x
Penguins’ 3 Worst Contracts Entering 2026-27
Ryan Graves, Pittsburgh Penguins (Amy Irvin / The Hockey Writers)

The Pittsburgh Penguins still have cap flexibility, but that does not mean every contract on the roster is clean. President of hockey operations and general manager Kyle Dubas has done a better job lately of avoiding long-term mistakes, but Pittsburgh is still carrying a few deals that could make roster building harder entering the 2026-27 season.

That matters because the Penguins are in a strange place. They are not rebuilding in the traditional sense, but they are also not loaded enough to ignore inefficient money. Pittsburgh needs value contracts around Sidney Crosby, younger players who can outperform their cap hits and enough flexibility to keep reshaping the roster.

The Penguins’ cap space gives Dubas room to work, but bad contracts can still matter even when a team is not pressed against the ceiling. They can block younger players, hurt trade flexibility, force awkward roster decisions and create dead money if a buyout becomes the only realistic escape.

Here are the Penguins’ three worst contracts entering 2026-27.

Ryan Graves Has the Worst Deal on the Roster

Ryan Graves‘ contract is easily the worst, and it is not particularly close.

Graves is signed for three more seasons at a $4.5 million cap hit, which is the exact kind of deal that becomes painful when the player is not clearly part of the team’s best six defensemen. His contract runs through 2028-29, and that term is what separates it from the rest of Pittsburgh’s problem deals.

The issue is not only that Graves has struggled. It is that the Penguins have already started building around him instead of with him. Pittsburgh has added Samuel Girard, Kaedan Korczak, Trevor van Riemsdyk, Declan Carlile and other defensive options while still carrying Graves’ number. The left side remains a question, but Graves has not done enough to make himself the answer.

That is why this deal could eventually have a case as the worst contract in Penguins franchise history. That is a strong statement, but the argument is simple: Graves was signed to stabilize the blue line, not become a long-term cap problem. If Pittsburgh spends several more seasons trying to hide, trade or buy out a $4.5 million defenseman who cannot claim a steady role, the contract will age about as poorly as any deal the organization has handed out.

A buyout would not be painless either. The Graves buyout structure would stretch the mistake across multiple seasons, and that is the kind of lingering penalty the Penguins should be trying to avoid during a roster transition.

Erik Karlsson’s Contract Still Limits Flexibility

Erik Karlsson is still a productive player, so this is not the same kind of contract problem as Graves. Karlsson had 15 goals and 51 assists for 66 points last season, which remains high-end offensive production from the blue line.

His 2025-26 production is the reason this conversation has to be handled with some balance. The problem is the cap hit and the fit.

Karlsson carries a $10 million Penguins cap hit entering the final year of his deal, and that is a massive number for a team still trying to become younger and more flexible. The Penguins can live with it for one more season, but that does not make it efficient. Pittsburgh needs a clearer defensive structure, and Karlsson’s contract still shapes almost everything the team can do on the right side.

The right side already has Kris Letang, Korczak, and van Riemsdyk. That creates a crowd, and Karlsson’s number makes the group harder to balance. The Penguins’ Karlsson decision has been sitting over the organization for a while because moving him would not be simple, especially with his contract size and control over his future.

Karlsson can still help Pittsburgh, which is why his contract is not the team’s worst. But at $10 million, he has to be more than useful. He has to be a major driver, and the Penguins have to decide whether one more season of that cap hit helps their retool or delays the next version of the roster.

Trevor van Riemsdyk Deal Carries Early Risk

van Riemsdyk’s contract is not a disaster yet, but it carries enough risk to land on this list.

The Penguins signed van Riemsdyk to a two-year, $8 million deal with a $4 million cap hit, and that number is aggressive for a 35-year-old defensive defenseman. His new contract runs through 2027-28, which means Pittsburgh is not only paying for a veteran stopgap this season. It is also carrying the deal into next season.

The argument for the signing is understandable. The defenseman gives head coach Dan Muse another experienced right-shot defenseman who can kill penalties, play lower in the lineup and bring some stability. The Penguins needed more defensive structure, and van Riemsdyk has been around long enough to know what he is.

The issue is price versus role. A $4 million cap hit is a lot if van Riemsdyk settles in as a third-pair defenseman, especially when the Penguins already have Karlsson, Letang, and Korczak on the right side. The van Riemsdyk signing makes more sense if he plays meaningful defensive minutes, but it looks much worse if he becomes another expensive veteran blocking younger or more flexible options.

That is why this deal is more about risk than proven damage. It could be fine if van Riemsdyk gives Pittsburgh two steady seasons. It could also become another example of paying too much for defensive certainty that only looks certain on paper.

Penguins Have to Avoid More Graves-Type Mistakes

The Graves contract is the warning. Karlsson’s deal is the short-term weight. Van Riemsdyk’s contract is the new risk.

That is the lesson for Pittsburgh. The Penguins can live with some inefficient money because they still have flexibility, but the organization cannot afford to keep stacking questionable commitments. This roster is already trying to balance the final years of the Crosby-era core with a younger group that needs more opportunity.

That is why Pittsburgh’s broader trade-board conversation matters. Dubas needs to keep looking for impact talent, but he also has to protect the cap sheet from mistakes that reduce his options. The Penguins need contracts that either produce value now or preserve flexibility later.

Graves does neither at the moment. Karlsson produces, but the cap hit is still heavy. Van Riemsdyk may help, but the contract already comes with questions.

The Penguins’ worst contracts do not completely ruin the roster, but they show why the next few decisions matter so much. Pittsburgh has enough cap room to keep working, enough veterans to remain competitive and enough young players to make the future interesting.

What it cannot afford is another deal that looks like Graves. If that contract keeps aging the way it has, it may not just be the worst deal on the current roster. It could become one of the worst the franchise has ever had.

This article first appeared on The Hockey Writers and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!