By Mike Huesmann
Surely many of you saw the news this past week that the College Football Hall of Fame lowered its winning percentage threshold from 60 percent to 59.5 percent. This is universally seen as a nod to former Texas Tech, Washington State and Mississippi State coach Mike Leach, allowing for his induction since he has passed away in 2022.
He is certainly a worthy candidate for induction—I’m not taking that away. But I will outline reasons why this changing of the threshold shouldn’t have happened.
“There’s nothing balanced about 50% Run and 50% Pass - that’s 50% stupid.
— Coach Dan Casey (@CoachDanCasey) May 30, 2025
What is balanced is if you have 5 skill positions and all 5 are contributing the offensive effort in a somewhat equal fashion.”
-Mike Leach (on Offensive Balance) pic.twitter.com/GOKry40qW0
Every candidate should be explained on their own and individually of others. I would tell the HOF administration that if your voters are so obtuse that they need these arbitrary guidelines, you have the wrong people voting.
Not all coaching wins are created equal. For example, guys like Larry Coker and Tom Osborne both inherited elite programs at the height of national prominence. You’re going to win more games in those cases. Osborne is a candidate for the Mount Rushmore of head coaches and certainly belongs in. Coker meets all the requirements, but does he really belong?
That’s where the voters have to be skilled, knowledgeable and understand context. Should former Pitt and Arizona State head coach Todd Graham be elected? His winning percentage is 59, identical to Leach. If we’re only going by figures you can’t tell me he should be left out.
We should all rejoice that an injustice has been rectified. Todd Graham is now HOF eligible. https://t.co/ZzFBueMLc9
— Mike Huesmann (@HuesmannCFB) May 29, 2025
For every blue-blood scenario previously listed, like Osborne and Coker, there are teams on the outs who need a coach.
This brings us to Howard Schnellenberger. He took over a Miami team who was terrible and made them into a national title winner, juggernaut and arguably the team of the 1980s, going 41-16. Later on, he started from scratch at Florida Atlantic, literally. The Owls didn’t even have a team. He spent three years working there before a game was even played.
You’re not going to win games early on in college football when you are brand new. Schnellenberger stayed there for 11 years and went 58-74. This dropped his overall winning percentage to 50.6, making him ineligible. Knowing what he did at Miami and building that program should be enough.
Glad Mike Leach will now be eligible for the College HOF (he deserves to be in) but the NFF didn't fix its problem. Many of the coaches in there aren't close to that .595 win %. Howard Schnellenberger isn't in, and he definitely belongs in there: https://t.co/aavdFNzIlG
— Bruce Feldman (@BruceFeldmanCFB) May 29, 2025
The standard shouldn’t exist for the above reasons. Since it does, I also don’t know if lowering it is right. We should be striving for excellence and dominance—this isn’t the Hall of Pretty Good.
If you want to elect Leach as a contributor or pioneer, go for it, but just lessening the restrictions on everyone could have consequences we aren’t thinking about.
These are coaches not in the Hall of Fame who now you could make a case for.
Rich Rodriguez: Also 59 percent and every bit the innovator Leach was. His spread option concepts have been all over the game since he designed the concept 20 years ago.
Erk Russell: 1-AA (FCS) legend at Georgia Southern. Only a head coach for seven years, he won three national titles.
Bill Yeoman: Multiple Southwest Conference title championships at Houston when that conference was a gauntlet.
Paul Johnson: Last of the true triple-option gurus. He won everywhere and is beloved by all. Georgia Southern, Navy, Georgia Tech all did it with him.
Sonny Lubick: Built Colorado State into a relevant program. Among the best Group of 5 coaches we’ve seen.
Joe Tiller: Coached the Boilermakers to a Rose Bowl and mentored Drew Brees. Very few head coaches have won at Purdue—he did.
Dave McLain: McLain tragically passed away at Wisconsin while still on the job. His 59 percent winning doesn’t tell the story of how bad the Badgers were before him and Barry Alvarez. The Big Ten Coach of the Year Award bears his name.
Sonny Lubick’s career win percentage is .593 ♂️
— Kevin Lytle (@Kevin_Lytle) May 29, 2025
So silly that such an arbitrary number is keeping him out of the Hall. Literally one more win would hit this mark. Sonny should be in the HOF https://t.co/nMaKmE2iAB
More must-reads:
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!
Pro Football Hall of Famer Warren Moon just made headlines during a recent appearance on "Up Adams," where he gave his take on one of the NFL’s most debated questions. When asked which star quarterback will win a Super Bowl first, Lamar Jackson, Josh Allen or Joe Burrow, Moon without any hesitation went with Jackson. “We have Josh Allen, MVP, Lamar Jackson, Joe Burrow, they wrecked the league last year… Which one of those three do you think has the best shot to get one this year?” Kay Adams asked. Moon responded, “I think Lamar.” Moon’s reasoning for this take was not due to stats or accolades, because both have great numbers and awards, rather Moon was focused on the surrounding cast around Jackson. While he was complimentary of Allen and the team around him, he emphasized that the Ravens had a strong secondary, incredible running back and solid wideouts that could allow them to be a serious threat to win it all. It is easy to see why Moon made his opinion clear and without hesitation. Jackson is one of the top quarterbacks in the league, with four Pro Bowl nods, three All-Pro selections and two MVP awards. He is the best dual-threat quarterback in the world, and now with an incredible roster around him, Jackson has become much scarier. However, pressure is mounting on the superstar QB, and Moon did make the case for Allen to also potentially win first. “Josh Allen, they’ll be right there too. I think it depends on who plays who in the playoffs … You have to go through playing both Kansas City and Baltimore if you’re Buffalo, and same thing if you’re the Ravens, you gotta play both of those to get to the Super Bowl … But if you only have to play one of them, that would be great.” Allen is also regarded as one of the league’s best QBs too, and Moon's argument has a lot of merit to it. Both Buffalo and Baltimore are flooded with talented pieces that are hungry to make that Super Bowl run. It could come down to matchups come playoff time. If one squad has an easier route to the AFC Championship game, then it might be the one who ultimately comes out on top. As for Burrow, Moon did not mention him in the conversation, but clearly it was not meant to be a slight on him as a player. Rather, for obvious reasons, it seems that Moon might have Baltimore and Buffalo as overall rosters in a higher tier from Cincinnati. Ultimately however, time will tell who breaks first. But if Moon is correct, Jackson might finally be able to silence his critics, and make his mark on NFL history.
The Toronto Maple Leafs continue to explore ways to upgrade the roster following Mitch Marner's departure in free agency. The Leafs front office has been trying to fill in the gaps along the roster, and they have been searching on the trade front. One name that has been heavily connected to the Maple Leafs in recent weeks is Calgary Flames star Nazem Kadri. Kadri could replace Marner very well in the lineup, but it seems that a deal could be complicated to complete. According to NHL insider Nick Kypreos of SportsNet, Toronto has tried to land Kadri multiple times this summer, only to be rebuffed each time. Kypreos believes that a deal involving Kadri returning to the Maple Leafs could be unlikely at this point in the summer. Last season, Kadri posted 35 goals and 32 assists for the Flames. His presence has been steady on the ice for years, and Calgary could probably get a lot on the trade market for him. The Maple Leafs will likely continue to explore ways to pry Kadri from the Flames. But Calgary likely won't trade him unless it receives an offer that it deems too good to be true. But Kadri is the leader of this team, and he was the best player for them last season. Toronto doesn't have a lot of tradable assets to work with, which could be what is holding things up between the two sides. The veteran could give Toronto a nice boost, but unless the Maple Leafs up the offer, he isn't returning to town.
The Chicago Blackhawks, a crowded goaltending situation and trade rumors involving the Edmonton Oilers have fans wondering if the Stars' rivals could soon upgrade their crease before training camp. With training camp approaching, Chicago general manager Kyle Davidson has five goalies under contract, including Spencer Knight, Arvid Soderblom, Drew Commesso, newly signed Stanislav Berezhnoy, and veteran Laurent Brossoit. Only two NHL roster spots are available, which has fueled speculation that Brossoit could be moved to a contender, with Edmonton emerging as a leading candidate. For Stars fans, seeing the Oilers potentially bolster their crease should raise eyebrows. Edmonton, fresh off a deep playoff run, is looking to avoid the same issues that hurt them late in the postseason. "The Blackhawks have too many goalies and not enough spots, and Brossoit's contract and experience make him a natural trade chip for a team like the Oilers."-Julien Trekker Chicago's goalie logjam and Berezhnoy's recent signing are detailed further at NHL.com. Dallas could see its rival upgrade as Blackhawks explore trading Laurent Brossoit Brossoit, 32, carries a $3.3 million cap hit for one more season. Drafted by Calgary in 2011, he's appeared in 140 NHL games, including time with Edmonton, Winnipeg, and Vegas, where he helped the Golden Knights win the Stanley Cup in 2023. While Chicago decides, Drew Commesso continues to push for NHL time after posting a .911 save percentage over 39 AHL games. For a deeper look at Commesso's performance, his full profile is on Elite Prospects. I think if Edmonton lands Brossoit or even Commesso, Dallas may have to plan around a deeper Oilers team come playoff time, especially given how tight the Western race looks on paper.
The Yankees aren’t hiding what they need at the deadline, especially after the weekend series in Atlanta. They need pitching, and more pitching. They need a frontline starter if they can get one. A back-end arm and high-leverage reliever if they can’t. According to former MLB GM Jim Bowden of The Athletic, that help is expected to come via trade and will cost prospects. But which ones? For now, Spencer Jones and George Lombard Jr. look like keepers, Bowden reports. The Yankees have been careful not to dangle either in serious talks. That leaves a deep and evolving tier just beneath them of talented, but more expendable prospects in the right deal. Right-hander Chase Hampton is out this year after Tommy John surgery but still has value in the industry. Cam Schlittler or Brendan Beck could be part of a multi-arm package. Carlos Lagrange and Elmer Rodriguez Cruz offer upside in A-ball, but they’re likely a year or two away. It’s also possible the Yankees dangle recent draftee Griffin Herring, a high-floor lefty from LSU, or infielder Roc Riggio, who’s quickly becoming a fan favorite but is blocked long-term. If they’re shopping for bullpen help, a one-for-one swap involving someone like Rafael Flores, a promising catcher at Double-A, could get it done. One name to watch is Everson Pereira. Once seen as a potential long-term outfielder in the Bronx, Pereira’s injuries and inconsistent bat have pushed him to the edge of the 40-man roster. He still has tools and could be the centerpiece in a deal for a reliever or platoon bat. The Yankees have built up enough prospect depth to move from it. And with the market light on sellers, creativity and control years could matter more than pure prospect rankings. If a trade comes, it’s likely someone from this group gets the call, but not to the Bronx. it.