Look, we get it. Watching Novak Djokovic struggle through another tournament without lifting a trophy has become as predictable as your friend who insists they’re “almost ready to leave” but takes another hour. But before we start planning the Serbian legend’s retirement party, Taylor Fritz has something to say about it—and honestly, he might have a point.
Let’s be brutally honest here. The man who dominated tennis for over a decade has been looking more mortal lately than we’d like to admit. Djokovic hasn’t won a Grand Slam, ATP 1000, or even an ATP 500 tournament in two whole years. Two years! That’s longer than most Hollywood marriages last these days.
The Shanghai Masters debacle really drove the nail home. Here’s a guy who became the oldest player to reach a Masters 1000 final, which sounds impressive until you realize he got absolutely demolished by Valentin Vacherot—a qualifier ranked 204th in the world at the time. Ouch. That’s like watching Michael Jordan lose a pickup game to your neighborhood’s weekend warrior.
The tennis world collectively winced watching that straight-sets beatdown (6-3, 6-4). It wasn’t just a loss; it was the kind of defeat that makes you wonder if Father Time has finally caught up with the 24-time Grand Slam champion.
But Fritz, fresh off his own solid season with two titles under his belt, isn’t ready to write Djokovic’s tennis obituary just yet. Speaking at the Six Kings Slam in Saudi Arabia (yes, that controversial money-grab tournament that everyone criticizes but secretly wishes they were invited to), the American had some surprisingly supportive words.
“He hasn’t really shown too many signs of slowing down,” Fritz told reporters, apparently watching different matches than the rest of us. “He obviously has had a great year, semis at every Grand Slam. It’s tough to even think about him retiring or being done soon when he is producing the level he is producing.”
Wait, hold up. Fritz actually has a point here, and it’s one that’s easy to miss when you’re busy focusing on what Djokovic isn’t winning. Making the semifinals of every Grand Slam this year isn’t exactly chopped liver. Most players would kill for that consistency, even if it does feel like settling for participation trophies when you’re used to collecting the real thing.
Here’s where things get interesting, and where Fritz’s perspective becomes genuinely valuable. We’ve become so accustomed to Djokovic’s dominance that anything short of absolute supremacy feels like failure. But let’s pump the brakes for a second and consider what “slowing down” actually looks like for a 38-year-old athlete.
The man is still reaching Grand Slam semifinals consistently. He’s still making Masters finals. Sure, he’s not converting those opportunities into titles like he used to, but he’s still getting there. That’s not exactly the trajectory of someone whose body is “giving up on him,” as some have suggested.
Fritz also defended the Six Kings Slam, comparing it to the Laver Cup and highlighting something important about modern tennis that fans often overlook. “I think this is a great event. Like the Laver Cup, when you have the best players in the world playing against each other, it’s great,” he explained.
The tournament offers a staggering $4.5 million to the winner, which is more than some players make in an entire year. Critics love to bash these Saudi-backed exhibitions, but here’s the thing—they’re giving us exactly what we claim we want: the best players facing off against each other in high-stakes matches.
Fritz acknowledges the scheduling nightmare these events create: “The unfortunate thing is the schedule is already extremely packed as it is. So you have to choose between these things that are very enjoyable to do and weigh it against how packed the tour already is.”
The truth is, retirement talk around Djokovic feels premature, even if his recent performances have been underwhelming. The Serbian superstar has shown throughout his career that he thrives on proving doubters wrong. Remember when everyone thought he was finished after his 2017 struggles? He came back stronger than ever.
Fritz’s assessment might seem overly optimistic, but it’s grounded in what’s actually happening on court rather than what we expect to happen. Djokovic is still competing at the highest level, still reaching the business end of major tournaments, and still capable of producing moments of brilliance.
The question isn’t whether Djokovic can still play tennis at an elite level—he clearly can. The question is whether he can rediscover that killer instinct that separated him from everyone else for so long.
Fritz’s plea for Djokovic to continue playing isn’t just sentiment; it’s recognition that tennis is better with legends like Novak still competing. Even a diminished Djokovic brings something special to every tournament he enters.
Sure, he might not be the unstoppable force he once was, but writing off a player of his caliber based on a two-year title drought seems hasty. Especially when that “drought” includes four Grand Slam semifinals and a Masters final.
Maybe Fritz is onto something. Maybe we should appreciate what we’re witnessing—a legend refusing to go quietly into the night—rather than constantly measuring it against past glories. After all, how many 38-year-olds are making Grand Slam semifinals anyway?
More must-reads:
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!