There are many glorious science-based terms when it comes to surfing. We all talk about swells, of course, the underwater energy that creates a breaking wave. But we'll look at swell angles and bathymetry and energy, a new term making the rounds at the moment, and all these phrases eventually gel together to form our understanding of what's going on in the ocean.
There are also dozens of different types of waves to get to grips with as well—reefbreaks, A-frames, points, beachies, slabs, big waves and the list goes on and on and on. This is just the tip of the surf science iceberg. There's so much that goes into it that you can dedicate your life to figuring out the many nuances that the ocean can (and will) throw at you.
And then there's the fact that when you look at your local surf forecast, not all information is present to give you the best idea of what's going to happen at your beach. There are some forecasting models these days that bake external factors into them, away from just wind, swell and tide—maybe a slight whiff of bathymetry. But for the most part, some data may be missing. And it's important factors in the ocean that will really impact how waves break. This leads us neatly into wave refraction.
It's probably a term you've heard over the course of your surfing life. Either that or wave reflection—which is something completely different. Lots of people use both terms interchangeably, but, well, they're wrong. Sorry.
When talking about ocean waves, wave refraction is when a wave bends or changes direction as it propagates (i.e., travels at a specific speed) over changing depths. This also happens when there's a shift in wavelength and speed. However, in the water, this usually means when the wave hits a different depth.
Imagine a wave that has traveled for thousands upon thousands of miles. Waves approach the shore from incredibly deep water and then arrive onto a much shallower ocean floor. When the waves reach this shallower basin, they slow down, and the part of the wave still in deep water will continue at the same speed. Basically, this means that waves hitting shallower water slow the wave down, while parts of the wave continue on in deeper water.
This is refraction, and the way a wave breaks can also be impacted by what's going on under the surface on the ocean floor. So every surf spot in the world has its own unique footprint.
Because of this, you are more likely to have refraction in ground swells than wind swells. This is because wind swell is formed by the wind blowing over the surface of the ocean, and doesn't have an impact on the ocean floor. Also, wind swells tend to have a much lower period than ground swells. Surfing, there's always more to it than you think.
Concave and convex are the different terms of refraction and describe two different ways waves can refract. Let's take concave as a start; imagine a wave heading towards some shallow reef, surrounded by deep water. It slows down as it hits the shallow water, and the water on either side of the wave continues to run at the same speed, effectively creating a bend in the wave. This focuses the energy toward the middle of the wave and results in steeper and more powerful waves to surf. Think of Teahupo'o or Pipeline; these are good examples of this science at play.
The other side of the refraction coin is convex refraction. Imagine a headland jutting out into the ocean, as the swell fires in, it hits this point and breaks—but could continue running into deep water to the side of the point. The energy focuses towards the shallower water at the headland—and what we know about shallow water is that it slows waves down. This happens while the side of the wave continues at the same speed across deeper water. This is also known as "defocusing the energy" and makes up the bulk of the mechanics of point breaks. They usually have less "power" than concave refraction but can run for a long, long way, given that the wave farthest from the point will continue to travel over deeper water. J-Bay, anyone? Skeleton Bay? There's actually a whole lot of other bits going on at Skeleton Bay than just this, but that's another story.
And while this accommodates some of the theory around pointbreaks and reefbreaks, you may be wondering—"So, what the heck is happening at beach breaks?" Well, the humble beaches have a combination of so many factors going on—but the clue here is in the name; beach breaks work over sand. And it's how these waves interact with the sand bottom that can produce hollow, heavy gold or straight-up closeouts.
It's why, when looking at your local forecast, you don't want to be at a beach break when the swell period is into the high teens. This means a solid ground swell is approaching and requires a good, solid bit of reef or point to chop the swell up. If it hits a sand bar, they might not be able to do as good a job of cutting through the swell as rock, and the wave breaks all at once—meaning you're looking at a giant closeout.
Where refraction is the changing of waves as they pass from deep to shallow water, reflection is when the wave changes direction as the result of hitting a barrier, or when they bounce off something to create a different beast altogether. Imagine a wave bouncing off a seawall or harbor. This is when reflection is in play. The angle the wave hits any hard surface, the angle of approach and the angle it bounces away from the object all play a part in wave reflection—and can create some warped-looking mutants. Imagine some wedge-type waves; a lot of these are down to reflection being at its absolute chaotic best. The Wedge and Portugal's Molhe Leste are good examples of reflection at play.
More must-reads:
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!
With the NFL season about to kick off, there's no better time to look ahead and predict how the division standings will shake out by season's end. This week, Yardbarker's NFL crew came together to do just that.
There had to be at least some expectation that the Boise State Broncos were going to take a small step backwards in 2025. They probably just did not expect it to happen so soon in the season, and so emphatically. The No. 25 ranked Broncos were absolutely humiliated on Thursday night, losing 34-7 to an unranked South Florida team that was just 7-6 a year ago. It was a rude awakening for what might be ahead for Boise State following the departure of Heisman Trophy runner-up Ashton Jeanty. Jeanty's historic season helped carry the Broncos to an 12-1 regular season, with the only regular season loss being a three-point defeat to Oregon early in the season. They ended up in the College Football Playoff where they lost their first game to Penn State. But with Jeanty on to the NFL (a first-round pick by the Las Vegas Raiders) there was always going to be a huge hole for them to replace. Not only in terms of production and skill, but also in their identity. They had none of that power-running identity on Thursday. Not only did they allow 34 consecutive points to South Florida, but the Broncos also managed to rush for only 122 yards on 38 carries, coming out to just 3.2 yards per attempt. They averaged 6.1 yards per carry in 2024, tied for the second-highest mark in college football. On one hand, losing an early season game isn't the end of the world, especially in the era of expanded playoffs. Boise State could still run the table the rest of the way with a very manageable schedule and play its way back into playoff contention. It's also not uncommon for teams to struggle early in the season. There is no preseason in college football and everybody is just coming in cold right into real games. Sometimes teams take a while to get moving. But this is not a particularly good South Florida team, and for Boise State to come out so flat and be so uncompetitive in the opener is a bad sign for what might be ahead.
If you're an avid golfer, you know the anxiety-inducing feeling of showing up to your local muni as a twosome on a busy Sunday afternoon. The twosome you get paired with can make or break your entire weekend. Since captain Keegan Bradley finalized the U.S. Ryder Cup roster on Wednesday, let's have some fun by ranking the three worst duos you would hate to be paired with on the golf course. 3. Cameron Young and Harris English Getting paired with Young and English would be a bore fest from the first tee to the 18th green. The introductory handshakes and the occasional "nice shot" would be the only interactions you get from them all day. You'll spend the entire round debating whether they're 25 or 45. At some point, you'll ask your buddy if they're even friends. Sure, it would be a treat to watch Young bomb majestic high draws 350 yards and English drain multiple 30-footers with ease, but that's where the fun would stop. The over/under for the number of smiles cracked between the two of them might be set at 2.5. 2. Collin Morikawa and Sam Burns Morikawa just doesn't seem like a good hang this year. From multiple quarrels with the media to a handful of caddie switches in the span of a few months, Morikawa has been too high-strung and paranoid in 2025. He'd be quick to blame you for a poor drive because you blinked too aggressively in his backswing. No thank you. Burns is on the other end of the spectrum in that he'll keep to himself and pretend not to know Morikawa very well. He'll throw out a "Sorry about him, he's having a tough year" to ease the tension, but his personality isn't bubbly enough to offset Morikawa's bad vibes. 1. Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele Cantlay would be the absolute worst-case scenario as a random pairing. You'd think his minute-long pitter-patter over the ball on the first tee was a one-time exercise to ease his nerves, but you quickly realize it's a steady feature of his pre-shot routine. Even though he's hitting the fewest shots, he's taking the longest time to hit them. The groups behind you start to pile up. At one point, the impatient union worker behind you hits into your group to send a message. Cantlay doesn't care. Five hours later, you finally finish up on 18. The group that was in front of you all day is already on their second beverage at the clubhouse bar. In an age when pace of play is just as important as your final score, Cantlay would be a nightmare pairing.
While Kyle Schwarber stole the show on Thursday with his four home runs, Aaron Nola made some franchise history of his own. The longtime Philadelphia Phillies right-hander surpassed 2008 NLCS and World Series MVP Cole Hamels (1,844) for third on the team’s all-time strikeout list with 1,845 punchouts. Nola’s historic strikeout came against Ronald Acuna Jr. in the sixth inning on a 79 mph curveball. Overall, he struck out four across six innings, allowing four runs on four hits and three walks. It wasn't the cleanest final line, but the Phillies’ offense supplied plenty of run support in a 19-4 win over the Atlanta Braves. Philadelphia's longest-tenured player recently returned from a rare three-month stint on the injured list. He has a 6.47 ERA in 12 starts this season, with 66 Ks in 64 innings. So, being able to accomplish this career milestone must feel good. Nola achieved the feat across 280 career starts — all with Philadelphia, who drafted him in the first round of the 2014 MLB Draft out of LSU. The 32-year-old made his big league debut in 2015. The one-time All-Star has compiled a solid 11-year career thus far as one of the most durable pitchers in the league. He owns a 107-86 record alongside a 3.81 ERA, six complete games and four shutouts. Nola is now just 26 strikeouts away from overtaking Robin Roberts (1,871) for second place on the Phillies’ all-time list. Steve Carlton has the most Ks in franchise history by a wide margin with 3,031.