Yardbarker
x
When and where Caleb Williams is at his best and worst for Bears
Caleb Williams is better in many ways this season except he has complained about his out-of-pocket accuracy. There are other issues, as well. Geoff Burke-Imagn Images

Caleb Williams is a different player under Ben Johnson, even if the statistics in terms of completion percentage and win-loss record after seven games say otherwise.

His situational breakdown says as much, although in some ways the improvement isn't as obvious heading into the eighth game under Johnson.

Down by down Williams better on first down and third down than he  was last season, but has become much worse on second down.

On third downs he is money: 67.2% completions, 39-of-58 for 528 yards with four TDs, two interceptions and a 104.7 passer rating.

On first-down plays he is even better, at 66.7% completions (58 of 87) for 693 yards with four touchdowns, no interceptions and a 106.2 passer rating. His 8.0 yards per attempt on first down is outstanding.

Second down woes

But on second down, he is completing only 53.5% for 396 yards (38 of 71) with no touchdowns, two interceptions and a 58.2 passer rating. This is way down from last year, when he had an 86.0 rating (1,186 yards, 115 of 196) and 58.7% completions. The 5.6 yards he is averaging per second-down attempt is feeble. Even with better stats last year, he was averaging only 6.1 yards an attempt then.

Being on the road Sunday against the Bengals will be a challenge  for him because he has only an 84.0 passer rating in road games. That's only a little better than he was last year on the road (80.8). His home passer rating this year is 99.5 and a little better than last year (94.6) but the Bears schedule this year definitely is easier at home.

There has been much concern over the last three games about Williams playing in the red zone. There should be. He's worse there than last year. His passer rating in the red zone is 86.9 and last year was 96.8.

That's not the point on the field where Williams is at his  worst. He has a horrendous 42.4 passer rating inside his own 20, and last year was at 79.0.

He as a passer rating of 96.5 when operating between the opposing 20 and midfield, an improvement over 86.4 last year. He's also better from his own 20 to midfield this year, with a passer rating of 90.0 and only 82.5 last year.

When it comes to point differentials, the comparisons are a little less meaningful because he had to operate most of last season facing deficits but he has a 93.8 passer rating this year when trailing and was 84.9 last year.

Williams struggles leading

Can Williams stand prosperity? Can Johnson? It's when they're winning this year that Williams isn't operating all that effectively. It suggests he and Johnson need to blend his passing in with the run better.

He has a passer rating of 80.2 with the lead and last year finished 111.4 with a lead. When he's leading this year by eight or less, his passer rating is only 76.0 while last year it was 103.7.

Passer ratings when leading by more than one score and conversion aren't as important when teams usually are operating within a range of one score either way in NFL games, but when the Bears were up nine or more this year Williams has a 93.4 passer rating, but last year in the rare instances they had a lead that big he had a 140.5 passer rating.

Those situational stats suggest there's more going on than just Williams here. The way Ben Johnson is calling plays at different points on the field and in different scoring circumstances matters.

The bottom line is Williams is better, but he needs to be better on second  down, on the road, in the red zone and in games when he gets a lead. And Johnson needs to be better in all of those circumstances as well.

This article first appeared on Chicago Bears on SI and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!