There’s been an unquestionably positive narrative surrounding the Canadiens’ fully-assumed rebuild since the departure of Marc Bergevin and the arrival of the Hughes-Gorton (HuGo) duo.
I know, I’m an active participant in this narrative, along with 100% of other commentators and analysts of the Canadiens’ every move!
The good times are multiplying
– A plethora of astute transactions
– Several excellent draft picks: Slafkovsky, Hutson, Fowler, Demidov, Hage, Zharovsky, among others;
– Many contracts that will age well;
– Etc.
We won’t go into too much detail about all these success stories, which have already been highlighted and analyzed from every angle.
Jasons of the less good shots
However, four years after Bergevin’s departure, we can also see that some of “HuGo’s” little mistakes have already had a certain impact on the rebuild.
That’s to be expected. No director has a perfect batting average.
For the sake of objectivity, then, and to counterbalance the infinitely positive “official” narrative surrounding the rebuild, let’s take a first inventory of the least good moves that we can already begin to list with a fair degree of certainty, namely those of 2022.
1. The Artturi Lehkonen trade
Of course, Lehkonen, a modest2nd-round pick in 2013, wasn’t having such a great career with the Canadiens before being traded to the Avalanche (149 points in 396 games) in March 2022.
He also never had the chance to play with a Nathan MacKinnon..
A third-line player, a numerical disadvantage specialist, often criticized for missing too many scoring chances, his departure was not mourned for long. At most, his legendary winning goal on St-Jean-Baptiste Day against Las Vegas was remembered with nostalgia.
One gets the impression that both the Bergevin and Hughes-Gorton administrations failed to realize just how good a hockey player they had on hand. And he’s even better in the playoffs!
I was watching him the other night in the opening game against the Kings, wow! What an intense, intelligent player!
AVSF62 Arturri Lehkonen established body & stick position on the Net Front D to score. Did his job and played with purpose to win the stick on puck goal. Playoff type goal in the guts of the ice. #TLPFBreakdowns pic.twitter.com/stEVze7qB1
–
Think Less Play Faster Total Hockey
(@TLPF_Hockey) October 8, 2025
At the time, we applauded the acquisition of a promising young right-handed defenseman in Justin Barron. And, by the same token, the Lehkonen deal also helped maximize our chances of drafting atNo. 1 in 2022. That, too, was part of the plan.
Unfortunately, Barron didn’t develop as planned
Fortunately, the mistake was corrected with the acquisition of Carrier.
But we have to admit that we didn’t recognize Lehkonen’s full value, nor did we bet on the right horse when we traded him.
Sakic’s reading of the subtleties of Lehkonen’s game beat that of Barron’s potential by the Canadiens’ thinkers.
2. Romanov trade, Kirby Dach acquisition and Nazar selection in Chicago
In the minutes following the selection of winger Slafkovsky in place of centers Wright and Cooley, HuGo wanted to make another big splash in the middle of the Bell Centre with the trade of Romanov and the acquisition of Kirby Dach, a young pivot of 6’3 and over 200 lbs
Romanov was off to a great start with the Canadiens and was probably already the team’s best defensive defenseman at the time of the trade in the 2022 draft.
No matter. In theory, trading Romanov, the 38th player drafted in 2018, for the 13th and 66th picks of 2022 and using that 13th pick to acquire Dach, the3rd overall pick of 2019, was a very nice gamble.
The left side of the defense was pretty well taken care of with Guhle, Struble and Xhekaj, all sturdy fellows, at least one of whom would become as good as Romanov. We could sacrifice the Russian “bowling ball” to get our hands on a potential high-quality second center, or even a first, who knows..
Lamoriello and the Islanders knew that agent Dan Milstein was right on target in 2018 when he said his client deserved to be a top-10 pick. We clearly understood Romanov’s value as a sure thing, no matter what happened to that famous 13th pick the Habs gave up to the Hawks a few minutes later..
Alexander Romanov gets a welcome back video. Looked emotional on the bench. pic.twitter.com/eFvyJcYa6G
– Arpon Basu (@ArponBasu) February 11, 2023
Unfortunately, Dach has played just 117 games in three seasons in Montreal, and injuries have undermined his development
To this day, at nearly 25 years of age, we still don’t know if he’ll be able to approach the player HuGo had in mind for the summer of 2022 and who we’ve seen so little of since his arrival in town..
Meanwhile, Guhle plays barely more games than Dach, Struble and Xhekaj alternate in the role of 6th defenseman, while Romanov has cumulated 221 games in New York in addition to showing a plus-41 differential…
Meanwhile, Frank Nazar, ultimately selected 13th overall by the Hawks, is well on his way to becoming a star center in the NHL. Watch him against the Habs: he’s quite a hockey player!
Frank Nazar (CHI91) made an impact in his first game since signing his 7x$6.6M extension, tallying a goal and a 1st assist in the Hawks’ 3-2 loss to FLA.
Here are his most notable plays and puck touches from last night. #Blackhawks #NHLPotN pic.twitter.com/b7itIP3zoo– JFresh (@JFreshHockey) October 8, 2025
In short, we’re not quite there yet, but does anyone still have a great deal of confidence that Dach will have a brilliant career in Montreal?
For the moment, Kapanen, a Timmins-Bergevin pick, is surpassing expectations, and his subtle qualities – speed, shooting, intelligence and vision – were undoubtedly underestimated. du If Dach doesn’t get back on track, could he correct this dent in HuGo’s rebuilding plan? Let’s suspend judgment for now…
3. Filip Mesar’s selection 26th in 2022The more time passes, the more it seems that our initial hypothesis holds true, i.e. that the Habs drafted Mesar largely to please their friend Slafkovsky, at the expense of Jiri Kulich.
Of course, at 26th, the chances of being wrong are greater than in the top-15.
Of course, the Habs seem to have bounced back nicely with the unthinkable selection of Lane Hutson at 62nd and, to a lesser extent, Beck at 33rd, Rohrer at 75th and Engstrom at 92nd.
That makes up for it…
But Kulich (28th ), the man with the shot of fire, already CLEARLY better at the time, was on the same “hunting ground” as Mesar in Europe.
What a shot by Jiri Kulich pic.twitter.com/NPc3wSh2Hy
– The Sabre Report (@TheSabreReport) March 28, 2025
And we think he has superior talent to Kapanen and Dach..
Conclusion
Ultimately, replacing Lehkonen with Barron, now Carrier, an effective third-pair right-handed defenseman of roughly the same age as Lehkonen, really isn’t such a big “mistake”. But you can’t say it represents long-term progress, which is the goal of any rebuild..
Then, in retrospect, and somewhat ironically, it was Kirby Dach’s multiple injuries that benefited the Habs’ rebuild. If Dach hadn’t been injured all season in 2023-2024, HuGo probably wouldn’t have had the chance to draft Ivan Demidov at No. 5!
Finally, the “final-final” verdict is still out on Mesar’s selection. But despite encouraging signs at the last camp, the indicators are still in the red for the Slovak. Which is definitely not the case for the left-handed Kulich, 6’1, 193 lbs, promoted to the center of the second line in Buffalo! Well, well, well!
But, all in all, in the overall picture, these “little mistakes” of 2022 are not dramatic and, paradoxically, some of them may even have been profitable for drafting early in 2023 and 2024…
That said, Kapanen or not, no one would say no to Nazar or Kulich today at the center of the second line!
” And isn’t Slaf a mistake?”
We’re hearing this one more and more often! In my opinion, Cooley may be becoming an NHL offensive star and Wright may be showing encouraging signs, but I still don’t buy the idea that Slafkovsky could have been a “mistake” at first. It would take a catastrophe to change my mind.
In addition to getting off to a good start in his career and still developing like most big players at his age, is his usefulness among Montreal’s multiple small forwards really up for discussion? Imagine the average size of the Habs’ two first trios in his absence! At 21, very few NHL players are as good as he is at making life easier for his partners and winning 1-on-1 battles in the back of the net. The proof:
Slafkovsky’s “power playmaker” game is really breaking through. No other 18-20 year old ranked at the 90+ percentile in our play through contact metric. His ability to generate offence low in the zone is excellent.
https://t.co/TBUOI0kOpq https://t.co/gpKHZRR908 pic.twitter.com/3WmIWnwYAt
– Louis Boulet (@Louis_Boulet_) October 7, 2025
Without him, the Caufield-Suzuki duo really isn’t as effective. Together, the guys form the 4th best 5-on-5 line in the NHL! All that’s left is for Slafkovsky to put a few more pucks in the net. The rest of his game is really solid and useful to the team. In my opinion, he’s still the best choice the Habs could have made at No. 1.Next!
And 2023? Now, let’s just hope that David Reinbacher’s selection at No . 5 in 2023 doesn’t become THE big mistake of the Habs’ rebuild. If it does, it could be harder to correct than, say,the acquisition of Dach and the selection of MesarThat’s the big taboo right now…
More must-reads:
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!