomas must still haunt the brothers Sedin, who lost to three straight Cup champions from 2010-12. Biggest miss: It’s hard to run down any runner-up. Winning three series is never easy, and taking Boston to Game Seven while so impotent on offense was a credit to the Canucks’ ability to grind out tough wins. The next season, their resolve wasn’t quite as apparent. Despite having locked up a second-straight Presidents’ Trophy, Vancouver got blown away in five games by the eighth-seeded L.A. Kings. You may recall how well that year went for the Kings, who never faced elimination and didn’t even see Game Six until the Cup Final. In retrospect, the Canucks could have had a similarly easy path. Instead, some combination of Jonathan Quick’s heroics in goal, an injury to Daniel Sedin, and the offseason departure of Erhoff prevented Vancouver from breaking down a stubborn Kings defense. It would be eight years before the ‘Nucks won another series. San Jose Sharks (2016-19) Why they should have won: The Sharks’ section of this piece could encompass over a decade from when the team traded for Joe Thornton in 2005 until his playoff swansong in the Bay Area in 2019. The newly elected Hall of Famer’s excellence and longevity were such that San Jose was never too far away from contention while he was around. The Sharks missed the playoffs just twice during Thornton’s tenure and won at least a series on nine occasions. It’s ironic, then, that their best chance at a Stanley Cup came just as “Jumbo” began to fade into the background. In desperate need of a refresh after the team’s first postseason miss of the Thornton era, GM Doug Wilson replaced longtime coach Todd McLellan with former Devils’ bench boss Pete DeBoer in the 2015 offseason. Joe Pavelski, meanwhile, ended a captaincy carousel that had seen both 17-year man Patrick Marleau and Thornton stripped of the ‘C’ over the previous five years. The leadership changes worked, and with late bloomer Brent Burns emerging as one of the most dangerous blue line scorers in the sport and primed stars Pavelski and Logan Couture grabbing the torch from the old guard of Thornton and Marleau, San Jose seemed ready to end Chicago and L.A.’s lengthy reign over the West. Why they didn’t: The Sharks did end the Blackhawks/Kings Cup streak by finally conquering their boogeyman, Jonathan Quick, who posted a .931 postseason SV% against San Jose from 2013-14. This time, Quick’s postseason magic ran dry as Pavelski beat him five times in a short and sweet series. Postseason scoring leader Couture (10 G, 30 P in 24 GP) played the hero in the next round, a seven-game war against the Nashville Predators, before Pavelski exploded for another four tallies in the Western Conference Final against the St. Louis Blues, who had earlier vanquished Chicago. With the Kings and Blackhawks out of the way (semi-permanently, as it would turn out), all that was left for the Sharks was to topple the Eastern Conference champion. The problem? That team happened to be the fired-up, Sidney Crosby-led Penguins, who were under plenty of pressure to win themselves after eight ringless years. San Jose seemed to lose heart after going down 0-2 in overtime on the road, and Thornton, who racked up 82 regular-season points and 18 postseason assists that year, never fully recovered from the futile 106-game grind. Worst miss: 2016 was effectively the last hurrah for Thornton, at best a middle-sixer for the remainder of his Sharks career, and Marleau, who signed with Toronto a year later, but the team itself had plenty of juice left. That made it all the more frustrating when San Jose bowed out to McLellan and Connor McDavid’s untested Oilers in 2017 and the expansion Vegas Golden Knights the next year. By 2018-19, Pavelski was 34 and out of contract, and Wilson knew it was time to push his chips in for one last run at glory. The Sharks paid a small fortune in separate trades for Norris-winner Erik Karlsson and power forward Evander Kane, and, after an emotional comeback from 3-0 down against the Knights, it looked as though Wilson had built a team of destiny. Instead, the Cinderella St. Louis Blues took revenge for 2016 by shredding San Jose’s bottom-ten defense. St. Louis went on to lock up their first Stanley Cup a few weeks later, and Pavelski would leave California as a free agent that summer. Pavelski’s departure, Couture’s injury woes, and the exorbitant trade and contract costs associated with Karlsson plunged the Sharks into a deep, dark rebuild that has only recently begun to show signs of life.
Quiz of the Day Newsletter
If you enjoy sports quizzes, you'll love Yardbarker's Quiz of the Day Newsletter, home to the best sports quizzes anywhere.
- Join the thousands of sports fans who are already addicted.
- Challenge your friends, or play solo.
- Always free!
Subscribe now!
PRIVACY POLICY EDITORIAL POLICY CONTACT US
ABOUT YARDBARKER TERMS OF SERVICE
Use of this website (including any and all parts and
components) constitutes your acceptance of these
Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
This site is for entertainment purposes only.
There is no gambling offered on this site.
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
