x
Trade Deadline Primer: Utah Mammoth
Rob Gray-Imagn Images

With the Olympic break now over, the trade deadline is tomorrow. Where do each team stand, and what moves should they be targeting? We continue our look around the league, focusing on playoff-hunting teams, and we’re back with the Mammoth.

The Mammoth are currently in a wild-card spot in the Western Conference and would love nothing more than to give their fans some playoff home games in just their second season. Utah has been mentioned as a potential suitor for St. Louis Blues forward Robert Thomas, who, at just 26 years of age, would fit with the Mammoth’s contention timeline. There are a few teams that can match Utah’s stockpile of future assets and young players, making that link a real possibility.

Record

32-25-4, 4th in the Central

Deadline Status

Buyer

Deadline Cap Space

$25.72MM on deadline day, 2/3 retention slots used, 45/50 contracts used, per PuckPedia.

Upcoming Draft Picks

2026: UTA 1st, UTA 3rd, CAR 3rd, UTA 4th, UTA 5th, CHI 5th, UTA 7th
2027: UTA 1st, UTA 2nd, UTA 3rd, TOR 3rd, UTA 4th, EDM 4th, UTA 5th, TBL 5th, UTA 6th, UTA 7th

Trade Chips

The Mammoth have a key UFA this summer in forward Nick Schmaltz, a player expected to be among, if not the best, free-agent forwards available. The Mammoth are unlikely to move the 30-year-old, who is having a career year and should be a major part of their playoff push. Other pending UFAs include forwards Alexander Kerfoot, Kevin Stenlund, defenseman Ian Cole, and backup goaltender Vitek Vanecek. Aside from Schmaltz, none of these players are expected to fetch much value on the trade market, and considering Utah’s position, it doesn’t make sense to move them.

Looking down the list of other potential trade chips, Utah has a top-five prospect system in the NHL with an embarrassment of riches, including Tij Iginla, Caleb Desnoyers, Dmitri Simashev, Daniil But, and Maveric Lamoureux.

Iginla has name recognition thanks to his father Jarome Iginla’s illustrious career, but he is a very different player from his dad. Iginla works quickly and plays a speed-based game that excels in transition and on the rush. He is a decent playmaker, though not exceptional, but his shot can do a lot of damage. Iginla plays with a high motor and isn’t afraid to be first in on the forecheck. If Utah were to make him available, there would be teams interested in him because of his abilities and pedigree.

As promising as Iginla is, he isn’t the Mammoth’s top prospect; that distinction belongs to forward Desnoyers, who was the fourth overall pick in last year’s NHL Entry Draft. Desnoyers had an outstanding playoff last year in the QMJHL, showcasing his skills and size by scoring 30 points in just 19 playoff games. Desnoyers plays a well-rounded game overall, but his skill level wouldn’t be considered high-end. That said, he is quite responsible defensively and is one of the hardest workers on the ice.

On the back end is Simashev, a towering defenseman who dominates the defensive zone and rarely gets caught running around in his own zone. Big defensemen remain in demand regardless of skill level and effectiveness, which is quite evident if you look at recent NHL trades (Tyler Myers, for example). Simashev doesn’t light up the score sheet (one assist in 24 NHL games), and no one will mistake him for an offensive defenseman, but he is a capable puck carrier, has fairly good passing skills, and, of course, can hit. Simashev’s already broken into the NHL roster at 21 years of age and has top-four NHL potential; he would be an ideal partner for an offensive defenseman, which is something teams are always looking for.

Finally, let’s look at Daniil But, who has spent some time in the NHL with the Mammoth and is having a solid offensive showing in the AHL as well. At 6’6” and just 21 years old, you might expect some awkwardness or clumsiness in But’s game, but he is actually quite smooth and refined in his puck handling, shooting, and passing. Not to be overlooked is his shooting, which is excellent, as his large frame allows him to generate plenty of torque on his shots, no matter which foot he uses. Teams often pay a premium for size, but the combination of size and skill gives But significant trade value if Utah decides to move him.

Team Needs

A Top Nine Forward: This team’s primary need was a top-four defenseman; however, since the Mammoth recently acquired MacKenzie Weegar, Utah now has a solid defensive unit. Up front, they could benefit from a scoring forward to better balance their top nine, as their offense is only average, ranking 16th in the NHL in scoring. As mentioned earlier, Utah was in talks with the Blues for Thomas, but no deal was reached. It’s difficult to determine whether Utah needs to acquire a player with Thomas’ skill level, but a top-six forward would definitely be ideal to move players down the lineup into roles better suited to their abilities. The player they acquire could also be a third liner, but their main focus will likely be scoring, whether it’s depth scoring or improving overall.

A Backup Goaltender: Utah is among the top defensive teams in the NHL, ranking fifth in goals against this season. The team has relied heavily on starter Karel Vejmelka and has used backup netminder Vaněček sparingly. The reason for Vaněček’s limited play is quite clear, given his poor performance this season in just 14 games. The 30-year-old has a 3-9-2 record, a 2.94 GAA, and a .884 SV%. Vaněček’s -1.3 goals saved above expected (according to MoneyPuck) isn’t the worst figure, but his lack of appearances and record with the team indicate a goaltender who hasn’t exactly boosted confidence among his teammates. Utah also lacks a reliable third option if Vejmelka or Vaněček were to get injured.

Photo by Kim Klement Neitzel-Imagn Images

This article first appeared on Pro Hockey Rumors and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!