By every metric, the 1970s were the worst decade in NBA history. The on-court product was lackluster, leading to record-low attendance and TV viewership. The off-court stories were more about players abusing drugs, with an estimate that up to 75 percent used cocaine.
It was also a free-for-all era devoid of dynasties, with eight different franchises capturing the NBA title in 10 years.
Yet some analysts have selective memories when comparing eras, suggesting that today's players wouldn't be able to handle the physicality of yesteryears. LeBron James — the unofficial flagbearer of the modern NBA — is determined to set the record straight.
In an appearance on "The Pat McAfee Show," James explained why he was tired of analysts comparing eras, but not before he mocked the quality of basketball in the 1970s.
"The game is different and we should respect all eras in that era," James stressed. "We can't be saying, 'Okay, because Wilt was great in the '60s and '70s, he'll be great now.' We also can't say some of the guys now won't be great then. It is what it is. Respect that era and move on. But the whole [comparing of players], every single day, 'He's better, he's not better.'
"You trying to tell me Giannis wouldn't be able to play an NBA game in the '70s?" James asked mockingly. "Giannis Antetokounmpo would have 250 points in a game in the 70s. That's no disrespect....With Kyrie [Irving], they would have told him, 'You can't dribble anymore.' They would have changed the rule."
“You trying to tell me Giannis wouldn't be able to play an NBA game in the 70’s? Giannis would have 250 points in a game in the 70’s.”
— Legion Hoops (@LegionHoops) March 26, 2025
— LeBron James
(via @PatMcAfeeShow, h/t @ohnohedidnt24)pic.twitter.com/isFjolkeJz
Some felt James was a bit hypocritical in his comments. He was right to highlight that it's unfair to compare players from different eras due to rule changes, the evolution of skills and style of play.
But it's also hyperbole to imply the '70s would have been child's play for "The Greek Freak." Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, the man who held the NBA's all-time scoring title for 39 years, never scored 250 points in a game (he maxed out at 55). And the Bucks legend owned the greatest go-to move in the sport's history, unlike Antetokounmpo, who still relies on bully ball and isn't always a reliable bucket-getter in the clutch.
Furthermore, Antetokounmpo would have had to contend with elite defensive bigs like Bill Walton, Abdul-Jabbar, Nate Thurmond and Bobby Jones. Finishing at the rim wouldn't have been a walk in the park, like it is against Alex Sarr and Jusuf Nurkic. Just saying.
The common consensus is that today's hoopers are more skilled, with nearly every player capable of dribbling, passing and shooting. However, certain old heads maintain that their successors have it easy. Allen Iverson, for example, believes he'd average 43 points in the modern NBA, and Shaquille O'Neal is convinced he'd be even more unstoppable now than in the late 1990s.
It's a never-ending, futile debate. Everyone, including James himself, should heed James' words and "respect that era and move on."
More must-reads:
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!