
ESPN analyst Dan Orlovsky has sparked debate with his latest take on Indiana Hoosiers quarterback Fernando Mendoza and Alabama Crimson Tide QB Ty Simpson.
On "Get Up" on Monday, former Detroit Lions QB Orlovsky said Simpson (6-foot-1, 211 pounds) is his pick for QB1 in the 2026 NFL Draft rather than Mendoza (6-foot-5, 236 pounds). On Tuesday, he doubled down on this take, telling Pat McAfee just two general managers have disagreed with him (h/t The 33rd Team's Ari Meirov). He added he has texted 12-15.
Orlovsky's opinion differs from the consensus. NFL Mock Draft Database ranks the Indiana QB as its No. 1 overall prospect and the Alabama QB prospect No. 35 on its big board. But it's worth crunching the numbers to determine whether Orlovsky's take is valid.
Traditional stats give the edge to Mendoza. The Indiana star ranked first in the FBS in passing touchdowns (41 in 16 games), fourth in yards per attempt (9.3) and first in passer rating (182.9) this past season. Simpson, meanwhile, tied for 12th in the country in TD passes (28 in 15 games), ranked 53rd in yards per attempt (7.5) and was 41st in passer rating (145.2). He also took more sacks (28) than Mendoza (25).
Dan Orlovsky says he texted 12–15 GMs/decision-makers that Alabama QB Ty Simpson is the best QB in the draft, and only 2 disagreed.
— Ari Meirov (@MySportsUpdate) March 24, 2026
( @PatMcAfeeShow) pic.twitter.com/qCv4QLjLRP
The Alabama star only bests the Indiana standout in interceptions thrown. Mendoza tossed six, while Simpson threw five.
So, the debate is settled, right? No. Let's consider advanced stats, which show a QB's ability to play under pressure, something the ESPN analyst said Simpson is better at.
"When it comes to moments of panic and big throws, real NFL throws, I think it's clearly Ty Simpson," Orlovsky said. "...I would much rather have Ty."
Simpson, however, struggled under pressure throughout the season. Per Sports Info Solutions, his passer rating dropped from 118 to 65.7 under pressure in 2025. Mendoza's passer rating, meanwhile, dipped from 140.2 to 98.3. That's still not as drastic as Simpson's.
Simpson did make more big-time throws than Mendoza. (Big-time throws are a metric Pro Football Focus uses to measure passes with high difficulty and high value.) Per the site, Simpson tied for 1st in BTTs (30) among 168 FBS QBs, while Mendoza tied for 19th (23).
But for those who are now worried about Mendoza's ability to deliver in key moments, watch Indiana's 27-21 win over the Miami Hurricanes in the College Football Playoff National Championship Game. That should tell you all you need to know about how Mendoza performs on the big stage.
Simpson is capable of producing crucial throws, but he lacks the elite accuracy at all levels of the field to do it consistently. Take a look at their completion percentages below to see how the prospects compare (via PFF). Air yards measure the distance the ball travels through the air.
| Passing depth | Mendoza | Simpson |
| Short (0-9 air yards) | 140-of-159 (88.1 percent) | 133-of-180 (73.9 percent) |
| Medium (10-19 air yards) | 55-of-86 (64 percent) | 63-of-108 (58.3 percent) |
| Deep (20-plus air yards) | 29-of-55 (52.7 percent) | 26-of-62 (41.9 percent) |
Much of a QB's success in the NFL depends on landing spot. But that doesn't change that Mendoza looks like the more pro-ready prospect.
The Las Vegas Raiders (who own pick No. 1 in the draft) should disregard Orlovsky's take and other analysts who strongly agree with it. The numbers say Mendoza is clearly QB1 in the class, so the AFC West team shouldn't be second-guessing itself in the weeks leading up to the draft (scheduled April 23-25 in Pittsburgh).
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!