
Here’s a sentence from the comment section that deserves to escape the comment section: “Depth players just got more expensive.” It referred to the Boston Bruins signing Fraser Minten to a long-term contract.
That’s actually a pretty big hockey story. Not because one particular player signed a big contract. Contracts come and go. Somebody is always getting paid more than somebody else thinks he should. The bigger issue is what happens when the middle of an NHL roster starts becoming expensive.
Every contender talks about depth. It sounds wonderful. Toronto Maple Leafs general manager John Chayka spent a good part of the off-season bringing in strong depth forwards. Some fans complained about the cost. However, the organization saw it as a necessary step in improving the team.
You want a strong top line, another good scoring line, a reliable third line, a fourth line that can play, six defencemen you trust and a couple of goalies who won’t make everybody nervous. Then you look at the salary cap. That costs money.
And this is where NHL rosters have become increasingly difficult to construct. The best players are obviously expensive. That’s nothing new. What’s changing is the price of the players who aren’t supposed to be the stars.
A third-line centre isn’t necessarily being paid to score 80 points anymore. He’s being paid because he can win draws, kill penalties, play against good players, survive playoff hockey and give the coach somebody he trusts. Those things have value. And when enough teams want the same type of player, the price goes up.
This may actually be one reason the Montreal Canadiens’ contract strategy is so interesting. If the Canadiens have their important young players signed to reasonable long-term deals, they can spend more of their available money on the players who don’t show up at the top of the scoring list.
That’s the part fans sometimes miss. A Stanley Cup roster isn’t 12 stars. It’s a collection of different players with different jobs. Some score. Some defend. Some kill penalties. Some provide size. Some win faceoffs. Some can move up the lineup when injuries hit.
And some simply make a coach feel comfortable putting them on the ice with two minutes left in a playoff game. Those players aren’t cheap anymore.
The Toronto experience offers an interesting cautionary tale. When a large percentage of the cap is committed to elite forwards, every $1 million or $2 million spent elsewhere becomes more important. That’s when management starts hunting for bargains. Sometimes it finds them. Sometimes it doesn’t.
Montreal may have given itself a little more breathing room by keeping its young core from consuming quite so much of the cap. That doesn’t guarantee anything. But it does create options. And perhaps that’s the real value of a good contract. The player isn’t necessarily underpaid.
It’s that the team can afford to pay somebody else, too.
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!